Diagnostic frameworks and nursing diagnoses: a normative stance

Nursing Philosophy 16 (1):64-73 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Diagnostic frameworks are essential to many scientific and technological activities and clinical practice. This study examines the main fundamental aspects of such frameworks. The three components required for all diagnoses are identified and examined, i.e. their normative dimension, temporal nature and structure, and teleological perspective.The normative dimension of a diagnosis is based on (1) epistemic values when associated with Hempel's inductive risk concerning the balance between false‐positive and false‐negative outcomes, leading to probabilistic judgements; and (2) non‐epistemic values when related to ideas such as well‐being, normality, illness, etc, as idealized norms or ideal points of reference.It should be noted that medical diagnoses match the three necessary components, while some essential diagnostic frameworks – the taxonomies of Gordon and NANDA – in nursing lack some components. The main lack is normative as the most popular frameworks in nursing diagnosis seem to be descriptions of observed reality rather than normative and value‐based judgements in which both epistemic and non‐epistemic values may coexist.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to Be a Normative Expressivist.Michael Pendlebury - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):182-207.
Getting the Personal Perspective into View.Gloria Ayob - 2013 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 20 (2):127-130.
Conceptual issues in nursing ethics research.Joy Hinson Penticuff - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (3):235-258.
Limitation of the diagnostic effort in paediatrics.C. M. Gonzalez - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (11):648-651.
Psychiatric diagnoses: A continuing controversy.James L. Mathis - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (2):253-261.
Normativism versus mechanism.Valerie A. Thompson - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):272-273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-22

Downloads
21 (#692,524)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniele Chiffi
Politecnico di Milano

Citations of this work

Varieties of Probability in Clinical Diagnosis.Pierdaniele Giaretta & Daniele Chiffi - 2018 - Acta Baltica Historiae Et Philosophiae Scientiarum 6 (1):5-27.

Add more citations