A Non-Test for Ambiguity

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):185 - 187 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent article in this journal, Roberts suggests a semantic method for distinguishing ambiguity and generality, a method which is intended to avoid the problems that others such as Zwicky and Sadock, Hintikka, and McCawley have found in making such a decision. Roberts claims that his test derives its validity from the observation that an ambiguous expression has a disjunction of meanings, whereas a general expression has but one meaning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
43 (#352,595)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Is 'Cause' Ambiguous?Phil Corkum - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179:2945-71.
Ambiguity and explanation.Jonathan L. Shaheen - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (8):839-866.
Intuitions and Ambiguity Tests.Lawrence D. Roberts - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):189 - 197.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ambiguity vs. Generality: Removal of a Logical Confusion.Lawrence Roberts - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):295 - 313.
Ambiguity vs. Generality.Lawrence Roberts - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):295-313.

Add more references