David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Noûs 29 (2):189-211 (1995)
A. Plantinga develops a challenging critique of Castañeda's guise theory, by identifying fundamental intuitions that guise theory gives up and by developing several objections to the guise-theoretic world view as a whole. In this paper, I examine whether Plantinga's criticisms apply to the theory of abstract objects. The theory of abstract objects and guise theory can be fruitfully compared because they share a common intellectual heritage---both follow Ernst Mally  in postulating a special realm of objects distinguished by their "internal" or "encoded" properties. Despite this common heritage, however, the theories organize, develop, and apply these special objects in distinctive ways. The two metaphysical systems, therefore, differ significantly, and these differences become important when one considers Plantinga's critique of guise theory. In this essay, the author shows that the theory of abstract objects anticipates and addresses most of Plantinga's concerns about guise theory, by preserving intuitions guise theory has abandoned.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Diane Proudfoot (2006). Possible Worlds Semantics and Fiction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (1):9 - 40.
Diane Proudfoot (2006). Possible Worlds Semantics and Fiction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (1):9-40.
Similar books and articles
Bernard Linsky (2005). Remarks on Platonized Naturalism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):3-15.
Alberto Voltolini (1996). Guises and Their Existence. Axiomathes 7 (3):419-434.
R. Mark Sainsbury (2010). Paderewski Variations. Dialectica 64 (4):483-502.
Edward N. Zalta (2006). Deriving and Validating Kripkean Claims Using the Theory of Abstract Objects. Noûs 40 (4):591–622.
William J. Rapaport & Francesco Orilia (eds.) (1998). Thought, Language, and Ontology, Essays in Memory of Hector-Neri Castaneda. Kluwer.
Edward N. Zalta (2002). A Common Ground and Some Surprising Connections. Southern Journal of Philosophy (Supplement) 40 (S1):1-25.
David J. Anderson & Edward N. Zalta (2004). Frege, Boolos, and Logical Objects. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (1):1-26.
Edward N. Zalta (2000). Neo-Logicism? An Ontological Reduction of Mathematics to Metaphysics. Erkenntnis 53 (1-2):219-265.
A. Sierszulska (2006). On Tichy's Determiners and Zalta's Abstract Objects. Axiomathes 16 (4):486-498.
Alberto Voltolini (1995). Are (Possible) Guises Internally Characterizable? Acta Analytica 13:65-90.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #107,455 of 1,790,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #83,046 of 1,790,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?