David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Tradition and Discovery 30 (2):11-23 (2003)
In this paper, I attempt to create a dialogue between the Wittgensteinian tradition and the Polanyian tradition concerning the understanding of the concept of tacit knowledge/knowing from the perspective of the problem of articulation. Norwegian philosopher Harald Grimen argues for a distinction between the strong thesis of tacit knowledge and the weaker theses of tacit knowledge. The former highlights the logical gap between our knowledge and our capacity for verbal articulation, which is not the case for the weaker theses. Inspired by this important distinction, I claim that there are actually two meanings of Polanyi¡’s concept of tacit knowledge/knowing. Finally, I try to bring out the relevance of the ongoing discussion on tacit knowledge/knowing to contemporary Chinese philosophy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stephen G. Henry (2011). A Clinical Perspective on Tacit Knowledge and Its Varieties. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):13-17.
Dale Cannon (2002). Construing Polanyi's Tacit Knowing as Knowing by Acquaintance Rather Than Knowing by Representation. Tradition and Discovery 29 (2):26-43.
Charles Lowney (2011). Ineffable, Tacit, Explicable and Explicit. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):18-37.
Auli Toom (2012). Considering the Artistry and Epistemology of Tacit Knowledge and Knowing. Educational Theory 62 (6):621-640.
Jon Cogburn (2004). Inferentialism and Tacit Knowledge. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):503 - 524.
Tim Ray (2009). Rethinking Polanyi's Concept of Tacit Knowledge: From Personal Knowing to Imagined Institutions. [REVIEW] Minerva 47 (1):75-92.
Yu Zhenhua (2004). Kant's Notion of Judgment From the Perspective of the Theory of Tacit Knowing. Tradition and Discovery 31 (1):24-35.
Harry Collins (2011). Analysing Tacit Knowledge. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):38-42.
Zhenhua Yu (2006). Tacit Knowledge. Tradition and Discovery 33 (3):9-25.
Andrea Pozzali (2007). Tacit Knowledge, Implicit Learning and Scientific Reasoning. Mind and Society 7 (2):227-237.
Percy Hammond (2003). Personal Knowledge and Human Creativity. Tradition and Discovery 30 (2):24-34.
Jonathan Perraton & Iona Tarrant (2007). What Does Tacit Knowledge Actually Explain? Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (3):353-370.
Walter van Herck (1999). The Role Of Tacit Knowledge In Religion. Tradition and Discovery 26 (2):21-30.
Kyle Takaki (2009). Embodied Knowing. Tradition and Discovery 36 (2):26-39.
William D. Stillwell (2003). Tacit Knowledge And The Work Of Ikujiro Nonaka. Tradition and Discovery 30 (1):19-22.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads77 ( #54,628 of 1,902,204 )
Recent downloads (6 months)23 ( #32,239 of 1,902,204 )
How can I increase my downloads?