On the general form of the Grue Paradox
| Abstract | The grue paradox, also called the new riddle of induction, posed a great challenge to the common understanding about induction. This paper shows that there is a close relation between the grue paradox and the problem of conditionals. This paper presents a general form of the grue predicate. Based on the general form, this paper argues that this kind of predicates can not be used for induction and prediction. | |||||||||
| Keywords | The grue paradox Induction the new riddle of induction | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
|
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Edward S. Shirley (1981). An Unnoticed Flaw in Barker and Achinstein's Solution to Goodman's New Riddle of Induction. Philosophy of Science 48 (4):611-617.
John Moreland (1976). On Projecting Grue. Philosophy of Science 43 (3):363-377.
Rainer Gottlob (1995). Emeralds Are No Chameleons — Why “Grue” is Not Projectible for Induction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26 (2):259 - 268.
Bipin Indurkhya (1990). Some Remarks on the Rationality of Induction. Synthese 85 (1):95 - 114.
Adina L. Roskies (2008). Robustness and the New Riddle Revived. Ratio 21 (2):218–230.
John D. Norton (2006). How the Formal Equivalence of Grue and Green Defeats What is New in the New Riddle of Induction. Synthese 150 (2):185 - 207.
Robert Kowalenko (2012). Reply to Israel on the New Riddle of Induction. Philosophia 40 (3):549-552.
Rosemarie Rheinwald (1993). An Epistemic Solution to Goodman's New Riddle of Induction. Synthese 95 (1):55 - 76.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-05-01Total downloads73 ( #11,372 of 549,005 )Recent downloads (6 months)38 ( #923 of 549,005 )How can I increase my downloads? |

