Search results for 'Themistius' (try it on Scholar)

48 found
Sort by:
  1. Myrna Gabbe (2010). Themistius on Concept Acquisition and Knowledge of Essences. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (3):215-235.score: 18.0
    Themistius's (ca. 317–ca. 388 C.E.) paraphrase of the De Anima is an influential and important work; however, it is not now regarded as profound or original and thereby suffers from neglect. I argue that Themistius is misunderstood on the matter of Aristotle's productive and potential intellects. It is commonly held that Themistius gives to the productive intellect the role of illuminating images in order to produce universal thoughts in the potential intellect with epistemic certainty. I argue that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ahmad Hasnawi (2007). Boèce, Averroès Et Abū Al-Barakāt Al-Baġādī, Témoins Des Écrits de Thémistius Sur Les Topiques D'Aristote. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 17 (2):203-265.score: 18.0
    Aristotle Middle Commentary on the Topics, comparing them, where necessary, to the testimonies collected by Boethius in his De topicis differentiis. In addition we show that the Themistian classification of loci was taken up by Abt al-Badb al-mub al-mu al-Barak thus reveals himself to be closer than Averroes to the testimony of Boethius. This suggests the idea of a double redaction by Themistius of the classification of loci: one, more concentrated, comes from an introduction to the paraphrase of the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Guy Guldentops (2001). Themistius on Evil. Phronesis 46 (2):189-208.score: 18.0
    Although Themistius does not develop a theodicy, his observations on evil are fairly consistent. Both in his paraphrases of Aristotle and in his speeches, he argues that since God is the intelligent and powerful cause of all good things in the universe, evil is due to the στέρησις in matter and to the ἄνοιι of human beings. Despite some (Neo-)Platonic and Stoic influences, Themistius defends a basically Peripatetic world-view, in which evil is minimized.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Lorelle Lamascus (2006). Aquinas and Themistius on Intellect. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:255-273.score: 18.0
    Aquinas puts forward two different, and conflicting, interpretations of Themistius’s account of the intellect. In his earlier interpretation of Themistius, Aquinas understands him to hold the position that both the possible and agent intellect are separate and incorruptible, existing apart from individual human souls but shared in by individual souls in the process of knowing. In De unitate intellectus contra averroistas, however, Aquinas radically departs from this reading, hailing Themistius as a genuine interpreter of the Peripatetic position, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Sophia Vasalou (2007). Boethius, Averroes, and Abu Al-Barakat Al-Bagdadı, Witnesses to Themistius's Works on Aristotle's Topics Ahmad Hasnawi Aristotle's Topics, and Especially, as Far as the Subject of This Study is Concerned, Their Central Books (II-VII), Played a Role of Central Importance. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 17:199-202.score: 15.0
  6. Vernon J. Bourke (1959). Themistius. New Scholasticism 33 (1):112-114.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. M. J. Boyd (1937). H. F. Bouchery: Themistius in Libanius' Brieven. Critische uitgave van 52 brieven, voorzien van een historisch commentaar en tekstverklarende nota's. Met een voorrede van J. Bidez. Pp. 295. Antwerp: 'De Sikkel', 1936. Paper, 24s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (06):240-.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Renford Bambrough (1961). Hubert Kesters: Plaidoyer d'Un Socratique Contre le Phèdre de Platon: Xxvie Discours de Thémistius. Introduction, Texte Et Traduction. Pp. Xvi + 296. Louvain: Nauwelaerts, 1959. Paper, 290 B. Fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 11 (02):163-164.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Devin Henry (2003). Themistius and Spontaneous Generation in Aristotle's Metaphysics. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24:183-208.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Mary Whitby (2002). Themistius' Private Speeches R. J. Penella: The Private Orations of Themistius . Pp. XIII + 258. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 2000. Cased, £35. Isbn: 0-520-21821-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 52 (01):13-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. D. Woods (2004). The Constantinian Origin of Justina (Themistius, Or. 3.43b). Classical Quarterly 54 (1):325-327.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Martin Achard (2008). Themistius' Paraphrase of Posterior Analytics 71a17-B8. Laval Théologique et Philosophique 64 (1):19.score: 15.0
  13. Elisa Coda (2011). Themistius, Arabic. In. In H. Lagerlund (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer. 1260--1266.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Myrna Gabbe (2008). Themistius as a Commentator on Aristotle: Understanding and Appreciating His Conception of Nous Pathetikos and Phantasia. Dionysius 26:73-92.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Robert Goulding (2000). Who Wrote the Twelfth Oration of Themistius? Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 63:1-23.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John Finamore (2011). Colloquium 1: Themistius on Soul and Intellect in Aristotle's De Anima. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 26 (1):1-23.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. John F. Finamore (2010). Themistius' Doctrine of the Three Intellects. Dionysius 28.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. R. Hackforth (1935). Ecce Iterum Antisthenes H. Kesters: Antisthène de la Dialectique: étude critique et exégétique sur le XXVI' discours de Thémistius. Pp. 236. Louvain: Bibliothèque de l'Université, 1935. Paper, 50 francs. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (06):223-224.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. H. Sidebottom (1999). Themistius J. Vanderspoel: Themistius and the Imperial Court: Oratory, Civic Duty, and Paideia From Constantius to Theodosius . Pp. Xii + 280. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995. ISBN: 0-472-10485-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (01):37-.score: 15.0
  20. Carlos Steel (1973). Des Commentaires d'Aristote Par Themistius ? Revue Philosophique De Louvain 71 (12):669-680.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Gérard Verbeke (1955). Thémistius Et le « De Unitate Intellectus » de Saint Thomas. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 53 (38):141-164.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Orner Ballériaux (1994). Thémistius Et le Néoplatonisme. Le Υoυ Παθητιó Et l'Immortalité de L'Âme. Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 12 (2):171-200.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. T. Brauch (2001). Patristic and Byzantine Witness to an Urban Prefectship of Themistius Under Valens. Byzantion 71 (2):325-382.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Thomas Brauch (1993). Themistius and the Emperor Julian. Byzantion 63:79-115.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Th Brauch (1993). The Prefect of Constantinople for 362 AD: Themistius. Byzantion 63:37-78.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Stanislas Cantin (1956). THÉMISTIUS. — Commentaire Sur le Traité de l'Âme d'Aristote. Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke. Édition Critique Et Étude Sur l'Utilisation du Commentaire Dans l'Oeuvre de Saint Thomas, Par G. Verbeke. Xcviii — 322 P., Broché. Coll. Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum. Édit. Béatrice-Nauwelærts, 10, Rue de l'Abbaye, Paris (VI), 1957. Prix : 450 Fr.B. [REVIEW] Laval Théologique et Philosophique 12 (2):251.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. L. J. Daly (1975). Themistius' Concept of Philanthropia'. Byzantion 45:22-40.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. L. J. Daly (1983). Themistius' Refusal of a Magistracy'. Byzantion 53:164-212.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. J. Fenno (2005). Setting Aright the House of Themistius in Pindar's" Nemean" 5 and" Isthmian" 6. Hermes 133 (3).score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Guy Guldentops (2001). Thème - SOURCES ET FONDEMENTS DU NÉOPLATONISME - La science suprême selon Thémistius. Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 19 (1):99.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Dimitri Gutas (1999). Averroes on Theophrastus, Through Themistius. In. In Gerhard Endress, Jan Aertsen & Klaus Braun (eds.), Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition: Sources, Constitution, and Reception of the Philosophy of Ibn Rushd (1126-1198): Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Averroicum, Cologne, 1996. Brill. 31--125.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Stuart B. Martin (1966). The Nature of the Human Intellect as It is Expounded in Themistius' "Paraphrasis in Libros Aristotelis de Anima". In Frederick J. Adelmann (ed.), The Quest for the Absolute. Boston College. 1--21.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. J. Reginald O'Donnell (1958). Themistius' Paraphrasis of the Posterior Analytics in Gerard of Cremona's Translation. Mediaeval Studies 20 (1):239-315.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Anne Sheppard (1994). Two Aristotelian Commentators on the Intellect: The de Intellectu Attributed to Alexander of Aphrodisias and Themistius' Paraphrase of Aristotle de Anima 3.4-. [REVIEW] Ancient Philosophy 14 (2):434-435.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Paul Shorey (1896). Note on Themistius' Paraphrase of Physics, Ii. 9. The Classical Review 10 (07):328-.score: 15.0
  36. Vladimir Valdenberg (1924). Discours politiques de Thémistius dans leur rapport avec l 'antiquité‖. Byzantion 1:557-580.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Lieve Van Hoof & Peter Van Nuffelen (2011). Pseudo-Themistius, Pros Basilea: A False Attribution. Byzantion 81:412-423.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Riccardo Strobino (2012). Avicenna’s Use of the Arabic Translations of the Posterior Analytics and the Ancient Commentary Tradition. Oriens 40 (2):355–389.score: 3.0
    In this paper I shall discuss the relationship between the two known Arabic translations of Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Burhān. I shall argue that Avicenna relies on both (1) Abū Bishr Mattā’s translation and (2) the anonymous translation used by Averroes in the Long Commentary as well as in the Middle Commentary (and also indirectly preserved by Gerard of Cremona’s Latin translation of Aristotle’s work). Although, generally speaking, the problem is relevant to the history of the transmission of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Mauro Nasti De Vincentis (2004). From Aristotle's Syllogistic to Stoic Conditionals: Holzwege or Detectable Paths? Topoi 23 (1):113-137.score: 3.0
    This paper is chiefly aimed at individuating some deep, but as yet almost unnoticed, similarities between Aristotle's syllogistic and the Stoic doctrine of conditionals, notably between Aristotle's metasyllogistic equimodality condition (as stated at APr. I 24, 41b27–31) and truth-conditions for third type (Chrysippean) conditionals (as they can be inferred from, say, S.E. P. II 111 and 189). In fact, as is shown in §1, Aristotle's condition amounts to introducing in his (propositional) metasyllogistic a non-truthfunctional implicational arrow '', the truth-conditions of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Michael W. Hickson (2010). The Message of Bayle's Last Title: Providence and Toleration in the Entretiens de Maxime Et de Thémiste. Journal of the History of Ideas 71 (4):547-567.score: 3.0
    In this paper I uncover the identities of the interlocutors of Pierre Bayle's Entretiens de Maxime et de Themiste, and I show the significance of these identities for a proper understanding of the Entretiens and of Bayle's thought more generally. Maxime and Themiste represent the philosophers of late antiquity, Maximus of Tyre and Themistius. Bayle brought these philosophers into dialogue in order to suggest that the problem of evil, though insoluble by means of speculative reason, could be dissolved and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Jon McGinnis (2006). Positioning Heaven: The Infidelity of a Faithful Aristotelian. Phronesis 51 (2):140-161.score: 3.0
    Aristotle's account of place in terms of an innermost limit of a containing body was to generate serious discussion and controvery among Aristotle's later commentators, especially when it was applied to the cosmos as a whole. The problem was that since there is nothing outside of the cosmos that could contain it, the cosmos apparently could not have a place according to Aristotle's definition; however, if the cosmos does not have a place, then it is not clear that it could (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Raymond Martin, Review. [REVIEW]score: 3.0
    In this extraordinarily rich and provocative book by an eminent intellectual historian and philosopher, Richard Sorabji argues persuasively that there was “an intense preoccupation” among ancient western thinkers with self and related notions. In the process, he provides fresh translations and often novel interpretations of the most important passages relevant to this contention in a host of thinkers, including Homer, Epicharmus, Heraclitus, Plato, Aristotle, Epicurus, Chrysippus, Cicero, Lucretius, Seneca, Plutarch, Epictetus, Hierocles, Marcus Aurelius, Tertullian, Origen, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Plotinus, Porphyry, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Daniele Cozzoli (2007). Alessandro Piccolomini and the Certitude of Mathematics. History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (2):151-171.score: 3.0
    This paper offers a reconstruction of Alessandro Piccolomini's philosophy of mathematics, and reconstructs the role of Themistius and Averroes in the Renaissance debate on Aristotle's theory of proof. It also describes the interpretative context within which Piccolomini was working in order to show that he was not an isolated figure, but rather that he was fully involved in the debate on mathematics and physics of Italian Aristotelians of his time. The ideas of Lodovico Boccadiferro and Sperone Speroni will be (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Gilbert Dagron, Themistius, H. Schenkl, G. Downey & A. F. Norman (1973). Orationes quae supersunt Vol. II. Journal of Hellenic Studies 93:237.score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Themistius (1962). Eis Ton Autou Patera. Göttingen.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Themistius (1996). On Aristotle's on the Soul. Cornell University Press.score: 3.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation