Intelligent‐Design Theory: An Argument for Biotic Laws

Zygon 39 (1):175-191 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A central thesis of intelligent‐design theorists is that physical and chemical laws and chance are insufficient to account for irreducibly complex biological structures and that intelligent design is necessary to account for such phenomena. This assertion, however, still implies a reductionist ontology. We need to recognize that reality displays multiple modes of being beyond simply chemical and physical modes of being, each of which is governed by laws for that mode of being. This essay argues for an alternate framework for understanding life phenomena that is neither philosophical materialism nor intelligent‐design theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
64 (#241,932)

6 months
5 (#510,007)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Emergent evolution? Klapwijk and Dooyeweerd.Henk G. Geertsema - 2011 - Philosophia Reformata 76 (1):50-76.
Whence the Question Mark?Russ Wolfinger - 2011 - Philosophia Reformata 76 (1):77-83.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection.Charles Darwin - 1897 - New York: Heritage Press. Edited by George W. Davidson.
Chance and necessity.Jacques Monod - 1971 - New York,: Vintage Books.
A New Critique of theoretical Thought.Herman Dooyeweerd - 1953 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 65 (3):357-360.

View all 16 references / Add more references