Search results for 'basic law v' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Sean Walsh (2012). Comparing Peano Arithmetic, Basic Law V, and Hume's Principle. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1679-1709.
    This paper presents new constructions of models of Hume's Principle and Basic Law V with restricted amounts of comprehension. The techniques used in these constructions are drawn from hyperarithmetic theory and the model theory of fields, and formalizing these techniques within various subsystems of second-order Peano arithmetic allows one to put upper and lower bounds on the interpretability strength of these theories and hence to compare these theories to the canonical subsystems of second-order arithmetic. The main results of this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  2. Manuel Bremer, Frege's Basic Law V and Cantor's Theorem.
    The following essay reconsiders the ontological and logical issues around Frege’s Basic Law (V). If focuses less on Russell’s Paradox, as most treatments of Frege’s Grundgesetze der Arithmetik (GGA)1 do, but rather on the relation between Frege’s Basic Law (V) and Cantor’s Theorem (CT). So for the most part the inconsistency of Naïve Comprehension (in the context of standard Second Order Logic) will not concern us, but rather the ontological issues central to the conflict between (BLV) and (CT). (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  90
    Charles Sayward (2002). Convention T and Basic Law V. Analysis 62 (4):289–292.
    It is argued that Convention T and Basic Law V of Frege’s Grungesetze share three striking similarities. First, they are universal generalizations that are intuitively plausible because they have so many obvious instances. Second, both are false because they yield contradictions. Third, neither gives rise to a paradox.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  7
    Liu Jingxian (2012). Second-Order Positive Comprehension and Frege's Basic Law V. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 7 (3):367-377.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Richard Heck (2005). Julius Caesar and Basic Law V. Dialectica 59 (2):161–178.
    This paper dates from about 1994: I rediscovered it on my hard drive in the spring of 2002. It represents an early attempt to explore the connections between the Julius Caesar problem and Frege's attitude towards Basic Law V. Most of the issues discussed here are ones treated rather differently in my more recent papers "The Julius Caesar Objection" and "Grundgesetze der Arithmetik I 10". But the treatment here is more accessible, in many ways, providing more context and a (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  13
    Philip A. Ebert (2016). Frege on Sense Identity, Basic Law V, and Analysis. Philosophia Mathematica 24 (1):9-29.
    The paper challenges a widely held interpretation of Frege's conception of logic on which the constituent clauses of basic law V have the same sense. I argue against this interpretation by first carefully looking at the development of Frege's thoughts in Grundlagen with respect to the status of abstraction principles. In doing so, I put forth a new interpretation of Grundlagen §64 and Frege's idea of ‘recarving of content’. I then argue that there is strong evidence in Grundgesetze that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Adam Rieger (2002). Paradox Without Basic Law V: A Problem with Frege’s Ontology. Analysis 62 (276):327–330.
  8.  5
    A. Rieger (2002). Paradox Without Basic Law V: A Problem with Frege's Ontology. Analysis 62 (4):327-330.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  4
    C. Sayward (2002). Convention T and Basic Law V. Analysis 62 (4):289-292.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  9
    Jan Harald Alnes (1999). Sense and Basic Law V in Frege's Logicism. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 4:1-30.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11.  15
    George Boolos & Peter Clark (1993). Basic Law (V). Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 67 (1):213 - 249.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  13
    Michael Dummett (1994). Chairman's Address: Basic Law V. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94:243--251.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13. Michael Dummett (1994). Discussions: Chairman's Address: Basic Law V. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94 (1):243-252.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Danielle Macbeth (2005). 5. Courses of Values and Basic Law V. In Frege's Logic. Harvard University Press 156-177.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. A. Rieger, Paradox Without Basic Law V: A Problem with Frege's Ontology.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  6
    Nathaniel Law (2006). Abortion: Supreme Court Avoids Disturbing Abortion Precedents by Ruling on Grounds of Remedy-Ayotte V. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34 (2):469-471.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Nathaniel Law (2006). Abortion: Supreme Court Avoids Disturbing Abortion Precedents by Ruling on Grounds of Remedy-Ayotte V. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England1. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):469-471.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  39
    Francesca Boccuni (2010). Plural grundgesetze. Studia Logica 96 (2):315-330.
    PG ( Plural Grundgesetze ) is a predicative monadic second-order system which exploits the notion of plural quantification and a few Fregean devices, among which a formulation of the infamous Basic Law V. It is shown that second-order Peano arithmetic can be derived in PG. I also investigate the philosophical issue of predicativism connected to PG. In particular, as predicativism about concepts seems rather un-Fregean, I analyse whether there is a way to make predicativism compatible with Frege’s logicism.
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19.  14
    Francesca Boccuni (2011). On the Consistency of a Plural Theory of Frege’s Grundgesetze. Studia Logica 97 (3):329-345.
    PG (Plural Grundgesetze) is a predicative monadic second-order system which is aimed to derive second-order Peano arithmetic. It exploits the notion of plural quantification and a few Fregean devices, among which the infamous Basic Law V. In this paper, a model-theoretical consistency proof for the system PG is provided.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  2
    Francesca Boccuni (2010). Plural Grundgesetze. Studia Logica 96 (2):315-330.
    PG (Plural Grundgesetze) is a predicative monadic second-order system which exploits the notion of plural quantification and a few Fregean devices, among which a formulation of the infamous Basic Law V. It is shown that second-order Peano arithmetic can be derived in PG. I also investigate the philosophical issue of predicativism connected to PG. In particular, as predicativism about concepts seems rather un-Fregean, I analyse whether there is a way to make predicativism compatible with Frege’s logicism.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. George Boolos (1993). Whence the Contradiction? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 67:211--233.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  22.  1
    Emily Grabham (2002). Law V Canada: New Directions for Equality Under the Canadian Charter? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (4):641-661.
    The equality provision in section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1982 was drafted with a vision of promoting substantive equality. Following challenges to this vision during the 1990s by a group of conservative Supreme Court judges, the recent judgment of Iacobucci J in Law v Canada (1999) has been welcomed for reasserting section 15's substantive ideal. But despite the effective manner in which the provision was drafted, and despite the recent guidelines set out in Law, interpretations (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  1
    Adrienne Barnett (2000). Getting a `Get' – the Limits of Law's Authority? N. V. N. (Jurisdiction: Pre-Nuptial Agreement) [1999] 2 F.L.R. 745. [REVIEW] Feminist Legal Studies 8 (2):241-254.
    This note examines the decision of the Family Division of the High Court in N. v. N. (Jurisdiction: Pre-Nuptial Agreement) in which, in the context of Jewish divorce proceedings, the Court found that it had no jurisdiction to order a husband, by specific performance of a marriage agreement, to go through the procedure to obtain a ‘get’ (a hand-written bill of divorcement) allowing his wife to remarry. First, discussion of the case is contextualised broadly within the debate on the (de)merits (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  9
    Samuel Scheffler (2015). Distributive Justice, the Basic Structure and the Place of Private Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 35 (2):213-235.
    In John Rawls’s theory, the role of the principles of justice is to regulate the basic structure of society—its major social, political and economic institutions—and to specify the fair terms of cooperation for free and equal persons. Some have interpreted Rawls as excluding contract law, and perhaps the private law as a whole, from the basic structure. However, this interpretation of Rawls is untenable, given the motivations for his emphasis on the basic structure and the highly inclusive (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  12
    Wojciech Włoch (2013). Epistemological–Normative Function of the Basic Norm in Hans Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law. Dialogue and Universalism 23 (2):25-42.
    The objective of the article is to present Hans Kelsen’s basic norm concept that allows the combination of the two relevant dimensions in relation to juridical science, namely the positivity and validity of law. The role of the concept of basic norm is presented by the author of the Reine Rechtslehre with reference to Kant (read through the works by H. Cohen) as a concept enabling formulation of an answer to the question “To what extent is it possible (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  10
    Edmund Wall (2008). Natural Law and Basic Goods. Philo 11 (1):50-77.
    There would appear to be enormous philosophical differences between some influential exponents in contemporary natural law ethics. It would appear that there are deep and irresolvable philosophical differences between Ralph McInerny, on the one side, and Germain Grisez, Joseph Boyle, and John Finnis, on the other, with regard to both the contents of the basic goods of natural law, and as to whether there is an objective hierarchy among the basic goods themselves. The second of these apparently unbridgeable (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  3
    Joseph Frazier Wall (1976). Social Darwinism and Constitutional Law with Special Reference toLochner V. New York. Annals of Science 33 (5):465-476.
    American historians have generally accepted Richard Hofstadter's thesis that the scientism of Social Darwinism, or more appropriately, Spencerianism, dominated American thought in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, and nowhere more enthusiastically or more purposively than within the conservative business community, which used Herbert Spencer's scientism to justify corporate business practices and to rewrite American Constitutional law to protect property interests against governmental regulations. Following Sharlin's general exposition of Herbert Spencer's scientism, this paper examines in detail the validity of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. George P. Fletcher (1998). Basic Concepts of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press Usa.
    In the United States today criminal justice can vary from state to state, as various states alter the Modern Penal Code to suit their own local preferences and concerns. In Eastern Europe, the post-Communist countries are quickly adopting new criminal codes to reflect their specific national concerns as they gain autonomy from what was once a centralized Soviet policy. As commonalities among countries and states disintegrate, how are we to view the basic concepts of criminal law as a whole? (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Csaba Varga (2013). Contemporary Legal Philosophising: Schmitt, Kelsen, Lukács, Hart, & Law and Literature, with Marxism's Dark Legacy in Central Europe (on Teaching Legal Philosophy in Appendix). Szent István Társulat.
    Reedition of papers in English spanning from 1986 to 2009 /// Historical background -- An imposed legacy -- Twentieth century contemporaneity -- Appendix: The philosophy of teaching legal philosophy in Hungary /// HISTORICAL BACKGROUND -- PHILOSOPHY OF LAW IN CENTRAL & EASTERN EUROPE: A SKETCH OF HISTORY [1999] 11–21 // PHILOSOPHISING ON LAW IN THE TURMOIL OF COMMUNIST TAKEOVER IN HUNGARY (TWO PORTRAITS, INTERWAR AND POSTWAR: JULIUS MOÓR & ISTVÁN LOSONCZY) [2001–2002] 23–39: Julius Moór 23 / István Losonczy 29 // (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  6
    Rudolf Neidert (1971). Legalized Right of Resistance. A Public Law Analysis of Art. 20, Para 4 of the Basic Law. Philosophy and History 4 (1):83-84.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. W. Kneale (1967). FREGE, G. - "The Basic Law of Arithmetic, Exposition of the System". [REVIEW] Mind 76:293.
  32.  13
    K. Abrams (2002). Extraordinary Measures: Protesting Rule of Law Violations After Bush V. Gore. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 21 (2):165-195.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  46
    Alessandro Spena (2014). Iniuria Migrandi: Criminalization of Immigrants and the Basic Principles of the Criminal Law. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (3):635-657.
    In this paper I am specifically concerned with a normative assessment, from the perspective of a principled criminal law theory, of norms criminalizing illegal immigration. The overarching question I will dwell on is one specifically regarding the way of using criminal law which is implied in the enactment of such kinds of norms. My thesis will essentially be that it constitutes a veritable abuse of criminal law. In two senses at least: first, in the sense that by criminalizing illegal immigration (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34.  1
    Avihay Dorfman (2016). Private Law Exceptionalism? Part I: A Basic Difficulty with the Structural Arguments From Bipolarity and Civil Recourse. Law and Philosophy 35 (2):165-191.
    Contemporary discussions of private law theory have sought to divine the deep structure and content of private law by reference to two key distinctions. First, the distinction between private and criminal law has been utilized to flesh out the distinctively bipolar structure of private law. Second, the distinction between formal and distributive equality has served to highlight the special terms of interaction established in private law. In these pages, I take up the former distinction, arguing that its theoretical significance is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Thomas E. Davitt (1968). The Basic Values in Law a Study of the Ethico-Legal Implications of Psychology and Anthropology. American Philosophical Society.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36. John Austin (1906). The Austinian Theory of Law: Being an Edition of Lectures I, V, and Vi of Austin's "Jurisprudence," and of Austin's "Essay on the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence" with Critical Notes and Excursus. F.B. Rothman.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. N. Wrigley, A., Priaulx (ed.) (2013). Ethics, Law and Society, Vol. V. Ashgate.
  38.  98
    W. V. Quine (2004). Quintessence: Basic Readings From the Philosophy of W.V. Quine. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Quintessence for the first time collects Quine's classic essays (such as "Two Dogmas" and "On What There Is") in one volume—and thus offers readers a much ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  39.  1
    Elizabeth Beaumont (2016). Gender Justice V. The “Invisible Hand” of Gender Bias in Law and Society. Hypatia 31 (3):668-686.
    How does so much gender inequality endure in an era when many laws and policies endorse principles of gender equality? This essay examines this dilemma by considering Susan Moller Okin's criticism of “false gender neutrality,” research on implicit bias, and the shifting relation of gender bias to American law. I argue that these are crucial elements of the modern cycle of gender inequality, enabling it to operate through a perverse “invisible-hand” mechanism. This framework helps convey how underlying gender bias influences (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Susan Haack (2011). Pragmatism, Law, and Morality: The Lessons of Buck V. Bell. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 3:66-87.
    Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. – a founding member of the Metaphysical Club, and traditionally regarded as the first legal pragmatist – would eventually become a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. In one of his best-known rulings for the Court, Buck v. Bell , Holmes held that Carrie Buck’s constitutional rights would not be violated by al-lowing the State of Virginia to sterilize her against her will. This disturbing ruling has sometimes been thought to confirm criticisms of Holmes’s moral skepticism. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  4
    C. Kilpatrick (2015). On the Rule of Law and Economic Emergency: The Degradation of Basic Legal Values in Europe's Bailouts. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 35 (2):325-353.
    The norms governing EU sovereign debt conditionality in ‘debtor states’ significantly trouble the Rule of Law. My analysis addresses this central, yet to date ignored, Rule of Law challenge created by the EU economic crisis. I contrast my specific approach with two other Rule of Law strands in current EU scholarship and develop it by placing it within relevant broader literatures on rule of law and emergency. Drawing particularly on Fuller and Waldron, this produces a formal and procedural Rule of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  29
    Joan E. Bertin & Mary S. Henifin (1994). Science, Law, and the Search for Truth in the Courtroom: Lessons From Daubert V. Merrell Dow. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 22 (1):6-20.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  4
    John Finnis (2007). Grounds of Law and Legal Theory: A Response. Legal Theory 13 (3-4):315-344.
    Linking theses of Plato, Wittgenstein, and Weber, section I argues that identification of central cases and settling of focal meanings depend upon the theorist's purpose and, in the case of theory about human affairs—theory adequately attentive to the four irreducible orders in which human persons live and act—upon the purposes for which we intelligibly and intelligently act. Among these purposes, primacy is to be accorded to purposes which are, as best the theorist can judge, reasonable and fit to be adopted (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  3
    P. I. Novgorodtsev (1994). The Idea of Law in the Philosophy of V.S. Solov'ev. Russian Studies in Philosophy 33 (3):49-61.
    Anyone who knows Solov'ev mainly from his mystical speculations and aspirations will of course be surprised to hear that he was a brilliant and outstanding representative of the philosophy of law. One is not immediately able to see how such a supremely real and practical idea as the idea of law [pravo] was able to find a place among his dreams and prophecies. And yet we have all the evidence to affirm that this idea was for him one of the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  14
    José Brunner (2008). Liberal Laws V. The Law of Large Numbers, or How Demographic Rhetoric Arouses Anxiety (in Germany). Law and Ethics of Human Rights 2 (1):54-87.
    This paper presents the metaphysics of liberal rights reasoning on one hand and that of demographic reasoning on the other, as exemplifying two worldviews that both compete and complement each other in the contemporary German public debate on demographic decline. First, this essay outlines the way in which liberal theorists of various outlooks, perfectionist and neutralist alike, assume that a wide range of rights serves not only the interests of those individuals who possess them, but that it constitutes the foundations (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  6
    James Chalmers (2016). Lucia Zedner and Julian V. Roberts: Principles and Values in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Andrew Ashworth. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (1):197-203.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  6
    Anita Allen, Natural Law, Slavery, and the Right to Privacy Tort.
    In 1905 the Supreme Court of Georgia became the first state high court to recognize a freestanding “right to privacy” tort in the common law. The landmark case was Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Co. Must it be a cause for deep jurisprudential concern that the common law right to privacy in wide currency today originated in Pavesich’s explicit judicial interpretation of the requirements of natural law? Must it be an additional worry that the court which originated the common (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  1
    Joanne Conaghan (1996). Equity Rushes in Where Tort Law Fears to Tread: The Court of Appeal Decision in Burris V. Azadani. [REVIEW] Feminist Legal Studies 4 (2):221-228.
    In the present state of the law, there is no tort of harassment. Nor in the light of later authority can the view be upheld that there is no tort of harassment.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  1
    Wu Jiaguo (1982). A Trial Discussion of the Basic Approach to the Issue of the Law of Sufficient Reason. Contemporary Chinese Thought 13 (4):79-83.
    The main problem with the law of sufficient reason lies in whether or not it is universally applicable to all forms of thinking, and especially how it works in the process of inference. If we hold that an inference violates the law of sufficient reason because its premise is false, then it would amount to saying that the law of sufficient reason can meet the requirement of a true premise. As a result, the law of sufficient reason would substitute for (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  2
    David Ray Papke (2004). Book Review: Mark V. Tushnet, Slave Law in the American South: State V. Mann in History and Literature. University Press of Kansas, 2003, ISBN: 0-7006-1270-X (Cloth), 0-7006-1271-8 (Paper). [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de s�Miotique Juridique 17 (4):441-445.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000