David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 26 (3-4):207 - 218 (1974)
I defend a slightly modified version of geach's rule r, I.E., That although both a and b are g, It is possible for a to be the same f as b and a different h than b, Provided that the question whether a and b are the same g is undecidable. Answering those who object to relative identity I claim that they tacitly adhere to a false fregean view, I.E., That one cannot use a singular term to denote an entity x if it is not true that for every y, X=y or not x=y. I show, However, That such terms are, And must be, Used by every empirically oriented language with finite or infinite predicative arsenal, And hence relative identity is more handy than absolute identity. Finally I give a version of leibniz's law for relative identity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nick Trakakis (1997). The Absolutist Theory of Omnipotence. Sophia 36 (2):55-78.
Christopher Hughes Conn (2012). Relative Identity, Singular Reference, and the Incarnation : A Response to Le Poidevin. Religious Studies 48 (1):61 - 82.
Similar books and articles
E. J. Borowski (1975). Diachronic Identity as Relative Identity. Philosophical Quarterly 25 (100):271-276.
Harold W. Noonan (1980). Objects and Identity: An Examination of the Relative Identity Thesis and its Consequences. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada [by] Kluwer Boston.
Massimiliano Carrara (2009). Relative Identity and the Number of Artifacts. Techné 13 (2):108-122.
P. Garbacz (2004). Subsumption and Relative Identity. Axiomathes 14 (4):341-360.
E. M. Zemach (1982). Schematic Objects and Relative Identity. Noûs 16 (2):295-305.
P. Tappenden (2000). Identity and Probability in Everett's Multiverse. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (1):99-114.
Eddy M. Zemach (1969). Personal Identity Without Criteria. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 47 (December):344-353.
David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (1998). On Defending Deontology. Ratio 11 (1):37–54.
Massimiliano Carrara & Elisabetta Sacchi (2007). Cardinality and Identity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (5):539 - 556.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #61,937 of 1,096,705 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,267 of 1,096,705 )
How can I increase my downloads?