Two dogmas of Kantian aesthetics
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
How do aesthetic judgements differ from ordinary empirical judgements? It is widely accepted that one important respect in which judgements of taste differ from empirical judgements is that they are based on some kind of felt reaction or response — typically a pleasure or displeasure. This doctrine gained its classic statement in Kant’s Critique of Judgement. And it is the basis for the prevalent view that in aesthetics, we must ’judge for ourselves’. The doctrine is generally taken to imply that a judgement which is not based on such a reaction is not a judgement of taste.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Immanuel Kant (2007/2005). Critique of Judgement. Oxford University Press.
Caj Strandberg (2011). A Structural Disanalogy Between Aesthetic and Ethical Value Judgements. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (1):51-67.
Andrew Chignell (2007). Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):415 – 433.
Malcolm Budd (2007). The Intersubjective Validity of Aesthetic Judgements. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4):333-371.
Elisabeth Schellekens (2006). Towards a Reasonable Objectivism for Aesthetic Judgements. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2):163-177.
Ted Cohen (2002). Three Problems in Kant's Aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):1-12.
Bart Vandenabeele (2008). The Subjective Universality of Aesthetic Judgements Revisited. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (4):410-425.
Malcolm Budd (2008). Aesthetic Essays. Oxford University Press.
Dabney Townsend (2003). Cohen on Kant's Aesthetic Judgements. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):75-79.
Miles Rind (2003). Kant's Beautiful Roses: A Response to Cohen's ‘Second Problem’. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):65-74.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #150,252 of 1,793,151 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,412 of 1,793,151 )
How can I increase my downloads?