Prohibitions to appeal and art. 6(1) echr - the case of Mendel vs. sweden from April 7, 2009
| Abstract | On April 7, 2009 the third section of the European Court of Human Rights issued a judgment in the Case of Mendel vs. Sweden, which is of significance not because it adds another precedent to the long standing case law delimitating the scope of Art. 6 European Convention on Human Rights but because it underlines, once again, the inherent obstacle in the Swedish legal system to providing individuals access to courts for a review of administrative decisions by State authorities. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesRaphael Falk & Sahotra Sarkar (1991). The Real Objective of Mendel's Paper: A Response to Monaghan and Corcos. Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):447-451.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-05-22Total downloads1 ( #274,830 of 549,093 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,093 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
