Search results for 'basic law v' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Sean Walsh (2012). Comparing Peano Arithmetic, Basic Law V, and Hume's Principle. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1679-1709.score: 540.0
    This paper presents new constructions of models of Hume's Principle and Basic Law V with restricted amounts of comprehension. The techniques used in these constructions are drawn from hyperarithmetic theory and the model theory of fields, and formalizing these techniques within various subsystems of second-order Peano arithmetic allows one to put upper and lower bounds on the interpretability strength of these theories and hence to compare these theories to the canonical subsystems of second-order arithmetic. The main results of this (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Manuel Bremer, Frege's Basic Law V and Cantor's Theorem.score: 540.0
    The following essay reconsiders the ontological and logical issues around Frege’s Basic Law (V). If focuses less on Russell’s Paradox, as most treatments of Frege’s Grundgesetze der Arithmetik (GGA)1 do, but rather on the relation between Frege’s Basic Law (V) and Cantor’s Theorem (CT). So for the most part the inconsistency of Naïve Comprehension (in the context of standard Second Order Logic) will not concern us, but rather the ontological issues central to the conflict between (BLV) and (CT). (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Charles Sayward (2002). Convention T and Basic Law V. Analysis 62 (4):289–292.score: 540.0
    It is argued that Convention T and Basic Law V of Frege’s Grungesetze share three striking similarities. First, they are universal generalizations that are intuitively plausible because they have so many obvious instances. Second, both are false because they yield contradictions. Third, neither gives rise to a paradox.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Liu Jingxian (2012). Second-Order Positive Comprehension and Frege's Basic Law V. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 7 (3):367-377.score: 450.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Richard Heck (2005). Julius Caesar and Basic Law V. Dialectica 59 (2):161–178.score: 360.0
    This paper dates from about 1994: I rediscovered it on my hard drive in the spring of 2002. It represents an early attempt to explore the connections between the Julius Caesar problem and Frege's attitude towards Basic Law V. Most of the issues discussed here are ones treated rather differently in my more recent papers "The Julius Caesar Objection" and "Grundgesetze der Arithmetik I 10". But the treatment here is more accessible, in many ways, providing more context and a (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Nathaniel Law (2006). Abortion: Supreme Court Avoids Disturbing Abortion Precedents by Ruling on Grounds of Remedy-Ayotte V. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England. Journal of Law, Medicine Ethics 34 (2):469-471.score: 300.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Adam Rieger (2002). Paradox Without Basic Law V: A Problem with Frege’s Ontology. Analysis 62 (276):327–330.score: 270.0
  8. Francesca Boccuni (2010). Plural grundgesetze. Studia Logica 96 (2):315-330.score: 270.0
    PG ( Plural Grundgesetze ) is a predicative monadic second-order system which exploits the notion of plural quantification and a few Fregean devices, among which a formulation of the infamous Basic Law V. It is shown that second-order Peano arithmetic can be derived in PG. I also investigate the philosophical issue of predicativism connected to PG. In particular, as predicativism about concepts seems rather un-Fregean, I analyse whether there is a way to make predicativism compatible with Frege’s logicism.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Michael Dummett (1994). Chairman's Address: Basic Law V. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94:243--251.score: 270.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. George Boolos & Peter Clark (1993). Basic Law (V). Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 67:213 - 249.score: 270.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Boccuni (2011). On the Consistency of a Plural Theory of Frege’s Grundgesetze. Studia Logica 97 (3):329-345.score: 270.0
    PG (Plural Grundgesetze) is a predicative monadic second-order system which is aimed to derive second-order Peano arithmetic. It exploits the notion of plural quantification and a few Fregean devices, among which the infamous Basic Law V. In this paper, a model-theoretical consistency proof for the system PG is provided.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jan Harald Alnes (1999). Sense and Basic Law V in Frege's Logicism. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 4:1-30.score: 270.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. George Boolos (1993). Whence the Contradiction? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 67:211--233.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Anandi V. Law & Karen Shapiro (2005). Impact of a Community Pharmacist‐Directed Clinic in Improving Screening and Awareness of Osteoporosis. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (3):247-255.score: 160.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Mark Bounthavong & Anandi V. Law (2008). Identifying Health‐Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains for Multiple Chronic Conditions (Diabetes, Hypertension and Dyslipidemia): Patient and Provider Perspectives. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (6):1002-1011.score: 160.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. G. Hasenjaeger (1997). Furth Montgomery. Editor's Introduction. The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, Exposition of the System, by Frege Gottlob, Translated and Edited by Furth Montgomery, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles 1964, Pp. V–Lvii. Frege G.. Introduction. English Translation of Pp. V–Xxvi of 4910. The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, Exposition of the System, by Frege Gottlob, Translated and Edited by Furth Montgomery, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles 1964, Pp. 1-25. Frege Gottlob ... [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (4):671-672.score: 135.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Emily Grabham (2002). Law V Canada: New Directions for Equality Under the Canadian Charter? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (4):641-661.score: 112.0
    The equality provision in section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1982 was drafted with a vision of promoting substantive equality. Following challenges to this vision during the 1990s by a group of conservative Supreme Court judges, the recent judgment of Iacobucci J in Law v Canada (1999) has been welcomed for reasserting section 15's substantive ideal. But despite the effective manner in which the provision was drafted, and despite the recent guidelines set out in Law, interpretations (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Anita Allen, Natural Law, Slavery, and the Right to Privacy Tort.score: 108.0
    In 1905 the Supreme Court of Georgia became the first state high court to recognize a freestanding “right to privacy” tort in the common law. The landmark case was Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Co. Must it be a cause for deep jurisprudential concern that the common law right to privacy in wide currency today originated in Pavesich’s explicit judicial interpretation of the requirements of natural law? Must it be an additional worry that the court which originated the common (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Adrienne Barnett (2000). Getting a `Get' – the Limits of Law's Authority? N. V. N. (Jurisdiction: Pre-Nuptial Agreement) [1999] 2 F.L.R. 745. [REVIEW] Feminist Legal Studies 8 (2):241-254.score: 108.0
    This note examines the decision of the Family Division of the High Court in N. v. N. (Jurisdiction: Pre-Nuptial Agreement) in which, in the context of Jewish divorce proceedings, the Court found that it had no jurisdiction to order a husband, by specific performance of a marriage agreement, to go through the procedure to obtain a ‘get’ (a hand-written bill of divorcement) allowing his wife to remarry. First, discussion of the case is contextualised broadly within the debate on the (de)merits (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Edmund Wall (2008). Natural Law and Basic Goods. Philo 11 (1):50-77.score: 96.0
    There would appear to be enormous philosophical differences between some influential exponents in contemporary natural law ethics. It would appear that there are deep and irresolvable philosophical differences between Ralph McInerny, on the one side, and Germain Grisez, Joseph Boyle, and John Finnis, on the other, with regard to both the contents of the basic goods of natural law, and as to whether there is an objective hierarchy among the basic goods themselves. The second of these apparently unbridgeable (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Wojciech Włoch (2013). Epistemological–Normative Function of the Basic Norm in Hans Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law. Dialogue and Universalism 23 (2):25-42.score: 96.0
    The objective of the article is to present Hans Kelsen’s basic norm concept that allows the combination of the two relevant dimensions in relation to juridical science, namely the positivity and validity of law. The role of the concept of basic norm is presented by the author of the Reine Rechtslehre with reference to Kant (read through the works by H. Cohen) as a concept enabling formulation of an answer to the question “To what extent is it possible (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Øystein Linnebo (2003). Frege's Conception of Logic: From Kant to Grundgesetze. Manuscrito 26 (2):235-252.score: 90.0
    I shall make two main claims. My first main claim is that Frege started out with a view of logic that is closer to Kant’s than is generally recognized, but that he gradually came to reject this Kantian view, or at least totally to transform it. My second main claim concerns Frege’s reasons for distancing himself from the Kantian conception of logic. It is natural to speculate that this change in Frege’s view of logic may have been spurred by a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Bob Hale & Crispin Wright, Focus Restored Comment on John MacFarlane's “Double Vision: Two Questions About the Neo-Fregean Programme”.score: 90.0
    Anything worth regarding as logicism about number theory holds that its fundamental laws – in effect, the Dedekind-Peano axioms – may be known on the basis of logic and definitions alone. For Frege, the logic in question was that of the Begriffschrift – effectively, full impredicative second order logic - together with the resources for dealing with the putatively “logical objects” provided by Basic Law V of Grundgesetze. With this machinery in place, and with the course-of-values operator governed by (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Edward N. Zalta, Frege's Logic, Theorem, and Foundations for Arithmetic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 90.0
    In this entry, Frege's logic is introduced and described in some detail. It is shown how the Dedekind-Peano axioms for number theory can be derived from a consistent fragment of Frege's logic, with Hume's Principle replacing Basic Law V.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Kevin C. Klement (2001). Russell's Paradox in Appendix B of the Principles of Mathematics : Was Frege's Response Adequate? History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (1):13-28.score: 90.0
    In their correspondence in 1902 and 1903, after discussing the Russell paradox, Russell and Frege discussed the paradox of propositions considered informally in Appendix B of Russell’s Principles of Mathematics. It seems that the proposition, p, stating the logical product of the class w, namely, the class of all propositions stating the logical product of a class they are not in, is in w if and only if it is not. Frege believed that this paradox was avoided within his philosophy (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Jeffrey Ketland (2002). Hume = Small Hume. Analysis 62 (1):92–93.score: 90.0
    We can modify Hume’s Principle in the same manner that George Boolos suggested for modifying Frege’s Basic Law V. This leads to the principle Small Hume. Then, we can show that Small Hume is interderivable with Hume’s Principle.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Stewart Shapiro (2003). Prolegomenon to Any Future Neo-Logicist Set Theory: Abstraction and Indefinite Extensibility. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):59--91.score: 90.0
    The purpose of this paper is to assess the prospects for a neo-logicist development of set theory based on a restriction of Frege's Basic Law V, which we call (RV): PQ[Ext(P) = Ext(Q) [(BAD(P) & BAD(Q)) x(Px Qx)]] BAD is taken as a primitive property of properties. We explore the features it must have for (RV) to sanction the various strong axioms of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. The primary interpretation is where ‘BAD’ is Dummett's ‘indefinitely extensible’. 1 Background: what and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Francesca Boccuni (2013). Plural Logicism. Erkenntnis 78 (5):1051-1067.score: 90.0
    PG (Plural Grundgesetze) is a consistent second-order system which is aimed to derive second-order Peano arithmetic. It employs the notion of plural quantification and a few Fregean devices, among which the infamous Basic Law V. George Boolos’ plural semantics is replaced with Enrico Martino’s Acts of Choice Semantics (ACS), which is developed from the notion of arbitrary reference in mathematical reasoning. Also, substitutional quantification is exploited to interpret quantification into predicate position. ACS provides a form of logicism which is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Fernando Ferreira & Kai F. Wehmeier (2002). On the Consistency of the Δ11-CA Fragment of Frege's Grundgesetze. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):301-311.score: 90.0
    It is well known that Frege's system in the Grundgesetze der Arithmetik is formally inconsistent. Frege's instantiation rule for the second-order universal quantifier makes his system, except for minor differences, full (i.e., with unrestricted comprehension) second-order logic, augmented by an abstraction operator that abides to Frege's basic law V. A few years ago, Richard Heck proved the consistency of the fragment of Frege's theory obtained by restricting the comprehension schema to predicative formulae. He further conjectured that the more encompassing (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Bob Hale (2000). Abstraction and Set Theory. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):379--398.score: 90.0
    The neo-Fregean program in the philosophy of mathematics seeks a foundation for a substantial part of mathematics in abstraction principles—for example, Hume’s Principle: The number of Fs D the number of Gs iff the Fs and Gs correspond one-one—which can be regarded as implicitly definitional of fundamental mathematical concepts—for example, cardinal number. This paper considers what kind of abstraction principle might serve as the basis for a neo- Fregean set theory. Following a brief review of the main difficulties confronting the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. G. Landini (2006). The Ins and Outs of Frege's Way Out. Philosophia Mathematica 14 (1):1-25.score: 90.0
    Confronted with Russell's Paradox, Frege wrote an appendix to volume II of his Grundgesetze der Arithmetik. In it he offered a revision to Basic Law V, and proclaimed with confidence that the major theorems for arithmetic are recoverable. This paper shows that Frege's revised system has been seriously undermined by interpretations that transcribe his system into a predicate logic that is inattentive to important details of his concept-script. By examining the revised system as a concept-script, we see how Frege (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Aditi Bhatia & Vijay K. Bhatia (2011). Discursive Illusions in Legislative Discourse: A Socio-Pragmatic Study. [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 24 (1):1-19.score: 90.0
    This paper takes the position that interpretations of legal discourse are invariably taken in the context of socio-pragmatic realities to which a particular instance of discourse applies. What makes this process even more complicated is the fact that social realities themselves are often negotiated within the mould of one’s subjective conceptualisations of reality. Institutions and organisations, including people in power, often represent socio-political realities from an ideologically fuelled perspective, engendering many ‘illusory’ categories often a result of contested versions of reality. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Richard Heck (1995). Frege's Principle. In J. Hintikka (ed.), From Dedekind to Gödel: Essays on the Development of the Foundations of Mathematics. Kluwer.score: 90.0
    This paper explores the relationship between Hume's Prinicple and Basic Law V, investigating the question whether we really do need to suppose that, already in Die Grundlagen, Frege intended that HP should be justified by its derivation from Law V.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Bill McKelvey & John Bragin (eds.) (2012). Complexity: Critical Concepts. Routledge.score: 87.0
    v. 1. Origins of order-creation science : complexity science from basic disciplines -- v. 2. Self-organization, emergence and self-organized criticality -- v. 3. Organization and management complexity dynamics -- v. 4. Agent-based socio-economic simulation -- v. 5. Power-law distributions in society and business.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Alessandro Spena (forthcoming). Iniuria Migrandi: Criminalization of Immigrants and the Basic Principles of the Criminal Law. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-23.score: 84.0
    In this paper I am specifically concerned with a normative assessment, from the perspective of a principled criminal law theory, of norms criminalizing illegal immigration. The overarching question I will dwell on is one specifically regarding the way of using criminal law which is implied in the enactment of such kinds of norms. My thesis will essentially be that it constitutes a veritable abuse of criminal law. In two senses at least: first, in the sense that by criminalizing illegal immigration (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Rudolf Neidert (1971). Legalized Right of Resistance. A Public Law Analysis of Art. 20, Para 4 of the Basic Law. Philosophy and History 4 (1):83-84.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. John Austin (1906/1983). The Austinian Theory of Law: Being an Edition of Lectures I, V, and Vi of Austin's "Jurisprudence," and of Austin's "Essay on the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence" with Critical Notes and Excursus. F.B. Rothman.score: 84.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. José Brunner (2008). Liberal Laws V. The Law of Large Numbers, or How Demographic Rhetoric Arouses Anxiety (in Germany). Law and Ethics of Human Rights 2 (1):54-87.score: 82.0
    This paper presents the metaphysics of liberal rights reasoning on one hand and that of demographic reasoning on the other, as exemplifying two worldviews that both compete and complement each other in the contemporary German public debate on demographic decline. First, this essay outlines the way in which liberal theorists of various outlooks, perfectionist and neutralist alike, assume that a wide range of rights serves not only the interests of those individuals who possess them, but that it constitutes the foundations (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. A. John Simmons (1999). Justification and Legitimacy. Ethics 109 (4):739-771.score: 81.0
    In this essay I will discuss the relationship between two of the most basic ideas in political and legal philosophy: the justification of the state and state legitimacy. I plainly cannot aspire here to a complete account of these matters; but I <span class='Hi'>hope</span> to be able to say enough to motivate a way of thinking about the relation between these notions that is, I believe, superior to the approach which seems to be dominant in contemporary political philosophy. Today (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Greg Bamford (1989). Popper, Refutation and 'Avoidance' of Refutation. Dissertation, The University of Queenslandscore: 81.0
    Popper's account of refutation is the linchpin of his famous view that the method of science is the method of conjecture and refutation. This thesis critically examines his account of refutation, and in particular the practice he deprecates as avoiding a refutation. I try to explain how he comes to hold the views that he does about these matters; how he seeks to make them plausible; how he has influenced others to accept his mistakes, and how some of the ideas (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Judith W. Decew (1987). Defending the “Private” in Constitutional Privacy. Journal of Value Inquiry 21 (3):171-184.score: 81.0
    Suppose we agree to reject the view that privacy has narrow scope and consequently is irrelevant to the constitutional privacy cases. We then have (at least) these two options: (1) We might further emphasize and draw out similarities between tort and constitutional privacy claims in order to develop a notion of privacy fundamental to informational and Fourth Amendment privacy concerns as well as the constitutional cases. We can cite examples indicating this is a promising position. Consider consenting homosexuality conducted in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. F. P. Schadler & J. E. Karns (1990). The Unethical Exploitation of Shareholders in Management Buyout Transactions. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (7):595 - 602.score: 81.0
    The accurate pricing of securities in the capital markets depends upon the markets being both efficient and fair. In management buyout transactions (MBOs), the price bid by inside managers enhances the efficient pricing of securities but raises a reasonable doubt about the fairness to existing shareholders. This study addresses this fairness question in MBOs and offers short-term and long-term legal alternatives which allow both the efficiency and fairness criteria to be met. In the short-term the case law established in the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. W. V. Quine (2004). Quintessence: Basic Readings From the Philosophy of W.V. Quine. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.score: 78.0
    Quintessence for the first time collects Quine's classic essays (such as "Two Dogmas" and "On What There Is") in one volume—and thus offers readers a much ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Joan E. Bertin & Mary S. Henifin (1994). Science, Law, and the Search for Truth in the Courtroom: Lessons From Daubert V. Merrell Dow. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 22 (1):6-20.score: 78.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. K. Abrams (2002). Extraordinary Measures: Protesting Rule of Law Violations After Bush V. Gore. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 21 (2):165-195.score: 78.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. James Chalmers (2013). Lucia Zedner and Julian V. Roberts: Principles and Values in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Andrew Ashworth. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-7.score: 78.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. David Ray Papke (2004). Book Review: Mark V. Tushnet, Slave Law in the American South: State V. Mann in History and Literature. University Press of Kansas, 2003, ISBN: 0-7006-1270-X (Cloth), 0-7006-1271-8 (Paper). [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de s�Miotique Juridique 17 (4):441-445.score: 78.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Joanne Conaghan (1996). Equity Rushes in Where Tort Law Fears to Tread: The Court of Appeal Decision in Burris V. Azadani. [REVIEW] Feminist Legal Studies 4 (2):221-228.score: 78.0
    In the present state of the law, there is no tort of harassment. Nor in the light of later authority can the view be upheld that there is no tort of harassment.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Anne Morris (2003). Embodying the Law:Coker and Osamor V. The Lord Chancellorand the Lord Chancellor's Department [2002]I.R.L.R. 80 (Court of Appeal). [REVIEW] Feminist Legal Studies 11 (1):45-55.score: 78.0
    In Britiain, it is unlawful,regardless of the motive of the discriminator,to refuse to give a woman a job because of hersex. On the other hand, the U.K. case ofCoker and Osamor v. The Lord Chancellor and theLord Chancellor's Department suggests that itis permissible, by `pre-selecting' anindividual man, to rule out any possible femalecandidates. The singular facts of this caseshould not disguise the troubling conclusionthat while sex (and race) discrimination maysometimes be blatant and deliberate, morefrequently it is subtle and routine. Furthermore, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. V. D. Perevalov (2001). Nauchnye Issledovaniia V Iuridicheskom Vuze (SIuI—UrGIuA, 1931—2001 Gg.)[Scientific Research in a University of Law. Sverdlovsk Institute of Law—Ural State Law Academy] Pravovedenie. [REVIEW] Jurisprudence 1:14.score: 78.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000