Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (3) (1996)
|Abstract||This article reviews the historical and current controversies about the nature of clinical ethics consultation, as a way to focus on the place and responsibility of ethics consultants within the context of clinical conversation — interpreted as a form of dialogue. These matters are approached through a particularly compelling instance of the controversy that involves several major figures in the field. The analysis serves to highlight very significant questions of the nature and constraints of clinical situations, and the moral responsibility and legal accountability that are especially important for clinical ethics consultants.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael D. Coughlin & John Watts (1993). A Descriptive Study of Healthcare Ethics Consultants in Canada: Results of a National Survey. HEC Forum 5 (3).
Alfred Simon (2009). Quality Standards for Clinical Ethics Consultation. Diametros 22:105 – 115.
Sally Clayton & Bruce Bongar (1994). The Use of Consultation in Psychological Practice: Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Considerations. Ethics and Behavior 4 (1):43 – 57.
Peter Singer, Edmund Pellegrino & Mark Siegler (2001). Clinical Ethics Revisited. BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-8.
George J. Agich (2005). What Kind of Doing is Clinical Ethics? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):7-24.
George J. Agich (2009). The Issue of Expertise in Clinical Ethics. Diametros 22:3-20.
Florian Bruns & Andreas Frewer (2011). Ethics Consultation and Empathy. HEC Forum 23 (4):247-255.
Richard M. Zaner (1993). Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):9-31.
Lisa M. Rasmussen (2011). An Ethics Expertise for Clinical Ethics Consultation. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):649-661.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #93,337 of 549,066 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,066 )
How can I increase my downloads?