David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):614-620 (2011)
This article examines the complex and contemporary issue of the return of research results in biobanks. After suggesting the exclusion of some adjacent issues usually flanking the debate, this article reviews the current practices of biobanks on the disclosure of research results to participants. It then focuses more specifically on the debate in the literature before turning to a review of the typology of recent reforms being put forward
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bartha Maria Knoppers & Amy Dam (2011). Return of Results: Towards a Lexicon? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):577-582.
Emmanuelle Lévesque, Yann Joly & Jacques Simard (2011). Return of Research Results: General Principles and International Perspectives. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):583-592.
Denise Avard, Karine Sénécal, Parvaz Madadi & Daniel Sinnett (2011). Pediatric Research and the Return of Individual Research Results. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):593-604.
Conrad Vincent Fernandez, Shaureen Taweel, Eric D. Kodish & Charles Weijer, Disclosure of Research Result to Research Participants: Needs and Attitudes of Adolescents and Parents.
Anne Marie Tassé (2011). The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):621-630.
Conrad V. Fernandez, Darcy Santor, Charles Weijer, Caron Strahlendorf, Albert Moghrabi, Rebecca Pentz, Jun Gao & Eric Kodish, The Return of Research Results to Participants: Pilot Questionnaire of Adolescents and Parents of Children with Cancer.
Lee Black & Kelly A. McClellan (2011). Familial Communication of Research Results: A Need to Know? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):605-613.
Conrad V. Fernandez, Eric Kodish, Susan Shurin & Charles Weijer, Offering to Return Results to Research Participants: Attitudes and Needs of Principal Investigators in the Children's Oncology Group.
Christiane Auray-Blais & Johane Patenaude (2006). A Biobank Management Model Applicable to Biomedical Research. BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-9.
Jean V. McHale (2011). Accountability, Governance and Biobanks: The Ethics and Governance Committee as Guardian or as Toothless Tiger? [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 19 (3):231-246.
Mairi Levitt (2011). Relating to Participants: How Close Do Biobanks and Donors Really Want to Be? [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 19 (3):220-230.
L. I. U. Min & H. U. Qingli (2012). A Proposed Approach to Informed Consent for Biobanks in China. Bioethics 9702:222-227.
Bartha Maria Knoppers & Emmanuelle Lévesque (2011). INTRODUCTION: Return of Research Results: How Should Research Results Be Handled? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):574-576.
K. S. Steinsbekk & B. Solberg (2011). Biobanks--When is Re-Consent Necessary? Public Health Ethics 4 (3):236-250.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy & Kathy Hudson (2008). Public Expectations for Return of Results From Large-Cohort Genetic Research. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):36 – 43.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-11-16
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?