David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (forthcoming)
Digital pictures can be type-identical in respect of colours, shapes and sizes (allographic), but they are not tokens of notational systems, because the types under which they are identical have vague limits and do not meet the requirements for notational characters. Digital display devices are designed to instantiate only limited ranges of objective properties (light intensities, sizes and shapes). Those ranges keep differences in objective magnitudes below sensory discrimination thresholds, and thus define objective conditions sufficient, but not necessary, for the phenomenal type-identity of pictures. The fact that digital pictures are types shows that pictures are not necessarily autographic. Moreover, the reasons why digital pictures are allographic (essentially, the consistent manipulation of sub-phenomenal information) could in principle also be made to apply to non-digital pictures.
|Keywords||identity vagueness photography|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Zeimbekis (2012). Digital Pictures, Sampling, and Vagueness: The Ontology of Digital Pictures. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (1):43-53.
Markos Hadjioannou (2012). From Light to Byte: Toward an Ethics of Digital Cinema. University of Minnesota Press.
Patricia Pisters (2012). The Neuro-Image: A Deleuzian Film-Philosophy of Digital Screen Culture. Stanford University Press.
John Zeimbekis (forthcoming). The Ontology of Digital Pictures. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.
Robert Hopkins (1997). Pictures and Beauty. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97 (2):177–194.
Joel Snyder (1983). Photography and Ontology. Grazer Philosophische Studien 19:21-34.
Dan Cavedon-Taylor (2013). Photographically Based Knowledge. Episteme 10 (3):283-297.
Jan Westerhoff (2005). Logical Relations Between Pictures. Journal of Philosophy 102 (12):603 - 623.
Vera Apfelthaler & Julia Köhne (eds.) (2007). Gendered Memories: Transgressions in German and Israeli Film and Theatre. Turia + Kant.
Dominic Lopes (1996). Understanding Pictures. Oxford University Press.
Jiri Benovsky (2011). Three Kinds of Realism About Photographs. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 25 (4):375-395.
Joohan Kim (2001). Phenomenology of Digital-Being. Human Studies 24 (1-2):87-111.
Estrid Sørensen (2011). Comment on Norm Friesen's. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 15 (3):206-208.
Added to index2011-02-23
Total downloads98 ( #18,937 of 1,700,362 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #62,577 of 1,700,362 )
How can I increase my downloads?