David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):631-651 (2010)
The end of history by Fukuyama is mainly based on Hegel’s treatise of the end of history and Kojeve’s corresponding interpretation. But Hegel’s end of history is a purely philosophical question, i.e., an ontological premise that must be fulfilled to complete absolute knowledge. When Kojeve further demonstrates its universal and homogeneous state, Fukuyama extends it into a political view: The victory of the Western system of freedom and democracy marks the end of the development of human history and Marxist theory and practice. This is a misunderstanding of Hegel. Marx analyzes, scientifically, the historical limitation of Western capitalism and maintains, by way of a kind of revolutionary teleology, the expectation of and belief in human liberation, which is the highest historical goal. His philosophy of history is hence characterized by theoretical elements from both historical scientificalness and historical teleology.
|Keywords||history the end of history Marx’s philosophy of history|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jacques Derrida (2006). Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. Routledge.
G. W. F. Hegel (1979). Phenomenology of Spirit. OUP Oxford.
Karl Löwith (1964/1984). From Hegel to Nietzsche. Garland Pub..
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chris Hughes (2011). Liberal Democracy as the End of History: Fukuyama and Postmodern Challenges. Routledge.
Peter Loptson (2007). Re-Examining the 'End of History' Idea and World History Since Hegel. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:175-182.
Chris Hughes (2012). Dialogue Between Fukuyama's Account of the End of History and Derrida's Hauntology. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 7 (18):13-26.
Nikolaĭ Berdi͡aev (2009/1962). The Meaning of History. Semantron Press.
Risto Pitkänen (2010). Art and its History. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 21 (39).
Alan M. Olson (2000). Epochal Consciousness and the Philosophy of History. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:159-171.
Immanuel Kant (1963). On History. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill.
Panagiotis Thanassas (2009). Hegel's Hermeneutics of History. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (1):70-94.
Jeffrey Friedman (1989). The New Consensus: I. The Fukuyama Thesis. Critical Review 3 (3-4):373-410.
Klaus Brinkmann (2000). System and History in Hegel. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:169-177.
Sergei Prozorov (2008). Russian Postcommunism and the End of History. Studies in East European Thought 60 (3):207 - 230.
Leonard Mendes Marsak (ed.) (1977). The Nature of Historical Inquiry. R. E. Krieger Publishing Company.
Howard Williams (1997). Francis Fukuyama and the End of History. University of Wales Press.
Thom Brooks (2013/2009). Hegel's Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right. Edinburgh University Press.
Added to index2010-12-04
Total downloads26 ( #66,175 of 1,100,501 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #289,155 of 1,100,501 )
How can I increase my downloads?