David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Semantics 14 (1):57-86 (1997)
The interpretation of modified PPs, like one meter behind the disk, far outside the village, or right under the lamp, has never received much attention in the literature about prepositions. However, as this paper shows, the modification of PPs presents an intriguing problem for a compositional semantics of PPs. This problem can be solved when the PP is interpreted, not as a set of points or mereological portions of space, but as a set of vectors, that represent positions relative to the reference object. Modifiers map a set of vectors to a subset For example, if behind the desk denotes the set of vectors pointing backward from the desk, then one meter behind the desk denotes the subset consisting of those vectors that have a length of one meter. Given the familiar operations on vectors, the denotations of PPs can be studied in a systematic way, by formulating formal properties that characterize empirically relevant subclasses of locative PPs or that provide general constraints on their denotation. The examples are taken from Dutch, but the conclusions are valid for all languages that have the kind of PP modification that exists in Dutch and English
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joost Zwarts (2005). Prepositional Aspect and the Algebra of Paths. Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (6):739 - 779.
Ora Matushansky (2008). On the Linguistic Complexity of Proper Names. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (5):573-627.
Wlodek Zadrozny (1994). From Compositional to Systematic Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (4):329 - 342.
Peter Pagin (forthcoming). Communication and the Complexity of Semantics. In W. Hinzen, E. Machery & Werning (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Compositionality.
Pietro Galliani & Allen L. Mann (2013). Lottery Semantics: A Compositional Semantics for Probabilistic First-Order Logic with Imperfect Information. Studia Logica 101 (2):293-322.
Stephen R. Schiffer (1991). Does Mentalese Have a Compositional Semantics? In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.
Nicholas Asher & Pierre Sablayrolles (1995). A Typology and Discourse Semantics for Motion Verbs and Spatial PPs in French. Journal of Semantics 12 (2):163-209.
Emmon Bach & Robin Cooper (1978). The NP-S Analysis of Relative Clauses and Compositional Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (1):145 - 150.
Maria Bittner (1995). Quantification in Eskimo: A Challenge for Compositional Semantics. In E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer & B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages. Kluwer. 59--80.
Anna Szabolcsi (2010). Quantification. Cambridge University Press.
Uli Sauerland & Penka Stateva (eds.) (2007). Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Marco Zorzi & Gabriella Vigliocco (1999). Compositional Semantics and the Lemma Dilemma. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):60-61.
Gennaro Chierchia & Danny Fox, The Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures and the Relationship Between Semantics and Pragmatics.
Paul M. Pietroski (2006). Interpreting Concatenation and Concatenates. Philosophical Issues 16 (1):221–245.
Dag Westerståhl (2004). On the Compositional Extension Problem. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (6):549-582.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads13 ( #100,596 of 1,089,053 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #30,944 of 1,089,053 )
How can I increase my downloads?