Against the sociology of art

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):206-218 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aesthetic theories of art refuse to go away. In spite of decades of criticism and derision, a minority of thinkers stubbornly persist in maintaining that we need a general theory of art that makes essential appeal to beauty, elegance, daintiness, and other aesthetic properties.1 However, those who approach the theory of art from a sociological point of view tend to be skeptical about any account of art that appeals to aesthetic properties in a fundamental way. This skepticism takes two overlapping forms, only one of which I will pursue here. The form of skepticism I am interested in is concerned to deny that we need to appeal to aesthetic considerations in explaining the production of art. Let us call this production skepticism. This form of skepticism does not coincide with skepticism about the appeal to aesthetic considerations in explaining our experiences and judgments about art. Let us call that consumption skepticism. Examples of consumption skeptics are Pierre Bourdieu and Terry Eagleton, who think that aesthetic value judgments about art really reflect social status rather than being a response to qualities of the works.2 In my view, the reasons, such as they are, that Bourdieu and Eagleton put forward in favor of..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The aesthetic function of art.Gary Iseminger - 2004 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Edited by Kevin A. Stoehr.
Are there counterexamples to aesthetic theories of art?Nick Zangwill - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):111–118.
Kant, Adorno and the work of art.Murray W. Skees - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8):915-933.
Ideas about art.Kathleen Kadon Desmond - 2011 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Art, Self and Knowledge.Keith Lehrer - 2011 - , US: Oxford University Press.
Non-perceptual aesthetic properties: Comments for James Shelley.Noël Carroll - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):413-423.
Aesthetics.Harold Osborne - 1972 - London,: Oxford University Press.
A note on Nick Zangwill's `against the sociology of art'.Bridget Fowler - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (3):363-374.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
60 (#239,984)

6 months
3 (#439,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nick Zangwill
University College London

Citations of this work

A note on Nick Zangwill's `against the sociology of art'.Bridget Fowler - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (3):363-374.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Groundrules in the Philosophy of Art.Nick Zangwill - 1995 - Philosophy 70 (274):533 - 544.

Add more references