Could extended objects be made out of simple parts? An argument for "atomless gunk"

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2108463
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Jonathan Schaffer (2009). Spacetime the One Substance. Philosophical Studies 145 (1):131 - 148.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Andrej Krause (2006). Are Bolzano's Substances Simple? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):543-562.
J. R. G. Williams (2006). Illusions of Gunk. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):493–513.
Joshua Spencer (2010). A Tale of Two Simples. Philosophical Studies 148 (2):167 - 181.
Gregory Fowler (2008). A Gunk-Friendly Maxcon. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):611 – 627.
Josh Parsons (2008). Hudson on Location. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):427 - 435.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

182 ( #10,583 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

17 ( #45,081 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.