Graduate studies at Western
Neuroethics 6 (1):141-153 (2013)
|Abstract||The moral enhancement of humans by biological or genetic means has recently been urged as a response to the pressing concerns facing human civilization. In this paper, I argue that proponents of biological moral enhancement have misrepresented the facts of human moral psychology. As a result, the likely effectiveness of traditional methods of moral enhancement has been underestimated, relative to biological or genetic means. I review arguments in favor of biological moral enhancement and argue that the complexity of moral psychology raises serious problems for such interventions. I offer a programmatic sketch of the ways in which our improved understanding of moral psychology can help facilitate more traditional methods of moral enhancement. I conclude that the best response to the dangers faced by human civilization is the continued use of traditional methods of moral enhancement and the use of our improved understanding of moral psychology to further refine and develop these methods.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rocco Pezzimenti (2011). The Open Society Along the Arduous Path of Modernity: With Letters From Isaiah Berlin and Hilary Putnam. Gracewing.
Ben Dixon (2005). Achieving Moral Progress Despite Moral Regress. Social Philosophy Today 21:157-172.
Leslie Sklair (1968). Gomte and the Idea of Progress. Inquiry 11 (1-4):321 – 331.
Geert Roskam (2005). On the Path to Virtue: The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and its Reception in (Middle-)Platonism. Leuven University Press.
Catherine Wilson (2011). Moral Progress Without Moral Realism. Philosophical Papers 39 (1):97-116.
W. Y. Evans-Wentz (1968). Tibetan Yoga and Secret Doctrines. New York [Etc.],Oxford U.P..
James Ware (2008). Moral Progress and Divine Power in Seneca and Paul. In John T. Fitzgerald (ed.), Passions and Moral Progress in Greco-Roman Thought. Routledge.
Richard A. Wright (2008). Plutarch on Moral Progress. In John T. Fitzgerald (ed.), Passions and Moral Progress in Greco-Roman Thought. Routledge.
L. Michael White (2008). Moral Pathology : Passions, Progress, and Protreptic in Clement of Alexandria. In John T. Fitzgerald (ed.), Passions and Moral Progress in Greco-Roman Thought. Routledge.
René Brouwer (2007). Roskam (G.) On the Path to Virtue. The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and its Reception in (Middle-)Platonism. (Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, Series 1, 33.) Pp. Viii + 507. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2005. Cased, ???60. ISBN: 978-90-5867-476-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 57 (01):73-.
John T. Fitzgerald (2008). The Passions and Moral Progress : An Introduction. In John T. Fitzgerald (ed.), Passions and Moral Progress in Greco-Roman Thought. Routledge.
G. R. Boys-Stones (2007). Philosophy (G.) Roskam On the Path to Virtue. The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and its Reception in (Middle-) Platonism. (Ancient and Medieval Philosophy: De Wulf-Mansion Centre Series 1, Vol. 33). Leuven: Leuven UP, 2005. Pp. Viii + 507. 60. 9058674762. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 127:250-.
Pauline Kleingeld (1999). Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development. History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (1):59-80.
Jeff Frank (2011). Love and Ruin(S): Robert Frost on Moral Repair. Educational Theory 61 (5):587-600.
Tobias Hoffmann (2006). Aquinas on the Moral Progress of the Weak Willed. In Tobias Hoffmann, Jörn Müller & Matthias Perkams (eds.), The Problem of Weakness of Will in Medieval Philosophy. Peeters.
Added to index2012-10-11
Total downloads5 ( #170,394 of 740,252 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,535 of 740,252 )
How can I increase my downloads?