David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (3):315-332 (1999)
D0 works 0f an essentially involve a relation t0 an audience'? Many otherwise very different theories of art agree than they do. S0 the question ‘Wha1 is art?" has no be answered by describing than relation. I shall argue 10 the ccmmrary [hm a theory of wha; ir is m be art should nm invoke any relacicm m an audience. Art has nothing esscmial to do with an audience.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
James Shelley (2010). Against Value Empiricism in Aesthetics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):707-720.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Wolterstorff (1980). Works and Worlds of Art. Oxford University Press.
Joshua Fineberg (2006). Classical Music Why Bother?: Hearing the World of Contemporary Culture Through a Composer's Ears. Routledge.
Nick Zangwill (2002). Are There Counterexamples to Aesthetic Theories of Art? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):111–118.
Raymond Durgnat (1970). Art and Audience. British Journal of Aesthetics 10 (1):11-24.
James O. Young (2010). Art and the Educated Audience. Journal of Aesthetic Education 44 (3):29-42.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #63,581 of 1,103,045 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,820 of 1,103,045 )
How can I increase my downloads?