Deadly pluralism? Why death-concept, death-definition, death-criterion and death-test pluralism should be allowed, even though it creates some problems

Bioethics 23 (8):450-459 (2009)
Death concept, death definition, death criterion and death test pluralism has been described by some as a problematic approach. Others have claimed it to be a promising way forward within modern pluralistic societies. This article describes the New Jersey Death Definition Law and the Japanese Transplantation Law. Both of these laws allow for more than one death concept within a single legal system. The article discusses a philosophical basis for these laws starting from John Rawls' understanding of comprehensive doctrines, reasonable pluralism and overlapping consensus. It argues for the view that a certain legal pluralism in areas of disputed metaphysical, philosophical and/or religious questions should be allowed, as long as the disputed questions concern the individual and the resulting policy, law or acts based on the policy/law, do not harm the lives of other individuals to an intolerable extent. However, while this death concept, death definition, death criterion and death test pluralism solves some problems, it creates others
Keywords metaphysics  Japan  death  New Jersey  Rawls  pluralism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00669.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,675
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Amir Halevy (2001). Beyond Brain Death? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (5):493 – 501.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Sarah Hansen (2012). Terri Schiavo and the Language of Biopolitics. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (1):91-112.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

66 ( #69,343 of 1,938,950 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #218,490 of 1,938,950 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.