Search results for 'Lucas Jr' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Joseph Lucas & Charles W. Lucas Jr (2002). A Physical Model for Atoms and Nuclei—Part 1. Foundations of Science 5 (1):1-7.score: 150.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Billy Joe Lucas (2002). Logical Constructivism, Modal Logic, and Metaphysics: A Reply to Professor Pruss' ``Professor Lucas' Second Epistemic Way''. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):143-157.score: 120.0
  3. J. R. Lucas (1984). Lucas, Godel and Astaire: A Rejoinder. Philosophical Quarterly 34 (137):507-508.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Billy Joe Lucas (1997). The Second Epistemic Way Revisited: Reply to Professor Beard's, 'Professor Lucas on Omniscience'. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):143-162.score: 120.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. J. R. Lucas (1998). Transcendental Tense: J.R. Lucas. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):45–56.score: 120.0
  6. John R. Lucas (1984). Lucas Against Mechanism II: A Rejoinder. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (June):189-91.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Paul J. Schafer, Nicholas V. Costantino, Walter P. Krolikowski, Clyde E. Crum, R. Williams, Christopher J. Lucas, George M. Bellack, Val D. Rust, Miller Jr & Richard R. Renner (1975). Book Review Section 3. [REVIEW] Ethics and Behavior 6 (1):75-83.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. J. R. Lucas, The Huxley-Wilberforce Debate Revisited.score: 60.0
    According to the legend, Bishop Wilberforce (``Soapy Sam'') at a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Oxford on Saturday, June 30th, 1860, turned to Thomas Huxley, and asked him ``Is it on your grandfather's or your grandmother's side that you claim descent from a monkey''; whereupon Huxley delivered a devastating rebuke, thereby establishing the primacy of scientific truth over ecclesiastical obscurantism. Although the legend is historically untrue in almost every detail, its persistence suggests that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Brian Lucas (2013). Religious Confession Privilege and the Common Law [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 90 (1):113.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: Religious confession privilege and the common law, by Keith Thompson (Leiden: Matinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011), pp.395, E135.00.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Susan Martinelli-Fernandez (2005). George R. Lucas, Jr. & W. Rick Rubel's (Eds) Ethics and the Military Profession: The Moral Foundations of Leadership and Case Studies in Military Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Military Ethics 4 (3):214-219.score: 60.0
    (2005). George R. Lucas, Jr. & W. Rick Rubel's (Eds) Ethics and the Military Profession: The Moral Foundations of Leadership and Case Studies in Military Ethics. Journal of Military Ethics: Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 214-219. doi: 10.1080/15027570500197453.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. J. R. Lucas (2000). The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics: An Essay on the Philosophy of Mathematics. Routledge.score: 60.0
    The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics is a comprehensive study of the foundation of mathematics. Lucas, one of the most distinguished Oxford scholars, covers a vast amount of ground in the philosophy of mathematics, showing us that it is actually at the heart of the study of epistemology and metaphysics.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. J. R. Lucas (1997). Comments: Reality and Time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (1):97 – 108.score: 60.0
    (1997). Comments: Reality and time. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Vol. 11, Festschrift for J. R. Lucas, pp. 97-108. doi: 10.1080/02698599708573553.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. J. R. Lucas, I Have Recently Had an E-Mail From Mr Evin Harris of Trinity College Dublin:.score: 60.0
    Dear Mr. Lucas, I was wondering if you had come across Query 44 of George Berkeley's ``Analyst: A discourse addressed to an infidel mathematician"?. It reads: ``Whether the difference between a mere computer and a man of science be not that one computes on principles clearly conceived and by rules evidently demonstrated, whereas the other [i.e a man] doth not?" Not bad for 1734!
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Hello John Lucas, About Me.score: 60.0
    Hello Mr John Lucas, I go to school in Perth in Western Australia. In the subject mathematics at my school, we were given a project to research a given mathematician and write a report on them. I was given you. I have to incorporate some information about the mathematical times in which you live and to attempt to include details of the contribution that you made to the field of mathematics. I also have to include a short biography (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Brian Lucas (2012). The Episcopal Conference in the Communications Marketplace: Issues and Challenges for Catholic Identity and Ecclesiology. Australasian Catholic Record, The 89 (4):408.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian This article deals with the role of the Episcopal Conference in the area of social communications and the tensions that arise with respect to the respective roles of the diocesan bishop and the Episcopal Conference, including lay heads of ecclesial agencies, in presenting 'the face of the Church' in the public forum. The article is divided into two sections: i)The Church as 'visible institution' and the ecclesiological and juridical foundations for identifying those who represent it in the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Brian Lucas (2012). The Price of Freedom: Edmund Rice Educational Leader [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 89 (1):121.score: 60.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: The price of freedom: Edmund Rice educational leader, by Denis McLaughlin, East Kew: David Lovell Publishing, 2007, pp.397, $45.00.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. J. R. Lucas, The Open Society €“ and ..score: 60.0
    There was once a leak from Hebdomadal Council. The Assessor told her husband, who told my wife, who told me that Monday afternoon had been spent discussing what Lucas would say if various courses of action were adopted, leading to the conclusion that it would be best to do nothing. I was flattered, but a bit surprised. The tide of philosophical scepticism had ebbed, and it was generally allowed that a reasonable way of discovering what someone would say (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. J. R. Lucas (2003). Knowing the Unknowable God: How Faith Thrives on Divine Mystery. Waterbrook Press.score: 60.0
    Meet the God Who Is Greater Than Your Biggest Questions. The Bible never shies away from seeming contradictions. We are told both to resist our enemies and to love them, and that our all-knowing God can sometimes forget. Unable to reconcile such biblical paradoxes, some people abandon Christianity, while others pretend that the seeming contradictions don’t exist–preferring to believe in an uncomplicated, easy-to-comprehend God. Yet countless others are hungry for new insight into the God behind the Bible’s mysterious paradoxes. Responding (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. J. R. Lucas (1995). Responsibility. Clarendon Press.score: 60.0
    Responsibility is a key concept in our moral, social and political thinking, but is not itself properly understood. In this book J R Lucas elucidates it in terms of answerability - the obligation to answer the question 'Why did you do it?' He develops this account to include negative responsiblity - 'Why did you not do something about it?' - and share responsibility, which together yield the rationale of political responsibility. In disentangling these two strands of argument, he points (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Lewis S. Ford (1985). George R. Lucas, Jr., The Genesis of Modern Process Thought: A Historical Outline with Bibliography Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 5 (1):18-20.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Lewis S. Ford (1989). Hegel and Whitehead: Contemporary Perspectives on Systematic Philosophy. Edited by George R. Lucas, Jr. The Modern Schoolman 66 (2):158-159.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Brian Snowdon & Howard R. Vane (1998). Transforming Macroeconomics: An Interview with Robert E. Lucas Jr. Journal of Economic Methodology 5 (1):115-146.score: 45.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. J. R. Lucas (2011). Conceptual Roots of Mathematics. Routledge.score: 40.0
    The Conceptual Roots of Mathematics is a comprehensive study of the foundation of mathematics. J.R. Lucas, one of the most distinguished Oxford scholars, covers a vast amount of ground in the philosophy of mathematics, showing us that it is actually at the heart of the study of epistemology and metaphysics.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Brian Lucas (2011). Pope Benedict XVI and the Sexual Abuse Crisis - Working for Reform and Renewal [Book Review]. Australasian Catholic Record, The 88 (3):381.score: 40.0
    Lucas, Brian Review(s) of: Pope benedict XVI and the sexual abuse crisis - working for reform and renewal, Gregory Erlandson and Matthew Bunson, (Huntington, Indiana: Our Sunday Visitor Publishing Division, 2010), pb, pp.207.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. P. Helm (1994). JR Lucas. Responsibility. Journal of Applied Philosophy 11:242-242.score: 36.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Jan Narveson (1982). JR Lucas, On Justice Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 2 (1):27-29.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Sjoerd van Hoorn (2005). Basil Mitchell and JR Lucas, An Engagement with Plato's Republic Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 25 (1):53-54.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis (1999). Living with Your Biographical Subject: Special Problems of Distance, Privacy and Trust in the Biography of G. Ledyard Stebbins Jr. Journal of the History of Biology 32 (3):421 - 438.score: 18.0
    This paper explores the special problems encountered by the biographer of a living scientific subject. In particular, it explores the complex of problems that emerges from the intense interpersonal dynamic involving issues of distance, privacy and trust. It also explores methodological problems having to do with oral history interviews and other supporting documentation. It draws on the personal experience of the author and the biographical subject of G. Ledyard Stebbins Jr., the botanist, geneticist and evolutionist. It also offers prescriptives and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Ricardo Noguera-Solano & Rosaura Ruiz-gutiérrez (2009). Darwin and Inheritance: The Influence of Prosper Lucas. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 42 (4):685 - 714.score: 18.0
    An important historical relation that has hardly been addressed is the influence of Prosper Lucas's Treatise on Natural Inheritance on the development of Charles Darwin's concepts related to inheritance. In this article we trace this historical connection. Darwin read Lucas's Treatise in 1856. His reading coincided with many changes concerning his prior ideas on the transmission and expression of characters. We consider that this reading led him to propose a group of principles regarding prepotency, hereditary diseases, morbid tendencies (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Ildo Perondi, Fabrizio Zandonadi Catenassi & Gisele Soares Silva (2013). A centralidade da Palavra de Deus em Lucas 5,1-11 (The centrality of the Word od God in Luke 5,1-11) - DOI: 10.5752/P.2175-5841.2013v11n30p682. [REVIEW] Horizonte 11 (30):682-708.score: 18.0
    Pouca atenção foi dada pelos estudiosos para a função da Palavra de Deus no relato da pesca milagrosa em Lucas, tanto em nível literário, quanto teológico. Diante disso, o objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar a perícope de Lc 5,1-11, com enfoque na Palavra de Deus, proclamada em Jesus e por ele. A metodologia utilizada foi a análise e interpretação de textos, privilegiando o método histórico-crítico e os seus elementos essenciais, além do uso de outros métodos, baseados na ciência da (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. G. Lee Bowie (1982). Lucas' Number is Finally Up. Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (3):279-85.score: 15.0
  32. David L. Boyer (1983). R. Lucas, Kurt Godel, and Fred Astaire. Philosophical Quarterly 33 (April):147-59.score: 15.0
  33. Andrew D. Irvine (1983). Lucas, Lewis, and Mechanism -- One More Time. Analysis 43 (March):94-98.score: 15.0
  34. George R. Lucas Jr (1990). African Famine: New Economic and Ethical Perspectives. Journal of Philosophy 87 (11):629-641.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. C. Whitely (1962). Minds, Machines and Godel: A Reply to Mr Lucas. Philosophy 37 (January):61-62.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Lucas Jr (1986). Philosophy and Philosophy Of. Proceedings of the British Academy 72:247-267.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Steven M. Bayne (2004). Kant on Causation: On the Fivefold Routes to the Principle of Causation. State University of New York Press.score: 15.0
    A volume in the SUNY series in Philosophy George R. Lucas Jr., editor.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Lucas Jr, Language and Politics.score: 15.0
    The language of liberty has long been the despair of exact thinkers. The words "liberty" and "freedom" have been used in a multitude of senses, sometimes inconsistent, often confused, always emotive. But whereas many have thought to deal with similar inexactitude in the use of the word "democracy" by banning it altogether from the vocabulary of politics, few have dared to do so with "liberty" and "freedom". The words are too important and what they stand for is too precious for (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. George R. Lucas Jr (2010). Nerds Gone Wild. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):71-80.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jean Goodwin (2001). Henry Johnstone, Jr.'S Still-Unacknowledged Contributions to Contemporary Argumentation Theory. Informal Logic 21 (1).score: 15.0
    Given the pragmatic tum recently taken by argumentation studies, we owe renewed attention to Henry Johnstone's views on the primacy of process over product. In particular, Johnstone's decidedly non-cooperative model is a refreshing alternative to the current dialogic theories of arguing, one which opens the way for specifically rhetorical lines of inquiry.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. George R. Lucas Jr (2010). Postmodern War. Journal of Military Ethics 9 (4):289-298.score: 15.0
    This article, an introduction to a special issue of the Journal of Military Ethics devoted to emerging military technologies, elaborates the present status of certain predictions about the future of warfare and combat made by postmodern essayist, Umberto Eco, during the First Gulf War in 1991. The development of military robotics, innovations in nanotechnology, prospects for the biological, psychological, and neurological ?enhancement? of combatants themselves, combined with the increasing use of nonlethal weapons and the advent of cyber warfare, have operationalized (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. David L. Bergman & Charles W. Lucas Jr (2003). Credibility of Common Sense Science. Foundations of Science 6 (2):1-10.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. James Crosswhite (2001). Con Amore: Henry Johnstone, Jr.'S Philosophy of Argumentation. Informal Logic 21 (1).score: 15.0
    Henry Johnstone's philosophical development was guided by a persistent need to reform the concept of validity -either by reinterpreting it or by finding a substitute for it. This project lead Johnstone into interesting confrontations with the concept of rhetoric and especiaUy with the work of Chaim Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca. The project culminated in a failed attempt to develop a formal ethics of rhetoric and argumentation, but this attempt was itself not consistent with some of Johnstone's other characterizations ofan ethics of (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Mark Timmons & Robert Johnson (eds.) (forthcoming). Value, Reason, and Respect: Kantian Themes From the Philosophy of Thomas E. Hill, Jr. Oxford.score: 15.0
    The book features chapters by Bernard and Jan Boxill, Robin S. Dillon, Stephen Darwall, Mark Schroeder, Jonathan Dancy, Onora O’Neill, Gerald Gaus, Jeffrie G. Murphy, Matt Zwolinski and David Schmidtz, Cheshire Calhoun, Marcia Baron, Andrews Reath, and Julia Driver that take up themes and arguments in Tom Hill’s work in ethics, social, political and legal philosophy, as well as his work on Kant’s ethics. The volume concludes with an essay by Tom Hill in which he reflects on how he came (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Charles W. Lucas Jr (2004). A Classical Electromagnetic Theory of Elementary Particles–Part 1, Introduction. Foundations of Science 7 (4):1-8.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Charles W. Lucas Jr (2001). A New Foundation for Modern Physics. Foundations of Science 4 (4):1-8.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Charles W. Lucas Jr (forthcoming). A Physical Model for Atoms and Nuclei—Part 4. Foundations of Science.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. George R. Lucas Jr (1998). Charles Hartshorne. The Personalist Forum 14 (2):83-108.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Charles W. Lucas Jr (2010). Confirmation of New Solar System Force Supports Universal Electrodynamic Force. Foundations of Science 13 (4):1-9.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Charles W. Lucas Jr (forthcoming). Creationists Should Not Accept Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Science.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000