David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 175 (1):47 - 68 (2010)
This article proposes a four-layer semantic structure for common nouns. Each layer matches up with a semantic entity of a certain type in Montague’s intensional semantics. It is argued that a common noun denotes a sense and a concept, which are functions. For any given context, the sense of a term determines its extensions and the concept denoted by the term specifies its intensions. Intensions are treated as sets of senses. The membership relation between a sense and an intension is a soft kind and is expressed in the form of a generic sentence. Such a layered structure explains various “degrees of publicity” of a language. The result we present clarifies the confusions existing in the ordinary understanding of “sense,” “intension,” and “concept.” It also has promising applications in interpreting metaphors and revealing the relationship between generics and metaphors.
|Keywords||Sense Reference Intension Concept|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gottlob Frege (1991). Posthumous Writings. Wiley-Blackwell.
Gottlob Frege & Michael Beaney (eds.) (1997). The Frege Reader. Blackwell Publishers.
Richard Montague (1975). Formal Philosophy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):573-578.
Richard Montague (1974). Towards a Proper Treatment of Quantification in English. In Richmond H. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy. Yale University Press
Alonzo Church (1973). Outline of a Revised Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation (Part I). Noûs 7 (1):24-33.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gregory Bochner (2013). The Metasyntactic Interpretation of Two-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):611-626.
David Nicolas (2004). Is There Anything Characteristic About the Meaning of a Count Noun? Revue de la Lexicologie 18.
Chris Fraser (2007). Language and Ontology in Early Chinese Thought. Philosophy East and West 57 (4):420-456.
Michael De Medeiros (2010). Common Sense. Weigl Publishers.
David Nicolas (2004). The Semantics of Nouns Derived From Gradable Adjectives. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 8. 197-207.
David Thomas (1978). Sociology and Common Sense. Inquiry 21 (1-4):1 – 32.
Nino Cocchiarella (2009). Mass Nouns in a Logic of Classes as Many. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):343-361.
Mark Moyer (2008). Why We Shouldn't Swallow Worm Slices: A Case Study in Semantic Accommodation. Noûs 42 (1):109–138.
Radu J. Bogdan (1989). Does Semantics Run the Psyche? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (June):687-700.
Henry Laycock (2005). Mass Nouns, Count Nouns and Non-Count Nouns. In Alex Barber (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier
Added to index2009-04-27
Total downloads24 ( #152,443 of 1,790,223 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #266,356 of 1,790,223 )
How can I increase my downloads?