David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):231-242 (1993)
In an author-meets-critics session at the March 1992 Pacific APA meetings, the critics (Christopher Menzel, Harry Deutsch, and C. Anthony Anderson) commented on the author's book *Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality* (Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford, 1988). The critical commentaries are published in this issue together with these replies by the author. The author responds to questions concerning the system he proposes, and in particular, to questions concerning the treatment of modality, the semantics of belief reports, and the general efficacy of the metaphysical foundations as compared to that of set theory.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Colin Radford (1989). Replies to Three Critics. Philosophy 64 (247):93 - 97.
Samir Okasha (2010). Replies to My Critics. Biology and Philosophy 25 (3):425-431.
Catherine Z. Elgin (1993). Outstanding Problems: Replies to Zif Critics. Synthese 95 (1):129 - 140.
John Fischer (2012). Replies to Critics. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 158 (3):529-540.
Edward N. Zalta (1988). A Comparison of Two Intensional Logics. Linguistics and Philosophy 11 (1):59-89.
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2011). Agents and Acacias: Replies to Dennett, Sterelny, and Queller. Biology and Philosophy 26 (4):501-515.
C. H. Whiteley (1974). Confirmationism: Replies to Critics. Mind 83 (329):116-117.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #112,737 of 1,098,967 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #114,620 of 1,098,967 )
How can I increase my downloads?