David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (2):149-165 (2007)
John Dewey and Bertrand Russell visited China at around the same time in 1920. Both profoundly influenced China during the great transition period of this country. This article will focus on the differences between the two great figures that influenced China in the 1920s. This comparison will examine the following five aspects: 1. Deweyanization vs. Russellization; 2. Dewey’s “Populism” vs. Russell’s “Aristocraticism”; 3. Dewey’s “Syntheticalism” vs. Russell’s “Analyticalism”; 4. Dewey’s “Realism” vs. Russell’s “Romanticism”; 5. Dewey’s “Conservatism” vs. Russell’s “Radicalism”. This examination will highlight that, although their visit left indelible impressions among Chinese intellecturals, for the radical Marx–Leninists, any Western philosophy and socio-political theories, including Dewey’s and Russell’s, were prejudicial, outworn, and even counterrevolutionary. Soon “Marxi–Leninization” was gradually substituted for “Deweyanization” and “Russellization.”.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Brian Patrick Hendley, George Kimball Plochmann & Robert S. Brumbaugh (2010). Dewey, Russell, Whitehead: Philosophers as Educators. Southern Illinois University Press.
Youlan Feng (1948). A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. New York, Macmillan Co..
John Dewey & John J. McDermott (1973). The Philosophy of John Dewey. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sidney Hook (1950/1967). John Dewey: Philosopher of Science and Freedom. New York, Barnes & Noble.
Walter Feinberg (2006). "Back to the Future": Philosophy of Education as an Instrument of its Time. Education and Culture 22 (2):7-18.
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2010). Dewey and the Subject-Matter of Science. In John R. Shook & Paul Kurtz (eds.), Dewey's Enduring Impact: Essays on America's Philosopher. Prometheus Books 73--86.
Xu Yibao (2003). Bertrand Russell and the Introduction of Mathematical Logic in China. History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (3):181-196.
Sor-Hoon Tan (2011). The Dao of Politics: Li (Rituals/Rites) and Laws as Pragmatic Tools of Government. Philosophy East and West 61 (3):468-491.
Sor-Hoon Tan (2011). How Can a Chinese Democracy Be Pragmatic? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (2):196-225.
John E. Smith (1985). Pragmatism at Work; Dewey's Lectures in China. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 12 (3):231-259.
Alan Ryan (1996). Russell: The Last Great Radical? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (2):247-266.
Scott L. Pratt (1998). Inquiry and Analysis: Dewey and Russell on Philosophy. Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (2/3):101-122.
Tom Burke (1994). Dewey's New Logic: A Reply to Russell. University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #114,246 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #147,227 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?