David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1996)
The principal aim of this book is to develop and defend an analysis of the concept of moral obligation. The analysis is neutral regarding competing substantive theories of obligation, whether consequentialist or deontological in character. What it seeks to do is generate new solutions to a range of philosophical problems concerning obligation and its application. Amongst these problems are deontic paradoxes, the supersession of obligation, conditional obligation, prima facie obligation, actualism and possibilism, dilemmas, supererogation, and cooperation. By virtue of its normative neutrality, the analysis provides a theoretical framework within which competing theories of obligation can be developed and assessed. This study is a major contribution to metaethics that will be of particular interest to all philosophers concerned with normative ethical theory.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$51.73 new (32% off) $51.85 used (31% off) $74.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ1451.Z56 1996|
|ISBN(s)||052103874X 052149706X 9780521497060 9780521038744|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter B. M. Vranas (2007). I Ought, Therefore I Can. Philosophical Studies 136 (2):167 - 216.
Travis Timmerman (2015). Does Scrupulous Securitism Stand-Up to Scrutiny? Two Problems for Moral Securitism and How We Might Fix Them. Philosophical Studies 172 (6):1509-1528.
Nicholas Southwood (2016). “The Thing To Do” Implies “Can”. Noûs 50 (1):61-72.
Bart Streumer (2007). Reasons and Impossibility. Philosophical Studies 136 (3):351-384.
Rob van Someren Greve (2014). 'Ought', 'Can', and Fairness. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):913-922.
Similar books and articles
Suzanne M. Uniacke (2005). Responsibility and Obligation: Some Kantian Directions. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4):461 – 475.
Alex Rajczi (2002). When Can One Requirement Override Another? Philosophical Studies 108 (3):309 - 326.
Nicholas Asher & Daniel Bonevac (1996). Prima Facie Obligation. Studia Logica 57 (1):19-45.
Shay Welch (2012). Social Freedom and Commitment. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):117-134.
David Sobel (1999). Michael J. Zimmerman, The Concept of Moral Obligation:The Concept of Moral Obligation. Ethics 109 (2):468-470.
Hugo Adam Bedau (1971). Military Service and Moral Obligation. Inquiry 14 (1-4):244 – 266.
Andrew J. Dell’Olio (1998). God, the Self, and the Ethics of Virtue. Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):47-70.
Stephen Darwall (2010). Moral Obligation: Form and Substance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (1):31-46.
John F. Crosby (2005). Person and Obligation. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (1):91-119.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads134 ( #29,775 of 1,934,441 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #44,741 of 1,934,441 )
How can I increase my downloads?