Kames's Naturalist Aesthetics and the Case of Tragedy
Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7 (2):147-162 (2009)
| Abstract | In this essay, I discuss Kames' aesthetic theory, as presented in his essay, ‘Our Attachment to Objects of Distress’ (concerning the problem of tragedy), and in Elements of Criticism. I argue that Kames' (non-)response to the problem of tragedy – that we find tragedies painful (not pleasing), yet are ‘attracted to them through the workings of the “blind instinct” of sympathy’ – is intended to call the standard formulation of the problem of tragedy (‘why do we find such painful things pleasing?’) into question. This standard formulation, on Kames' view, mistakenly assumes that we cannot be attracted to anything but pleasure, whereas tragedy (among other phenomena) shows that human nature is considerably more complex than this. I argue, further, that Kames' treatment of tragedy exemplifies the character of his aesthetics more broadly: aesthetic values are explained by reference to general laws governing human nature (we are attracted to this sort of thing, averse to that, etc.) – or explanatory naturalism. But Kames also argues that we can, upon reflection, judge that this instinct and this exercise of it is good (as in the case of tragedy, which is, Kames argues, morally educative because it strengthens our sympathy), by contrast to other cases where instincts may not achieve their ends. Thus Kames also proposes a normative aesthetic naturalism, according to which we should educate our instinctual affective responses so that they will be appropriate to their objects and beneficial for the human goods that they are meant to promote | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHenry Home Kames (1758/1976). Essays on the Principles of Morality and Natural Religion: (1758). Olms.
Aaron Smuts (2007). The Paradox of Painful Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 41 (3):59-77.
Henry Home Kames (1751/1976). Essays on the Principles of Morality and Natural Religion. Garland Pub..
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1974). The Birth of Tragedy; or, Hellenism and Pessimism. Gordon Press.
Elisa Galgut (2001). The Poetry and the Pity: Hume's Account of Tragic Pleasure. British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (4):411-424.
S. Shapshay (2012). The Problem with the Problem of Tragedy: Schopenhauer's Solution Revisited. British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):17-32.
Elisa Galgut (2009). Tragedy and Reparation. In Pedro Alexis Tabensky (ed.), The Positive Function of Evil. Palgrave Macmillan.
Eva Dadlez (2011). Ideal Presence: How Kames Solved the Problem of Fiction and Emotion. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):115-133.
Eva Dadlez (2010). Kames on Ideal Presence. Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1):17-25.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-07-11Total downloads22 ( #56,132 of 549,005 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,272 of 549,005 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
