Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):231-242 (1993)
|Abstract||In an author-meets-critics session at the March 1992 Pacific APA meetings, the critics (Christopher Menzel, Harry Deutsch, and C. Anthony Anderson) commented on the author's book *Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality* (Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford, 1988). The critical commentaries are published in this issue together with these replies by the author. The author responds to questions concerning the system he proposes, and in particular, to questions concerning the treatment of modality, the semantics of belief reports, and the general efficacy of the metaphysical foundations as compared to that of set theory.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Colin Radford (1989). Replies to Three Critics. Philosophy 64 (247):93 - 97.
C. H. Whiteley (1974). Confirmationism: Replies to Critics. Mind 83 (329):116-117.
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2011). Agents and Acacias: Replies to Dennett, Sterelny, and Queller. Biology and Philosophy 26 (4):501-515.
Edward N. Zalta (1988). A Comparison of Two Intensional Logics. Linguistics and Philosophy 11 (1):59-89.
John Fischer (2012). Replies to Critics. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 158 (3):529-540.
Catherine Z. Elgin (1993). Outstanding Problems: Replies to Zif Critics. Synthese 95 (1):129 - 140.
Samir Okasha (2010). Replies to My Critics. Biology and Philosophy 25 (3):425-431.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,331 of 722,701 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,701 )
How can I increase my downloads?