David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):29–52 (2001)
The paper deals with our ability to classify objects as being of a certain kind on the basis of information provided by the senses (empirical classification) and to ascribe empirical predicates to objects on the basis of these classificatory verdicts (empirical predication). I consider, first, the project of construing the episodes in which this ability is exercised as involving universals. I argue that this construal faces epistemological problems concerning our access to the universals that it invokes. I present the empiricist strategy for dealing with these problems by appeal to sensory qualities, and argue that it rests on a mistake. Then I turn to sketching an account of our faculty of empirical classification and predication which doesn't invoke universals. The account takes as its starting point the nominalist construal of sense experience to be found in the work of C. I. Lewis and Nelson Goodman. I argue that this construal has the resources for explaining some of the central features of the practice of empirical predication. There are those who feel that our ability to understand general terms ... would be inexplicable unless there were universals as objects of apprehension. And there are those who fail to detect, in such appeal to a realm of entities over and above the concrete objects in space and time, any explanatory value. W. V. O. Quine, ‘Logic and the Reification of Universals’
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
José L. Zalabardo (2009). One Strand in the Rule-Following Considerations. Synthese 171 (3):509 - 519.
Similar books and articles
S. Peri (1977). The Problem of Universals and its Perceptual Correlates. Synthese 35 (4):447 - 456.
Howard Peacock (2009). What's Wrong with Ostrich Nominalism? Philosophical Papers 38 (2):183-217.
Jiri Benovsky (2009). On (Not) Being in Two Places at the Same Time: An Argument Against Endurantism. American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):239 - 248.
Geoffrey Sampson (1978). Linguistic Universals as Evidence for Empiricism. Journal of Linguistics.
Charles Landesman (1971). The Problem of Universals. New York,Basic Books.
Torsten Wilholt (2006). Think About the Consequences! Nominalism and the Argument From the Philosophy of Logic. Dialectica 60 (2):115–133.
Herbert Hochberg (1965). On Being and Being Presented. Philosophy of Science 32 (2):123-136.
Byjosé L. Zalabardo (2003). Wittgenstein on Accord. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):311–329.
Susan V. Castagnetto (1992). Reid's Answer to Abstract Ideas. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:39-60.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #107,735 of 1,100,994 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #81,070 of 1,100,994 )
How can I increase my downloads?