David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (6):739 - 779 (2005)
The semantics of directional prepositions is investigated from the perspective of aspect. What distinguishes telic PPs (like to the house) from atelic PPs (like towards the house), taken as denoting sets of paths, is their algebraic structure: atelic PPs are cumulative, closed under the operation of concatenation, telic PPs are not. Not only does this allow for a natural and compositional account of how PPs contribute to the aspect of a sentence, but it also guides our understanding of the lexical semantics of prepositions in important ways. Semantically, prepositions turn out to be quite similar to nouns and verbs. Nominal distinctions (like singular and plural, mass and count) and verbal classes (like semelfactives and degree achievements) have their prepositional counterparts.
|Keywords||Linguistics Philosophy of Language Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistics Semantics Syntax|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
George Lakoff (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Thing: What Catergories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
Stephen C. Levinson (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. MIT Press.
Ray S. Jackendoff (1983). Semantics And Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Barbara Landau & Ray Jackendoff (1993). “What” and “Where” in Spatial Language and Spatial Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):217.
Godehard Link (1998). Algebraic Semantics in Language and Philosophy. CSLI Publications.
Citations of this work BETA
Joost Zwarts (2013). From N to N: The Anatomy of a Construction. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (1):65-90.
Joost Zwarts & Peter Gärdenfors (2016). Locative and Directional Prepositions in Conceptual Spaces: The Role of Polar Convexity. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 25 (1):109-138.
Similar books and articles
Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk (2000). Representation of Formal Dispute with Astanding Order. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):205-231.
Alexander P. D. Mourelatos (1978). Events, Processes, and States. Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (3):415 - 434.
Janusz Czelakowski (1980). Reduced Products of Logical Matrices. Studia Logica 39 (1):19 - 43.
Manfred Krifka (1989). Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics. In Renate Bartsch, J. F. A. K. van Benthem & P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expression. Foris Publications 75--115.
Jörg R. J. Schirra (1993). A Contribution to Reference Semantics of Spatial Prepositions: The Visualization Problem and its Solution in Vitra. In Cornelia Zelinsky-Wibbelt (ed.), The Semantics of Prepositions -- From Mental Processing to Natural Language Processing. Mouton de Gruyter 471-515.
Joost Zwarts & Yoad Winter (2000). Vector Space Semantics: A Model-Theoretic Analysis of Locative Prepositions. [REVIEW] Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (2):169-211.
Nicholas Asher & Pierre Sablayrolles (1995). A Typology and Discourse Semantics for Motion Verbs and Spatial PPs in French. Journal of Semantics 12 (2):163-209.
J. Zwarts (1997). Vectors as Relative Positions: A Compositional Semantics of Modified PPs. Journal of Semantics 14 (1):57-86.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #94,394 of 1,789,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #317,270 of 1,789,835 )
How can I increase my downloads?