David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:15 - 23 (1990)
For the logical positivists, protocol statements are points of contact between experience and knowledge. But within the Vienna Circle there were controversies with regard to how protocol statements are to play the key role in the process of verification. The uniqueness of Schlick's concept of protocol statement consists in the unity between its intelligibility and its validity. When the protocol statements are formulated during observations, the statements themselves are not verified but the whole body of the theory is. The momentary experience confirms the protocol statement at the moment, and the satisfaction of the knower attained through confirmations is the end of scientific inquiries.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas E. Uebel (1993). Neurath's Protocol Statements: A Naturalistic Theory of Data and Pragmatic Theory of Theory Acceptance. Philosophy of Science 60 (4):587-607.
Alan Jotkowitz, S. Glick & B. Gesundheit (2008). A Case Against Justified Non-Voluntary Active Euthanasia (the Groningen Protocol). American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):23 – 26.
Thomas Uebel (2009). Neurath's Protocol Statements Revisited: Sketch of a Theory of Scientific Testimony. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):4-13.
Arjen Hommersom, John-jules Meyer & Erik De vink (2004). Update Semantics of Security Protocols. Synthese 142 (2):229 - 267.
Nikola Nottelmann (2006). Otto Neurath on the Structure of Protocol Sentences; a New Approach to an Interpretative Puzzle. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (1):165 - 186.
Tom Tomlinson (1993). The Irreversibility of Death: Reply to Cole. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3 (2):157-165.
Thomas E. Uebel (ed.) (1992). Overcoming Logical Positivism From Within: The Emergence of Neurath's Naturalism in the Vienna Circle's Protocol Sentence Debate. Rodopi.
Sandra Bruneau (1998). Adding Pep (Protocol, Ethics, and Policies) to the Preparation of New Professionals. Ethics and Behavior 8 (3):249 – 267.
Thomas Oberdan (1998). The Vienna Circle's 'Anti-Foundationalism'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (2):297-308.
Corrado Viafora (1999). Toward a Methodology for the Ethical Analysis of Clinical Practice. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (3):283-297.
Thomas Uebel (2007). Interpreting Neurath's Protocols. Reply to Nottelmann. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (2):383 - 391.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads2 ( #729,678 of 1,937,259 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,797 of 1,937,259 )
How can I increase my downloads?