David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):9-31 (1993)
Four prominent views of the nature and methods of clinical ethics (especially in consultation forums) are reviewed; each is then submitted to a criticism intended to show both weaknesses and strengths. It is argued that clinical ethics needs to be responsive to the specific complexities of clinical situations. For this, the need for an expanded notion of practical reason within unique situations is emphasized, one whose aim is to facilitate decision-making on the part of those directly responsible for them and consonant with their own respective moral frameworks and conceptions of what is most worthwhile. Keywords: Casuistry, clinical ethics, consultation, decision-making, dialogue, facilitator, practical reason, relationships CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
H. Tristram Engelhardt (2011). Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultants: In Search of Professional Status in a Post-Modern World. HEC Forum 23 (3):129-145.
Richard M. Zaner (1999). Afterword. Human Studies 22 (1):99-116.
Mark J. Bliton & Stuart G. Finder (1999). Strange, but Not Stranger: The Peculiar Visage of Philosophy in Clinical Ethics Consultation. [REVIEW] Human Studies 22 (1):69-97.
Similar books and articles
Henrik R. Wulff (1995). The Inherent Paternalism in Clinical Practice. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (3):299-311.
Lisa M. Rasmussen (2011). An Ethics Expertise for Clinical Ethics Consultation. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):649-661.
Florian Bruns & Andreas Frewer (2011). Ethics Consultation and Empathy. HEC Forum 23 (4):247-255.
Jacqueline J. Glover, David T. Ozar & David C. Thomasma (1986). Teaching Ethics on Rounds: The Ethicist as Teacher, Consultant, and Decision-Maker. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
George J. Agich (2009). The Issue of Expertise in Clinical Ethics. Diametros 22:3-20.
Peter Singer, Edmund Pellegrino & Mark Siegler (2001). Clinical Ethics Revisited. BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-8.
John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer (1991). The Clinical Ethicist at the Bedside. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Stuart G. Finder & Mark J. Bliton (2011). Responsibility After the Apparent End: 'Following-Up' in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Bioethics 25 (7):413-424.
George J. Agich (2005). What Kind of Doing is Clinical Ethics? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):7-24.
Richard M. Zaner (1996). Listening or Telling? Thoughts on Responsiblity in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (3).
Added to index2010-08-22
Total downloads14 ( #118,894 of 1,099,911 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #90,387 of 1,099,911 )
How can I increase my downloads?