Ferré: Organicistic Connectedness—But Still Speciesistic

Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):185 - 190 (1996)
An environmental ethics open to the charge of speciesism would be a weak environmental ethics at best. Ferré criticizes the environmental ethics of Callicott and Rolston, presenting his version of an environmental ethics; one he refers to as organicistic. His version does indeed avoid the pitfalls of the environmental ethics of Callicott and Rolston. But, as I show, the charge of speciesism can be leveled against Ferré (and many others). I suggest that properly understood speciesism is so deeply rooted in our concepts that the only hope lies in what I term a thoughtful speciesism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/27766021
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Jim Cheney (1997). Naturalizing the Problem of Evil. Environmental Ethics 19 (3):299-313.
Jim Cheney (1997). Naturalizing the Problem of Evil. Environmental Ethics 19 (3):299-313.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

5 ( #359,709 of 1,725,465 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,436 of 1,725,465 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.