David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
We come to the full possession of our power of drawing inferences, the last of all our faculties; for it is not so much a natural gift as a long and difficult art. The history of its practice would make a grand subject for a book. The medieval schoolmen, following the Romans, made logic the earliest of a boy's studies after grammar, as being very easy. So it was as they understood it. Its fundamental principle, according to them, was, that all knowledge rests either on authority or reason; but that whatever is deduced by reason depends ultimately on a premiss derived from authority. Accordingly, as soon as a boy was perfect in the syllogistic procedure, his intellectual kit of tools was held to be complete.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
B. Fischer & H. Weber (1997). Two Attentional Components for Two Purposes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):770-771.
Isaac Levi (1991). The Fixation of Belief and its Undoing: Changing Beliefs Through Inquiry. Cambridge University Press.
Sanford C. Goldberg (2002). Belief and its Linguistic Expression: Toward a Belief Box Account of First-Person Authority. Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):65-76.
Henrik Rydenfelt (2011). Epistemic Norms and Democracy: A Response to Talisse. Metaphilosophy 42 (5):572-588.
Bryce Huebner (2009). Troubles with Stereotypes for Spinozan Minds. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):63-92.
Robert B. Talisse (2001). On the Supposed Tension in Peirce's “Fixation of Belief”. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:561-569.
Jeff Kasser (2011). How Settled Are Settled Beliefs in “the Fixation of Belief”? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (2):226-247.
Donald J. Cunningham, James B. Schreiber & Connie M. Moss (2005). Belief, Doubt and Reason: C. S. Peirce on Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (2):177–189.
Emer O'Hagan (2005). Belief, Normativity and the Constitution of Agency. Philosophical Explorations 8 (1):39 – 52.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #306,128 of 1,088,624 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?