British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):29-43 (2004)
|Abstract||I argue that Hanslick was right to think that music should not be understood in terms of emotion. In particular, it is not essential to music to possess emotions, arouse emotions, express emotions, or represent emotions. All such theories are misguided.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Leonard B. Meyer (1956). Emotion and Meaning in Music. [Chicago]University of Chicago Press.
Malcolm Budd (1980). The Repudiation of Emotion: Hanslick on Music. British Journal of Aesthetics 20 (1):29-43.
Malcolm Budd (1985). Music and the Emotions: The Philosophical Theories. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Joel J. Kupperman (1995). An Anti-Essentialist View of the Emotions. Philosophical Psychology 8 (4):341-351.
Hanne Appelqvist (2011). Form and Freedom: The Kantian Ethos of Musical Formalism. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 40 (40-41):75-88.
Nick Zangwill (2009). Appropriate Musical Metaphors. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 20 (38).
Geoffrey Madell (2002). Philosophy, Music and Emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
Robert J. Yanal (2006). Hanslick's Third Thesis. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (3):259-266.
Nick Zangwill (2007). Music, Emotion and Metaphor. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (4):391-400.
Nick Zangwill (2007). Music, Metaphor, and Emotion. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (4):391–400.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #31,657 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,343 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?