David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Horizons 11 (3):359-377 (2010)
In coming to words, language “reserves” itself: it holds back its event, keeping it illegible and silent. It is possible to see much of modern innovative or “experimental” poetry as such an experience of reticence and stillness, an experiment of language listening to itself “speaking” in order to allow the force of the illegible to come to speech. How this silence both limits what can be said and holds what has been written open to the possibilities of saying otherwise comes from the “restraint” characteristic of the specific way in which language “speaks,” that is, arrives each time singularly as words precisely by withholding this very arrival from signification. Myung Mi Kim’s poetry stands out among contemporary American poets precisely for its specific attentiveness to this simultaneously “generative” and “constraining” force of silence. To understand better the workings of this force of silence, I examine Kim’s poetry in the context of Heidegger’s reflection on language, specifically his point about the withdrawal and restraint “essential” to the unfolding of language. I suggest that this withdrawal marks the poietic momentum of language, which can be traced, though, only by way of a listening response. This listening response becomes in turn a kind of constraint under which poetic thinking operates, a holding back of assertions and statements in favor of a listening which responds precisely to how the saying withholds itself from what comes to be said. Exploring the proximity between Kim’s poetry and Heidegger’s thinking, this essay examines how this withdrawal—a restraint at play in language itself--necessitates the attitude of poetic “reservedness.”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rae Langton (2007). Disenfranchised Silence. In Michael Smith, Robert Goodin & Geoffrey Geoffrey (eds.), Common Minds. Oxford. 199.
Anna Strhan (2011). Religious Language as Poetry: Heidegger's Challenge. Heythrop Journal 52 (6):926-938.
Youru Wang (2001). Liberating Oneself From the Absolutized Boundary of Language: A Liminological Approach to the Interplay of Speech and Silence in Chan Buddhism. Philosophy East and West 51 (1):83-99.
Kalpana Seshadri (2012/2011). Humanimal: Race, Law, Language. University of Minnesota Press.
Kalpana Seshadri-Crooks (2012/2011). Humanimal: Race, Law, Language. University of Minnesota Press.
Joseph J. Kockelmans (1972). On Heidegger and Language. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
Christian Lotz (2011). Poetry as Anti-Discourse: Formalism, Hermeneutics, and the Poetics of Paul Celan. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 44 (4):491-510.
Don Ihde (1976). Listening And Voice: A Phenomenology Of Sound. Ohio University Press.
Richard Fleming (2009). Evil and Silence. Paradigm Publishers.
Chien-Hsing Ho (2012). The Nonduality of Speech and Silence: A Comparative Analysis of Jizang’s Thought on Language and Beyond. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (1):1-19.
Mathew Abbott (2010). The Poetic Experience of the World. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (4):493-516.
Cătălina Elena Dobre & Rafael García Pavón (2008). Abraham y la Ética del Silencio en el Pensamiento de Søren A. Kierkegaard. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:515-526.
Added to index2011-02-07
Total downloads13 ( #142,452 of 1,692,888 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #193,926 of 1,692,888 )
How can I increase my downloads?