Interaction Studies 12 (2):233-261 (2011)
|Abstract||Social influence and social learning are important to the survival of many organisms, and certain forms of social learning also may have important implications for their underlying cognitive processes. The various forms of social influence and learning are discussed with special emphasis on the mechanisms that may be responsible for opaque imitation (the copying of a response that the observer cannot easily see when it produces the response). Three procedures are examined, the results of which may qualify as opaque imitation: the bidirectional control procedure, the two- action procedure, and the do-as-I-do procedure. Variables that appear to affect the emergence of opaque imitation are identified and other complex forms of response copying are discussed. Keywords: bidirectional control procedure; contagion; emulation; imitation; local enhancement; object movement reenactment; observational conditioning; opaque imitation; social enhancement; social facilitation; social influence; social learning; stimulus enhancement; two action procedure|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter E. Midford (1998). High-Level Social Learning in Apes: Imitation or Observation-Assisted Planning? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):698-699.
Thomas R. Zentall (1998). Insufficient Support for Either Response “Priming” or “Program-Level Imitation”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):708-709.
Mark Gardner & Cecilia Heyes (1998). Splitting, Lumping, and Priming. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):690-691.
Andrew M. Colman (1998). Modelling Imitation with Sequential Games. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):686-687.
Dietmar Todt (1998). Hierarchical Learning of Song in Birds: A Case of Vocal Imitation? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):702-703.
Elliot C. Brown & Martin Brüne (2012). The Role of Prediction in Social Neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6 (147):147-147.
Susan L. Hurley (2006). Active Perception and Perceiving Action: The Shared Circuits Model. In Tamar Szab Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press.
Paisley Livingston (1994). What is Mimetic Desire? Philosophical Psychology 7 (3):291 – 305.
Ludwig Huber (1998). Movement Imitation as Faithful Copying in the Absence of Insight. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):694-694.
Susan L. Hurley (2006). Bypassing Conscious Control: Unconscious Imitation, Media Violence, and Freedom of Speech. In Susan Pockett, William P. Banks & Shaun Gallagher (eds.), Does Consciousness Cause Behavior? MIT Press.
Susan L. Hurley (2008). The Shared Circuits Model. How Control, Mirroring, and Simulation Can Enable Imitation and Mind Reading. Behavioral and Brain Science 31 (1):1-22.
Richard W. Byrne & Anne E. Russon (1998). Common Ground on Which to Approach the Origins of Higher Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):709-717.
Atsuko Tsuji (2010). Experience in the Very Moment of Writing: Reconsidering Walter Benjamin's Theory of Mimesis. Journal of Philosophy of Education 44 (1):125-136.
Richard Moore (2013). Imitation and Conventional Communication. Biology and Philosophy 28 (3):481-500.
Added to index2011-07-27
Total downloads12 ( #101,180 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?