David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 13 (1):173-196 (2004)
One of the primordial functions of the brain is the acquisition of knowledge. The apparatus that it has evolved to do so is flexible enough to allow it to acquire knowledge about unambiguous conditions on the one hand , and about situations that are capable of two or more interpretations, each one of which has equal validity with the others. However, in the latter instance, we can only be conscious of one interpretation at any given moment. The study of ambiguity thus gives us some insights into how activity at different stations of the brain can result in a micro-consciousness for an attribute, and also tell us something about interactions between different cerebral areas that result in several potential micro-conscious correlates, though only one predominates at any given time. Finally, the study of ambiguity also gives us insights into the neurological machinery that artists have tapped to create the ambiguity that is commonly a hallmark of great works of art
|Keywords||*Brain *Consciousness States *Neurology *Uncertainty|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Alessia Pannese (2012). A Gray Matter of Taste: Sound Perception, Music Cognition, and Baumgarten's Aesthetics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (3):594-601.
Similar books and articles
Alan Beretta (2000). Why the TDH Fails to Contribute to a Neurology of Syntax. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):23-23.
Todd E. Feinberg (1997). Some Interesting Perturbations of the Self in Neurology. Seminars in Neurology 17:129-35.
Eelco F. M. Wijdicks, William R. Bamlet, Boby V. Maramattom, Edward M. Manno & Robyn L. McClelland (2006). Does the FOUR Score Correctly Diagnose the Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States?: Reply. Annals of Neurology 60 (6):745.
Pavel Ortinski & Kimford J. Meador (2004). Neuronal Mechanisms of Conscious Awareness. Archives of Neurology 61 (7):1017-1020.
James L. Bernat (2002). Questions Remaining About the Minimally Conscious State. Neurology 58 (3):337-338.
A. Salazar, Vance S. Grafman J. & Ludlow Dillon J. D. (1986). Consciousness and Amnesia After Penetrating Head Injury: Neurology and Anatomy. Neurology 36:178-87.
Vilayanur S. Ramachandran & William Hirstein (1998). Three Laws of Qualia: What Neurology Tells Us About the Biological Functions of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 4 (4-5):429-57.
Nicholas D. Schiff (2004). The Neurology of Impaired Consciousness: Challenges for Cognitive Neuroscience. In Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences. Mit Press. 1121-1132.
Joseph J. Fins & F. Plum (2004). Neurological Diagnosis is More Than a State of Mind: Diagnostic Clarity and Impaired Consciousness. Archives of Neurology 61 (9):1354-1355.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #76,980 of 1,410,123 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,589 of 1,410,123 )
How can I increase my downloads?