Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||On April 7, 2009 the third section of the European Court of Human Rights issued a judgment in the Case of Mendel vs. Sweden, which is of significance not because it adds another precedent to the long standing case law delimitating the scope of Art. 6 European Convention on Human Rights but because it underlines, once again, the inherent obstacle in the Swedish legal system to providing individuals access to courts for a review of administrative decisions by State authorities.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Gregory Lewkowicz, Human Rights, Citizen Rights: The Presuppositions of the American and European Case Law.
Raphael Falk & Sahotra Sarkar (1991). The Real Objective of Mendel's Paper: A Response to Monaghan and Corcos. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):447-451.
Sylvie Bacquet, School Uniforms, Religious Symbols and the Human Rights Act 1998: The 'Purity Ring' Case.
George Letsas (2007). A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. OUP Oxford.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-05-22
Total downloads1 ( #292,081 of 739,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?