David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
On April 7, 2009 the third section of the European Court of Human Rights issued a judgment in the Case of Mendel vs. Sweden, which is of significance not because it adds another precedent to the long standing case law delimitating the scope of Art. 6 European Convention on Human Rights but because it underlines, once again, the inherent obstacle in the Swedish legal system to providing individuals access to courts for a review of administrative decisions by State authorities.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gregory Lewkowicz, Human Rights, Citizen Rights: The Presuppositions of the American and European Case Law.
Raphael Falk & Sahotra Sarkar (1991). The Real Objective of Mendel's Paper: A Response to Monaghan and Corcos. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):447-451.
Sylvie Bacquet, School Uniforms, Religious Symbols and the Human Rights Act 1998: The 'Purity Ring' Case.
George Letsas (2007). A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. OUP Oxford.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-05-22
Total downloads1 ( #306,230 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?