David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 51 (2):213-239 (1987)
In the debate about the nature and identity of possible worlds, philosophers have neglected the parallel questions about the nature and identity of moments of time. These are not questions about the structure of time in general, but rather about the internal structure of each individual time. Times and worlds share the following structural similarities: both are maximal with respect to propositions (at every world and time, either p or p is true, for every p); both are consistent; both are closed (every modal consequence of a proposition true at a world is also true at that world, and every tense-theoretic consequence of a proposition true at a time is also true at that time); just as there is a unique actual world, there is a unique present moment; and just as a proposition is necessarily true iff true at all worlds, a proposition is eternally true iff true at all times. In this paper, I show that a simple extension of my theory of worlds yields a theory of times in which the above structural similarities between the two are consequences.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David K. Lewis (1973). Counterfactuals. Blackwell Publishers.
Jon Barwise & John Perry (1981). Situations and Attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):668-691.
David Lewis (1979). Attitudes de Dicto and de Se. Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
Jon Barwise (1989). The Situation in Logic. Center for the Study of Language and Inf.
Citations of this work BETA
Thomas M. Crisp (2007). Presentism and the Grounding Objection. Noûs 41 (1):90–109.
Daniel Nolan (2015). The A Posteriori Armchair. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):211-231.
Meghan Sullivan (2012). Problems for Temporary Existence in Tense Logic. Philosophy Compass 7 (1):43-57.
Edward N. Zalta (1993). Twenty-Five Basic Theorems in Situation and World Theory. Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (4):385-428.
Leo Carton Mollica (2015). Explanation and Nowness: An Objection to the A-Theory. Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2513-2530.
Similar books and articles
Heather Dyke (1998). Real Times and Possible Worlds. In Robin le Poidevin (ed.), Questions of time and tense. Oxford University Press 93--117.
Scott Soames (2011). True At. [REVIEW] Analysis 71 (1):124 - 133.
Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe (2000). Time and Propositions in Jerónimo Pardo. In I. Angelelli & P. Pérez-Ilzarbe (eds.), Medieval and Renaissance Logic in Spain. Olms 54--251.
Stephen Barker (2011). Can Counterfactuals Really Be About Possible Worlds? Noûs 45 (3):557-576.
Ulrich Meyer (2006). Worlds and Times. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (1):25--37.
Greg Restall (1997). Ways Things Can't Be. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):583-596.
Jeffrey C. King (2007). What in the World Are the Ways Things Might Have Been? [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 133 (3):443 - 453.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #70,275 of 1,934,509 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #195,826 of 1,934,509 )
How can I increase my downloads?