Search results for 'Standpoint Theory' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  79
    Kristoffer Ahlstrom (2005). Incorporating Feminist Standpoint Theory. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):79-92.
    As has been noted by Alvin Goldman, there are some very interesting similarities between his Veritistic Social Epistemology (VSE) and Sandra Harding's Feminist Standpoint Theory (FST). In the present paper, it is argued that these similarities are so significant as to motivate an incorporation of FST into VSE, considering that (i) a substantial common ground can be found; (ii) the claims that go beyond this common ground are logically compatible; and (iii) the generality of VSE not only does (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  30
    Sharon Crasnow (2009). Is Standpoint Theory a Resource for Feminist Epistemology? An Introduction. Hypatia 24 (4):189 - 192.
    Introduction to cluster of papers on feminist standpoint theory.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Sandra G. Harding (ed.) (2004). The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Routledge.
    In the mid-1970s and early 1980s, several feminist theorists began developing alternatives to the traditional methods of scientific research. The result was a new theory, now recognized as Standpoint Theory, which caused heated debate and radically altered the way research is conducted. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader is the first anthology to collect the most important essays on the subject as well as more recent works that bring the topic up-to-date. Leading feminist scholar and one (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   24 citations  
  4.  27
    Alison Wylie & Sergio Sismondo (2015). Standpoint Theory, in Science. In James D. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier 324-330.
    Standpoint theory is based on the insight that those who are marginalized or oppressed have distinctive epistemic resources with which to understand social structures. Inasmuch as these structures shape our understanding of the natural and lifeworlds, standpoint theorists extend this principle to a range of biological and physical as well as social sciences. Standpoint theory has been articulated as a social epistemology and as an aligned methodological stance. It provides the rationale for ‘starting research from (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Kristen Intemann (2010). Years of Feminist Empiricism and Standpoint Theory: Where Are We Now? Hypatia 25 (4):778-796.
    Over the past twenty-five years, numerous articles in Hypatia have clarified, revised, and defended increasingly more nuanced views of both feminist empiricism and standpoint feminism. Feminist empiricists have argued that scientific knowledge is contextual and socially situated (Longino 1990; Nelson 1990; Anderson 1995), and standpoint feminists have begun to endorse virtues of theory choice that have been traditionally empiricist (Wylie 2003). In fact, it is unclear whether substantive differences remain. I demonstrate that current versions of feminist empiricism (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  6. Sandra G. Harding (2004). A Socially Relevant Philosophy of Science? Resources From Standpoint Theory's Controversiality. Hypatia 19 (1):25-47.
    : Feminist standpoint theory remains highly controversial: it is widely advocated, used to guide research and justify its results, and yet is also vigorously denounced. This essay argues that three such sites of controversy reveal the value of engaging with standpoint theory as a way of reflecting on and debating some of the most anxiety-producing issues in contemporary Western intellectual and political life. Engaging with standpoint theory enables a socially relevant philosophy of science.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  7. Sandra Harding (2004). Introduction: Standpoint Theory as a Site of Political, Philosophic, and Scientific Debate. In Sandra G. Harding (ed.), The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Routledge 1--15.
  8.  6
    Chevan Lindsay, Feminist Perspectivism: A Revised Standpoint Theory.
    The heart of this thesis is an examination into the relevant differences between Nietzsche’s perspectivism and standpoint theory. Briefly, both standpoint theory and perspectivism have been subjected to various charges that dissolve into two major ones, which are worthy of additional scrutiny: the charges of essentialism and incoherence. My overall argument in thesis is that standpoint theory, in spite of recent feminist defense, is still susceptible to these charges, and this proves counterproductive to its (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  8
    Kristoffer Ahlström (2005). Incorporating Feminist Standpoint Theory. SATS 6 (2).
    As has been noted by Alvin Goldman, there are some very interesting similarities between his Veritistic Social Epistemology (VSE) and Sandra Harding's Feminist Standpoint Theory (FST). In the present paper, it is argued that these similarities are so significant as to motivate an incorporation of FST into VSE, considering that (i) a substantial common ground can be found; (ii) the claims that go beyond this common ground are logically compatible; and (Hi) the generality of VSE not only does (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Catherine Hundleby (2001). Feminist Standpoint Theory as a Form of Naturalist Epistemology. Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
    In this dissertation I argue that naturalist epistemology would benefit if it were recognized to include feminist standpoint theory, a theory of knowledge that is based on the feminist critiques of science. Naturalists such as W. O. Quine argue that normative epistemology can be developed on the basis of science. However, they have mostly rested content with descriptions of how knowledge seems to work. Naturalists need to evaluate our epistemic practices against competing alternatives if they are to (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  47
    Nadine Changfoot (2004). Feminist Standpoint Theory, Hegel and the Dialectical Self: Shifting the Foundations. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (4):477-502.
    The claim that theoretical foundations are historically contingent does not draw the same intensity of fire as it did one or especially two decades ago. The aftermath of debates on the political boundaries created by foundations allows for a deeper exploration of the foundations of feminist theory. This article re-examines the (anti)-Hegelian foundations of the feminist standpoint put forward by Nancy Hartsock and argues that the Hegelian subject of the early Phenomenology of Spirit resists gender codification in its (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  7
    Kathy Rudy (1999). Revisiting Standpoint Theory. Theory and Event 3 (3).
  13.  32
    Margret Grebowicz (2007). Standpoint Theory and the Possibility of Justice: A Lyotardian Critique of the Democratization of Knowledge. Hypatia 22 (4):16-29.
    : Grebowicz argues from the perspective of Jean-François Lyotard's critique of deliberative democracy that the project of democratizing knowledge may bring us closer to terror than to justice. The successful formulation of a critical standpoint requires that we figure the political as itself a contested site, and incorporate this into our theorizing about the role of dissent in the production of knowledges. This essay contrasts Lyotard's notion of the differend with Chantal Mouffe's agonistic model.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  16
    Alessandra Tanesini, Standpoint Theory Then and Now.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  19
    Kristina Rolin (2009). Standpoint Theory as a Methodology for the Study of Power Relations. Hypatia 24 (4):218 - 226.
  16.  58
    Janet A. Kourany (2009). The Place of Standpoint Theory in Feminist Science Studies. Hypatia 24 (4):209 - 218.
  17.  4
    Sandra Harding (2004). A Socially Relevant Philosophy of Science? Resources From Standpoint Theory's Controversiality. Hypatia 19 (1):25-47.
  18.  2
    Iddo Landau (2008). Problems with Feminist Standpoint Theory in Science Education. Science and Education 17 (10):1081-1088.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  5
    Cassandra L. Pinnick (2008). Science Education for Women: Situated Cognition, Feminist Standpoint Theory, and the Status of Women in Science. Science and Education 17 (10):1055-1063.
  20.  8
    Daniel W. Conway (1997). Circulus Vitiosus Deus? The Dialectical Logic of Feminist Standpoint Theory. Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (1):62-76.
  21. T. Bowell (2011). Feminist Standpoint Theory. In James Fieser & Bradley Dowden (eds.), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  22. W. Scott Cameron (2005). The Genesis and Justification of Feminist Standpoint Theory in Hegel and Lukács. Dialogue and Universalism 15 (3):19-41.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Margret Grebowicz (2007). Standpoint Theory and the Possibility of Justice: A Lyotardian Critique of the Democratization of Knowledge. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 22 (4):16-29.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Margret Grebowicz (2007). Standpoint Theory and the Possibility of Justice: A Lyotardian Critique of the Democratization of Knowledge. Hypatia 22 (4):16-29.
  25. Alison Wylie (2015). Standpoint Theory. In Robert Audi (ed.), Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press 1021-1022.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  30
    Quentin Smith (1978). Scheler's Critique of Husserl's Theory of the World of the Natural Standpoint. Modern Schoolman 55 (4):387-396.
    Scheler's critique of Husserl's theory of the world of the natural standpoint may be understood as a decisive factor in the transition of phenomenological philosophy from the "rationalism" of Husserl to the 'existentialism" of Heidegger. Husserl's theory that the value characteristics of the world are founded on the natural characteristics signifies, as we will show, that the individual objects of the world are "logical individuals." By criticizing this view, and by showing that it is really the value (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  8
    Steve Buckler (1997). Machiavelli and Rousseau: The Standpoint of the City and the Authorial Voice in Political Authorial Voice in Political Theory. History of the Human Sciences 10 (3):69-86.
    A systematic comparison is made between the respective political theories of Machiavelli and Rousseau. Initially, the comparison centres upon key substantive claims made by each theorist with a view to estab lishing a general, thematic contrast. This is used as a basis for structur ing a further comparison between the respective authorial standpoints adopted by Machiavelli and Rousseau. It will be suggested that this comparison establishes, (a) that a connection can be made between sub stantive theory and authorial (...) and, (b) that, in comparison, the authorial standpoint adopted by Machiavelli reflects a fidelity to the political which is absent in Rousseau. (shrink)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Alison Wylie (2003). Why Standpoint Matters. In Robert Figueroa & Sandra G. Harding (eds.), Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology. Routledge 26--48.
    Feminist standpoint theory has been marginal to mainstream philosophical analyses of science–indeed, it has been marginal to science studies generally–and it has had an uneasy reception among feminist theorists. Critics of standpoint theory have attributed to it untenable foundationalist assumptions about the social identities that can underpin an epistemically salient standpoint, and implausible claims about the epistemic privilege that should be accorded to those who occupy subdominant social locations. I disentangle what I take to be (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  29. Alison Wylie (2012). Feminist Philosophy of Science: Standpoint Matters. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophy Association 86 (2):47-76.
    Standpoint theory is an explicitly political as well as social epistemology. Its central insight is that epistemic advantage may accrue to those who are oppressed by structures of domination and discounted as knowers. Feminist standpoint theorists hold that gender is one dimension of social differentiation that can make such a difference. In response to two longstanding objections I argue that epistemically consequential standpoints need not be conceptualized in essentialist terms, and that they do not confer automatic or (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Joseph A. Sergeant (2005). The Dynamic Developmental Theory of ADHD: Reflections From a Cognitive Energetic Model Standpoint. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):442-443.
    “A dynamic developmental theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) predominantly hyperactive/impulsive and combined subtypes” is a major contribution linking comparative psychology with clinical developmental neuropsychopathology. In this commentary, I place some critical remarks concerning the theory's explanation of sleep problems, inhibition, error monitoring, and motor control.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Sharon Crasnow (2008). Feminist Philosophy of Science: 'Standpoint' and Knowledge. [REVIEW] Science and Education 17 (10):1089-1110.
    Feminist philosophy of science has been criticized on several counts. On the one hand, it is claimed that it results in relativism of the worst sort since the political commitment to feminism is prima facie incompatible with scientific objectivity. On the other hand, when critics acknowledge that there may be some value in work that feminists have done, they comment that there is nothing particularly feminist about their accounts. I argue that both criticisms can be addressed through a better understanding (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32.  10
    Nancy S. Jecker (2008). The Role of Standpoint in Justice Theory. Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (2):165-182.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  33.  76
    Ernst Cassirer (1922). Einstein's Theory of Relativity Considered From the Epistemological Standpoint. The Monist 32 (3):89-134.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34. Nancy Jecker (2008). The Role of Standpoint in Justice Theory. Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (2):269-269.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35. Deron Boyles (2009). Considering Lorraine Code's Ecological Thinking and Standpoint Epistemology: A Theory of Knowledge for Agentic Knowing in Schools. Ohio Valley Philosophy of Education Society, Philosophical Studies in Education 40:126 - 137.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  26
    Carl W. Helstrom (1974). “Simultaneous Measurement” From the Standpoint of Quantum Estimation Theory. Foundations of Physics 4 (4):453-463.
    The purpose of the simultaneous measurement of noncommuting quantum observables can be viewed as the joint estimation of parameters of the density operator of the quantum system. Joint estimation involves the application of a multiply parameterized operator-valued measure. An example related to the simultaneous estimation of the position and velocity of a particle is given. Conceptual difficulties attending simultaneous measurement of noncommuting observables are avoided by this formation.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  10
    Donald J. Cunningham (1999). Cultural Historical Activity Theory From a Semiotic Standpoint. Semiotics:71-77.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  1
    N. T. Gridgeman (1985). Review: Theodore Hailperin, Boole's Logic and Probability. A Critical Exposition From the Standpoint of Contemporary Algebra, Logic and Probability Theory. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (3):851-852.
  39. N. T. Gridgeman & Theodore Hailperin (1988). Boole's Logic and Probability. A Critical Exposition From the Standpoint of Contemporary Algebra, Logic and Probability Theory. Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4):1253.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. N. T. Gridgeman (1985). Hailperin Theodore. Boole's Logic and Probability. A Critial Exposition From the Standpoint of Contemporary Algebra, Logic and Probability Theory. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 85. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York, and Oxford, 1976, X + 245 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (3):851-852.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. N. T. Gridgeman (1988). Hailperin Theodore. Boole's Logic and Probability. A Critical Exposition From the Standpoint of Contemporary Algebra, Logic and Probability Theory. Second Revised and Enlarged Edition of L 851. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 85. North-Holland, Amsterdam, New York, Etc., 1986, Xii + 428 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4):1253-1254.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  1
    Theodore Hailperin (1976). Boole's Logic and Probability a Critical Exposition From the Standpoint of Contemporary Algebra, Logic, and Probability Theory. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. G. Nordstrom (2007). Source Text 1913: On the Theory of Gravitation From the Standpoint of the Principle of Relativity. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 250 (3).
  44.  26
    Ágnes Kovács (2012). Gender in the Substance of Chemistry, Part 2: An Agenda for Theory. Hyle 18 (2):121 - 143.
    Feminist science criticism has mostly focused on the theories of the life sciences, while the few studies about gender and the physical sciences locate gender in the practice, and not in the theories, of these fields. Arguably, the reason for this asymmetry is that the conceptual and methodological tools developed by (feminist) science studies are not suited to analyze the hard sciences for gender-related values in their content. My central claim is that a conceptual, rather than an empirical, analysis is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Sharon Crasnow (2013). Feminist Philosophy of Science: Values and Objectivity. Philosophy Compass 8 (4):413-423.
    Feminist philosophy of science appears to present problems for the ideal of value-free science. These difficulties also challenge a traditional understanding of the objectivity of science. However, feminist philosophers of science have good reasons for desiring to retain some concept of objectivity. The present essay considers several recent and influential feminist approaches to the role of social and political values in science, with particular focus on feminist empiricism and feminist standpoint theory. The similarities and difference, as well as (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  46.  59
    Alison Wylie (2015). A Plurality of Pluralisms: Collaborative Practice in Archaeology. In Jonathan Y. Tsou, Alan Richardson & Flavia Padovani (eds.), Objectivity in Science. Springer International Publishing 189-210.
    Innovative modes of collaboration between archaeologists and Indigenous communities are taking shape in a great many contexts, in the process transforming conventional research practice. While critics object that these partnerships cannot but compromise the objectivity of archaeological science, many of the archaeologists involved argue that their research is substantially enriched by them. I counter objections raised by internal critics and crystalized in philosophical terms by Boghossian, disentangling several different kinds of pluralism evident in these projects and offering an analysis of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  85
    Alison Wylie, Kelly Koide, Marisol Marini & Marian Toledo (2014). Archaeology and Critical Feminism of Science: Interview with Alison Wylie. Scientiae Studia 12 (3):549-590.
    In this wide-ranging interview with three members of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Sao Paolo (Brazil) Wylie explains how she came to work on philosophical issues raised in and by archaeology, describes the contextualist challenges to ‘received view’ models of confirmation and explanation in archaeology that inform her work on the status of evidence and contextual ideals of objectivity, and discusses the role of non-cognitive values in science. She also is pressed to explain what’s feminist about feminist (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Shari Stone-Mediatore (2007). Challenging Academic Norms: An Epistemology for Feminist and Multicultural Classrooms. National Women's Studies Association Journal 19 (2):55-78.
    Even while progressive educators and feminist standpoint theorists defend the value of marginalized perspectives, many marginal-voice texts continue to be deprecated in academic contexts due to their seemingly "unprofessional," engaged, and creative styles. Thus, scholars who seek to defend a feminist and multicultural curriculum need a theory of knowledge that goes beyond current standpoint theory and accounts for the unorthodox format in which many maringal standpoints appear. In response to this challenge, this essay draws on feminist (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Christine James (1998). Hegel, Harding, and Objectivity. Southwest Philosophy Review 14 (1):111-122.
    Jean Hyppolite describes Hegel’s project in the Phenomenology of Spirit as “the development and formulation of natural consciousness and its progression to science, that is to say, to philosophic knowledge, to knowledge of the absolute” (Hyppolite 1974, 4). This development or progression is the “work of consciousness engaged in experience,” as phenomenal knowledge necessarily leads to absolute knowledge. Thus from the very nature of consciousness one is led toward the absolute, which is both substance as well as subject. This paper (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  74
    Shari Stone-Mediatore (2003). Reading Across Borders: Storytelling and Knowledges of Resistance. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Bringing together the work of Hannah Arendt, poststructuralist and hermeneutic theories of narrative, and feminist standpoint theory, this book examines the role of narrative in both ideological and critical political thinking. The book recasts feminist affirmations (and critiques) of "marginal experience" by situating experience and identity within a theory of narrative and it identifies the specific narrative strategies that impede, and those that facilitate, feminist and democratic struggles.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000