An Ethics of Dissensus: Postmodernity, Feminism, and the Politics of Radical Democracy
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Stanford University Press (2001)
What kind of challenge does sexual and racial difference pose for postmodern ethics? What is the relation between ethical obligation and feminist interpretations of embodiment, passion, and eros? How can we negotiate between ethical responsibility for the Other and democratic struggles against domination, injustice, and equality, on the one hand, and internal conflicts within the subject, on the other? We cannot address such questions, Ziarek argues, without putting into dialogue discourses that have hitherto been segregated: postmodern ethics, feminism, race theory, and the idea of radical democracy. Addressing a constellation of diverse thinkers - including Emmanuel Levinas, Patricia Williams, Jean-François Lyotard, Michel Foucault, Frantz Fanon, Julia Kristeva, and Luce Irigaray - the author proposes a new conception of ethics, an ethics of dissensus that rethinks the relation between freedom and obligation in a double context of embodiment and antagonism.
|Keywords||Ethics, Modern Postmodernism Feminist ethics Democracy Moral and ethical aspects|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$42.81 used (27% off) $44.74 new (23% off) $57.95 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ324.P67.Z53 2001|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Robin May Schott (2004). The Atrocity Paradigm and the Concept of Forgiveness. Hypatia 19 (4):204 - 211.
Glen Whelan (2013). Corporate Constructed and Dissent Enabling Public Spheres: Differentiating Dissensual From Consensual Corporate Social Responsibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 115 (4):755-769.
Miri Rozmarin (2005). Power, Freedom, and Individuality: Foucault and Sexual Difference. [REVIEW] Human Studies 28 (1):1 - 14.
Erik L. Peterson (2008). William Bateson From "Balanoglossus" to "Materials for the Study of Variation": The Transatlantic Roots of Discontinuity and the (Un)Naturalness of Selection. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 41 (2):267 - 305.
Silvia Edling (2012). The Paradox of Meaning Well While Causing Harm: A Discussion About the Limits of Tolerance Within Democratic Societies. Journal of Moral Education 41 (4):457-471.
Similar books and articles
Jose V. Ciprut (ed.) (2009). Ethics, Politics, and Democracy: From Primordial Principles to Prospective Practices. MIT Press.
Virginia Held (1993). Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. University of Chicago Press.
Yannis Stavrakakis (1997). Ambiguous Democracy and the Ethics of Psychoanalysis. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (2):79-96.
Philippe van Haute & Peg Birmingham (eds.) (1995). Dissensus Communis: Between Ethics and Politics. Kok Pharos.
Marie Carrière (2006). Feminism as a Radical Ethics? Questions for Feminist Researchers in the Humanities. Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4):245-260.
Jeremy Moon & Bruce Stone (eds.) (2002). Power and Freedom in Modern Politics. University of Western Australia Press.
Eric Anthony Beerbohm (2012). In Our Name: The Ethics of Democracy. Princeton University Press.
Christine E. Gudorf (2004). Feminism and Postmodernism in Susan Frank Parsons. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (3):519 - 543.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?