David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):397-399 (2002)
For scientific knowledge to be trustworthy, it needs to be dissociated from material interests. Disinterested research also performs other important non-instrumental roles. In particular, academic science has traditionally provided society with reliable, imaginative public knowledge and independent, self-critical expertise. But this type of science is not compatible with the practice of instrumental research, which is typically proprietary, prosaic, pragmatic and partisan. With ever-increasing dependence on commercial or state funding, all modes of knowledge production are merging into a new, ‘post-academic’ research culture which is dominated by utilitarian goals. Growing concern about conflicts of interest is thus a symptom of deep-seated malaise in science and medicine.
|Keywords||knowledge science academic science post-academic science trustworthy research instrumental research|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Katherine McComas (2012). Researcher Views About Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest in Nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):699-717.
Anders Persson, Sven Hemlin & Stellan Welin (2007). Profitable Exchanges for Scientists: The Case of Swedish Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 15 (4):291-304.
T. Ploug & S. Holm (2015). Conflict of Interest Disclosure and the Polarisation of Scientific Communities. Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):356-358.
Similar books and articles
David Hursh (2011). The Politics of Inquiry: Education Research and the "Culture of Science" (Review). Education and Culture 27 (1):73-77.
Heidi Kjærnet (2010). At Arm's Length? Applied Social Science and its Sponsors. Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):161-169.
G. R. Evans & D. E. Packham (2003). Ethical Issues at the University-Industry Interface: A Way Forward? Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (1):3-16.
David B. Resnik (2000). Financial Interests and Research Bias. Perspectives on Science 8 (3):255-285.
J. M. Ziman (2000). Real Science: What It is, and What It Means. Cambridge University Press.
Vincent Norcia (2005). Intellectual Property and the Commercialization of Research and Development. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):203-219.
Vincent di Norcia (2005). Intellectual Property and the Commercialization of Research and Development. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):203-219.
Torsten Wilholt (2006). Design Rules: Industrial Research and Epistemic Merit. Philosophy of Science 73 (1):66-89.
Rose-Mary Sargent, Philosophy of Science in the Public Interest: Useful Knowledge and the Common Good.
John Ziman (2003). Non-Instrumental Roles of Science. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (1):17-27.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #132,874 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #118,705 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?