Being Charitable to Scientific Controversies
The Monist 93 (4):640-656 (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTamás Demeter & Gábor Á Zemplén (2010). Being Charitable to Scientific Controversies: On the Demonstrativity of Newton's Experimentum Crucis. The Monist 93 (4):640-656.
William Goodwin (2013). Structure and Scientific Controversies. Topoi 32 (1):101-110.
Marcelo Dascal (2001). Controversies and Epistemology. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:159-192.
John W. Dienhart (1988). Charitable Investments: A Strategy for Improving the Business Environment. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):63 - 71.
Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.) (2000). Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Jeanine Czubaroff (1997). The Public Dimension Of Scientific Controversies. Argumentation 11 (1):51-74.
Mircea Flonta (1996). Does the Scientific Paper Accurately Mirror the Very Grounds of Scientific Assessment? Theoria 11 (3):19-31.
Mircea Flonta (1996). Does the Scientific Paper Accurately Mirror the Very Grounds of Scientific Assessment? Theoria 11 (3):19-31.
James D. Werbel & Suzanne M. Carter (2002). The Ceo's Influence on Corporate Foundation Giving. Journal of Business Ethics 40 (1):47 - 60.
David Campbell & Richard Slack (2007). The Influence of Mutual Status on Rates of Corporate Charitable Contributions. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (2):191 - 200.
Maurizio Mamiani (2000). The Structure of a Scientific Controversy: Hooke Versus Newton About Colors. In Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
T. Shanahan (2001). Methodological and Contextual Factors in the Dawkins/Gould Dispute Over Evolutionary Progress. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (1):127-151.
Maurizio Mamiani (2000). Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2012-03-18Total downloads1 ( #274,921 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,119 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
