Search results for 'Miller Jr' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. George A. Miller & Gilbert Harman (eds.) (1993). Conceptions of the Human Mind: Essays in Honor of George A. Miller. L. Erlbaum Associates.score: 150.0
    This volume is a direct result of a conference held at Princeton University to honor George A. Miller, an extraordinary psychologist. A distinguished panel of speakers from various disciplines -- psychology, philosophy, neuroscience and artificial intelligence -- were challenged to respond to Dr. Miller's query: "What has happened to cognition? In other words, what has the past 30 years contributed to our understanding of the mind? Do we really know anything that wasn't already clear to William James?" Each (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Christian Miller (2005). Review of Alexander Miller, An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83:279-281.score: 150.0
    My initial hope when I first saw Miller’s book was that here at least would be a work which satisfies the long standing need for a comprehensive introduction to contemporary metaethics which is accessible enough to be employed in advanced undergraduate courses and introductory graduate seminars. This hope was only partially realized, however, as Miller ends up oscillating between clear presentations of extant debates in the recent literature and his own extended attempts to determine where the truth of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Charles Weijer & Paul B. Miller (2007). Refuting the Net Risks Test: A Response to Wendler and Miller's "Assessing Research Risks Systematically". Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):487-490.score: 150.0
    Earlier in the pages of this journal (p 481), Wendler and Miller offered the "net risks test" as an alternative approach to the ethical analysis of benefits and harms in research. They have been vocal critics of the dominant view of benefit-harm analysis in research ethics, which encompasses core concepts of duty of care, clinical equipoise and component analysis. They had been challenged to come up with a viable alternative to component analysis which meets five criteria. The alternative must (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Franklin G. Miller, John P. Gluck Jr & David Wendler (2008). Debriefing and Accountability in Deceptive Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):235-251.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Steven Joffe & Franklin G. Miller (2008). Steven Joffe and Franklin G. Miller Reply. Hastings Center Report 38 (5):7-7.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Michael Brown, Owen R. Cote Jr, Sean M. Lynn-Jones, Steven E. Miller & Eric Caplan (2000). Amy Allen, The Power of Feminist Theory: Domination, Resistance, Solidarity. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1999, 150 Pp.(Indexed). ISBN 0-8133-9072-9, $49.00 (Hb). Richard B. Brandt, A Theory of the Good and the Right. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1998, 362 Pp.(Indexed). ISBN 1-57392-220-X, $18.95. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 34:135-138.score: 120.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Paul Litton & Franklin G. Miller (2005). Paul Litton and Franklin G. Miller Reply to Madeline M. Motta. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (4):635-635.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. James Longrigg, Mario Biagioli, N. Wise, Crosbie Smith, M. Micale, Ralph Colp Jr, William Clark, K. Cleaver & David P. Miller (forthcoming). Hiftory of Science. History of Science.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Richard W. Miller, George R. Lucas Jr, Jeff McMahan, Darrel Moellendorf, Enabling Monsters, Fernando R. Tesón, Ending War, David Rodin, Global Democratization & John S. Dryzek (2011). Carnegie Council. Ethics and International Affairs 25.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. F. G. Miller & H. Brody (2003). Clinical Equipoise and the Therapeutic Misconception-Miller and Brody Reply. Hastings Center Report 33 (5):7-7.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Franklin Miller & Robert Truog (2009). Franklin Miller and Robert Truog Reply. Hastings Center Report 39 (3):6-6.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gregory A. Miller, Daniel N. Levin, Michael J. Kozak, Edwin W. Cook Iii, Alvin McLean Jr & Peter J. Lang (1987). Individual Differences in Imagery and the Psychophysiology of Emotion. Cognition and Emotion 1 (4):367-390.score: 120.0
  13. Alexander Miller (2003). LANGUAGE* Alexander Miller. In John Shand (ed.), Fundamentals of Philosophy. Routledge. 262.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. C. Miller (2005). Miller, Alexander, An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):279.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. M. Miller (2001). Phase I Cancer Trials: Therapeutic Research?-Matthew Miller Replies. Hastings Center Report 31 (1):5-5.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. N. Miller, G. Valdés Gutiérrez & R. Salazar (2007). Reseña de "Paradigmas emancipatorios y movimientos sociales en América Latina teoría y praxis" de Gilberto Nchamah Miller y Robinson Salazar (coords.). Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 12 (36):129-131.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Nchamah Miller & Gilberto Valdés Gutiérrez (2007). Reseña de “paradigmas emancipatorios Y movimientos sociales en américa latina teoría Y praxis” de Gilberto nchamah Miller Y Robinson Salazar (coords.) Utopía Y praxis latinoamericana, enero-marzo, año/vol. 12, número 036 universidad Del zulia. [REVIEW] Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 12 (36):125-131.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Peter Miller (1998). Richard M. Miller, Casuistry and Modern Ethics: A Poetics of Practical Reasoning Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 18 (2):132-134.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Steven Miller (1992). Steven Miller. Social Epistemology 6 (1):23-33.score: 120.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Fred D. Miller, Jr & John Ahrens (1988). The Social Responsibility of Corporations. In Tibor R. Machan (ed.), Commerce and Morality. Rowman & Littlefield.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jeffrey Paul & Fred D. Miller Jr (1990). Communitarian and Liberal Theories of the Good. Review of Metaphysics 43 (4):803 - 830.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Cameron R. Peterson, Z. J. Ulehla, Alan J. Miller, Lyle E. Bourne Jr & Donald W. Stilson (1965). Internal Consistency of Subjective Probabilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (5):526.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Norbert Anwander (2012). Moral Obligation. Edited by Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul. (Cambridge UP, 2010. Pp. Xv + 345. Price £ 36.99.). [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):410-413.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Andrew Fagan (2007). Autonomy – Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller Jr and Jeffrey Paul. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):311–313.score: 45.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. David Mcnaughton (1999). E. F. Paul, F. D. Miller Jr and J. Paul (Eds.), Cultural Pluralism and Moral Knowledge, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994, Pp. 301. [REVIEW] Utilitas 11 (02):251-.score: 45.0
  26. Trevor J. Saunders (1997). Book Review:Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle's "Politics." Fred D. Miller, Jr. [REVIEW] Ethics 108 (1):216-.score: 45.0
  27. Donald Gustafson (1974). George W. Miller, Jr. 1934-1974. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48:177 - 178.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Andrew Levine (2001). Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul, Eds., Problems of Market Liberalism:Problems of Market Liberalism. [REVIEW] Ethics 111 (2):435-438.score: 45.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. D. Archard (forthcoming). Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr. And Jeffrey Paul, Eds, Cultural Pluralism and Moral Knowledge. Radical Philosophy.score: 45.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Andrew Cunningham (1996). Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller Jr., and Jeffrey Paul Eds., The Just Society Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 16 (4):280-282.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Kenneth Ft Cust (1995). Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul, Eds., Property Rights Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 15 (3):195-197.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. W. Davie (1995). Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., Jeffrey Paul (Eds.). Cultural Pluralism and Moral Knowledge. Journal of Applied Philosophy 12:303-303.score: 45.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Stephen John (2004). Titanic Ethics, Pirate Ethics, Bioethics: Bioethics Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr., & Jeffrey Paul (Eds.); Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York & Melbourne, 2002, Pp. Xvii+ 396, Price£ 15.95 Paperback, ISBN 0-521-52526-8. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (1):177-184.score: 45.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Eric Mack (1985). Ellen Frankel Paul, Jeffrey Paul, and Fred D. Miller, Jr., Eds., Human Rights Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 5 (9):379-382.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Brian M. O'Connell (1997). Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr. And Jeffrey Paul, Eds., Scientific Innovation, Philosophy, and Public Policy Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 17 (4):273-274.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. P. Simpson (1996). Fred D. Miller, Jr., Nature, Justice and Rights in Aristotle's" Politics". Journal of the History of Philosophy 34:607-607.score: 45.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Political Thought (2009). Fred D. Miller, Jr. In Stephen G. Salkever (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Political Thought. Cambridge University Press. 301.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. L. Munk (1998). Shingwauk's Vision: A History of Native Residential Schools. By JR Miller. The European Legacy 3:149-149.score: 36.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. David B. Wilson (1974). Nineteenth Century Aether Theories by Kenneth F. Schaffner; The Ethereal Aether: A History of the Michelson-Morley-Miller Aether Experiments, 1800-1930 by Loyd S. Swenson, Jr. [REVIEW] History of Science 12:220-227.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (2009). Responsible Nations: Miller on National Responsibility. Ethics and Global Politics 2 (2).score: 18.0
    In National Responsibility and Global Justice, David Miller defends the view that a member of a nation can be collectively responsible for an outcome despite the fact that: (i) she did not control it; (ii) she actively opposed those of her nation’s policies that produced the outcome; and (iii) actively opposing the relevant policy was costly for her. I argue that Miller’s arguments in favor of this strong externalist view about responsibility and control are insufficient. Specifically, I show (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Nils Holtug (2011). The Cosmopolitan Strikes Back: A Critical Discussion of Miller on Nationality and Global Equality. Ethics and Global Politics 4 (3).score: 18.0
    According to David Miller, we have stronger obligations towards our co-nationals than we have towards non-nationals. While a principle of equality governs our obligations of justice within the nation-state, our obligations towards non-nationals are governed by a weaker principle of sufficiency. In this paper, I critically assess Miller’s objection to a traditional argument for global egalitarianism, according to which nationalist and other deviations from equality rely on factors that are arbitrary from a moral point of view. Then I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Rowan Cruft (2010). Kamm and Miller on Rights' Compatibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):393 - 401.score: 18.0
    In their recent books, National Responsibility and Global Justice (2007) and Intricate Ethics (2007), David Miller and Frances Kamm give two similar arguments aimed at preventing their favoured accounts of the moral justification of rights from justifying an excess of demanding assistance rights. Both arguments appeal to the fact that a proliferation of assistance rights would conflict with other rights. In this paper, I show that these arguments fail. As Miller recognises in a footnote, the failure of such (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis (1999). Living with Your Biographical Subject: Special Problems of Distance, Privacy and Trust in the Biography of G. Ledyard Stebbins Jr. Journal of the History of Biology 32 (3):421 - 438.score: 18.0
    This paper explores the special problems encountered by the biographer of a living scientific subject. In particular, it explores the complex of problems that emerges from the intense interpersonal dynamic involving issues of distance, privacy and trust. It also explores methodological problems having to do with oral history interviews and other supporting documentation. It draws on the personal experience of the author and the biographical subject of G. Ledyard Stebbins Jr., the botanist, geneticist and evolutionist. It also offers prescriptives and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Kim Angell (2013). Do Insecure Property Rights Ground Rights of Jurisdiction? Miller on Territorial Justice. Res Publica 19 (2):183-192.score: 18.0
    A prominent approach in the debate on territorial rights claims that a group may have jurisdictional rights over a particular land if that land has become a repository of value for the group. This justification relies on a premise which has remained largely unsubstantiated, namely that having jurisdictional rights should be our preferred means for ensuring the group’s retaining of the land’s embedded value. This article discusses a recent attempt to fill this gap. David Miller acknowledges that the value (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Kieran Oberman (2013). Beyond Sectarianism? On David Miller's Theory of Human Rights. Res Publica 19 (3):275-283.score: 18.0
    In his most recent book, National Responsibility and Global Justice, David Miller presents an account of human rights grounded on the idea of basic human needs. Miller argues that his account can overcome what he regards as a central problem for human rights theory: the need to provide a ‘non-sectarian’ justification for human rights, one that does not rely on reasons that people from non-liberal societies should find objectionable. The list of human rights that Miller’s account generates (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Otmar Spinas & Sonja Thiele (2010). Additivity of the Two-Dimensional Miller Ideal. Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (6):617-658.score: 18.0
    Let ${{\mathcal J}\,(\mathbb M^2)}$ denote the σ-ideal associated with two-dimensional Miller forcing. We show that it is relatively consistent with ZFC that the additivity of ${{\mathcal J}\,(\mathbb M^2)}$ is bigger than the covering number of the ideal of the meager subsets of ω ω. We also show that Martin’s Axiom implies that the additivity of ${{\mathcal J}\,(\mathbb M^2)}$ is 2 ω .Finally we prove that there are no analytic infinite maximal antichains in any finite product of ${\mathfrak{P}{(\omega)}/{\rm fin}}$.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Edward Feser (2005). There is No Such Thing as an Unjust Initial Acquisition. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):56-80.score: 15.0
    Critics of Robert Nozick's libertarian political theory often allege that the theory in general and its account of property rights in particular lack sufficient foundations. A key difficulty is thought to lie in his account of how portions of the world which no one yet owns can justly come to be initially acquired. But the difficulty is illusory, because (contrary to what both Nozick and his critics assume) the concept of justice does not meaningfully apply to initial acquisition in the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Denis McManus (2000). Boghossian, Miller and Lewis on Dispositional Theories of Meaning. Mind and Language 15 (4):393-399.score: 15.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Fred D. Miller Jr (1973). Did Aristotle Have the Concept of Identity? Philosophical Review 82 (4):483-490.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Fred D. Miller Jr (1996). Aristotle and the Origins of Natural Rights. Review of Metaphysics 49 (4):873-907.score: 15.0
1 — 50 / 1000