David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 43 (2):211 - 224 (1983)
The main point of this paper has been to show that the concept of evaluative incompleteness deserves consideration. In addition, I have suggested that it is plausible to accept that certain states of affairs in fact are evaluatively incomplete. But I have not sought to prove that this is so; indeed, I do not know how such proof might be given. Just which states of affairs, if any, are evaluatively incomplete is an extremely vexed question, and it is not one to which I have attempted to supply any systematic answer. My aim has been merely to point out that it is arguable that certain states of affairs are evaluatively incomplete — a fact that ought not to be overlooked due to an unquestioning acceptance of (II) and a fact which, certainly, ought not to be ruled out by fiat due to an adherence to definitions and assumptions which imply that (II) is false
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
W. D. Ross (2002). The Right and the Good. Clarendon Press.
John Jamieson Carswell Smart & Bernard Williams (1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press.
Roderick M. Chisholm (1966). Theory of Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
G. E. Moore (1903). Principia Ethica. Dover Publications.
George Edward Moore (1942). A Reply to My Critics. In Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore. Open Court
Citations of this work BETA
Kris McDaniel (2014). A Moorean View of the Value of Lives. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95 (4):23-46.
Similar books and articles
D. M. Armstrong (1997). A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge University Press.
Noah Lemos (1998). Organic Unities. Journal of Ethics 2 (4):321-337.
Robert F. Card (2004). Consequentialist Teleology and the Valuation of States of Affairs. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):253-265.
Alberto Voltolini (2002). Possible Objects and Possible States of Affairs in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. In P. Frascolla (ed.), Tractatus logico-philosophicus: Sources, Themes, Perspectives. Università Degli Studi Della Basilicata 129-153.
James D. Rissler (2006). Does Armstrong Need States of Affairs? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):193 – 209.
M. Reicher (ed.) (2009). States of Affairs. Ontos Verlag.
Holger Leerhoff (2008). Bradley's Regress, Russell's States of Affairs, and Some General Remarks on the Problem. Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (2):249-264.
Hans Kraml (1998). States of Affairs. Erkenntnis 48 (2-3):311-324.
Dale Jacquette (2010). Truth Breakers. Topoi 29 (2):153-163.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #235,129 of 1,911,313 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #252,427 of 1,911,313 )
How can I increase my downloads?