Search results for 'basic law v' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Sean Walsh (2012). Comparing Peano Arithmetic, Basic Law V, and Hume's Principle. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (11):1679-1709.score: 720.0
    This paper presents new constructions of models of Hume's Principle and Basic Law V with restricted amounts of comprehension. The techniques used in these constructions are drawn from hyperarithmetic theory and the model theory of fields, and formalizing these techniques within various subsystems of second-order Peano arithmetic allows one to put upper and lower bounds on the interpretability strength of these theories and hence to compare these theories to the canonical subsystems of second-order arithmetic. The main results of this (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Manuel Bremer, Frege's Basic Law V and Cantor's Theorem.score: 720.0
    The following essay reconsiders the ontological and logical issues around Frege’s Basic Law (V). If focuses less on Russell’s Paradox, as most treatments of Frege’s Grundgesetze der Arithmetik (GGA)1 do, but rather on the relation between Frege’s Basic Law (V) and Cantor’s Theorem (CT). So for the most part the inconsistency of Naïve Comprehension (in the context of standard Second Order Logic) will not concern us, but rather the ontological issues central to the conflict between (BLV) and (CT). (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Charles Sayward (2002). Convention T and Basic Law V. Analysis 62 (4):289–292.score: 720.0
    It is argued that Convention T and Basic Law V of Frege’s Grungesetze share three striking similarities. First, they are universal generalizations that are intuitively plausible because they have so many obvious instances. Second, both are false because they yield contradictions. Third, neither gives rise to a paradox.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Liu Jingxian (2012). Second-Order Positive Comprehension and Frege's Basic Law V. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 7 (3):367-377.score: 630.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Richard Heck (2005). Julius Caesar and Basic Law V. Dialectica 59 (2):161–178.score: 540.0
    This paper dates from about 1994: I rediscovered it on my hard drive in the spring of 2002. It represents an early attempt to explore the connections between the Julius Caesar problem and Frege's attitude towards Basic Law V. Most of the issues discussed here are ones treated rather differently in my more recent papers "The Julius Caesar Objection" and "Grundgesetze der Arithmetik I 10". But the treatment here is more accessible, in many ways, providing more context and a (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Adam Rieger (2002). Paradox Without Basic Law V: A Problem with Frege’s Ontology. Analysis 62 (276):327–330.score: 450.0
  7. Michael Dummett (1994). Chairman's Address: Basic Law V. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94:243--251.score: 450.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. George Boolos & Peter Clark (1993). Basic Law (V). Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 67:213 - 249.score: 450.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jan Harald Alnes (1999). Sense and Basic Law V in Frege's Logicism. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 4:1-30.score: 450.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Nathaniel Law (2006). Abortion: Supreme Court Avoids Disturbing Abortion Precedents by Ruling on Grounds of Remedy-Ayotte V. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England. Journal of Law, Medicine Ethics 34 (2):469-471.score: 420.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Francesca Boccuni (2010). Plural grundgesetze. Studia Logica 96 (2):315-330.score: 270.0
    PG ( Plural Grundgesetze ) is a predicative monadic second-order system which exploits the notion of plural quantification and a few Fregean devices, among which a formulation of the infamous Basic Law V. It is shown that second-order Peano arithmetic can be derived in PG. I also investigate the philosophical issue of predicativism connected to PG. In particular, as predicativism about concepts seems rather un-Fregean, I analyse whether there is a way to make predicativism compatible with Frege’s logicism.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Boccuni (2011). On the Consistency of a Plural Theory of Frege’s Grundgesetze. Studia Logica 97 (3):329-345.score: 270.0
    PG (Plural Grundgesetze) is a predicative monadic second-order system which is aimed to derive second-order Peano arithmetic. It exploits the notion of plural quantification and a few Fregean devices, among which the infamous Basic Law V. In this paper, a model-theoretical consistency proof for the system PG is provided.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. G. Hasenjaeger (1997). Furth Montgomery. Editor's Introduction. The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, Exposition of the System, by Frege Gottlob, Translated and Edited by Furth Montgomery, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles 1964, Pp. V–Lvii. Frege G.. Introduction. English Translation of Pp. V–Xxvi of 4910. The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, Exposition of the System, by Frege Gottlob, Translated and Edited by Furth Montgomery, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles 1964, Pp. 1-25. Frege Gottlob ... [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (4):671-672.score: 225.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. George Boolos (1993). Whence the Contradiction? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 67:211--233.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Emily Grabham (2002). Law V Canada: New Directions for Equality Under the Canadian Charter? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (4):641-661.score: 168.0
    The equality provision in section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1982 was drafted with a vision of promoting substantive equality. Following challenges to this vision during the 1990s by a group of conservative Supreme Court judges, the recent judgment of Iacobucci J in Law v Canada (1999) has been welcomed for reasserting section 15's substantive ideal. But despite the effective manner in which the provision was drafted, and despite the recent guidelines set out in Law, interpretations (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Adrienne Barnett (2000). Getting a `Get' – the Limits of Law's Authority? N. V. N. (Jurisdiction: Pre-Nuptial Agreement) [1999] 2 F.L.R. 745. [REVIEW] Feminist Legal Studies 8 (2):241-254.score: 156.0
    This note examines the decision of the Family Division of the High Court in N. v. N. (Jurisdiction: Pre-Nuptial Agreement) in which, in the context of Jewish divorce proceedings, the Court found that it had no jurisdiction to order a husband, by specific performance of a marriage agreement, to go through the procedure to obtain a ‘get’ (a hand-written bill of divorcement) allowing his wife to remarry. First, discussion of the case is contextualised broadly within the debate on the (de)merits (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Edmund Wall (2008). Natural Law and Basic Goods. Philo 11 (1):50-77.score: 144.0
    There would appear to be enormous philosophical differences between some influential exponents in contemporary natural law ethics. It would appear that there are deep and irresolvable philosophical differences between Ralph McInerny, on the one side, and Germain Grisez, Joseph Boyle, and John Finnis, on the other, with regard to both the contents of the basic goods of natural law, and as to whether there is an objective hierarchy among the basic goods themselves. The second of these apparently unbridgeable (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Wojciech Włoch (2013). Epistemological–Normative Function of the Basic Norm in Hans Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law. Dialogue and Universalism 23 (2):25-42.score: 144.0
    The objective of the article is to present Hans Kelsen’s basic norm concept that allows the combination of the two relevant dimensions in relation to juridical science, namely the positivity and validity of law. The role of the concept of basic norm is presented by the author of the Reine Rechtslehre with reference to Kant (read through the works by H. Cohen) as a concept enabling formulation of an answer to the question “To what extent is it possible (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Rudolf Neidert (1971). Legalized Right of Resistance. A Public Law Analysis of Art. 20, Para 4 of the Basic Law. Philosophy and History 4 (1):83-84.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. José Brunner (2008). Liberal Laws V. The Law of Large Numbers, or How Demographic Rhetoric Arouses Anxiety (in Germany). Law and Ethics of Human Rights 2 (1):54-87.score: 132.7
    This paper presents the metaphysics of liberal rights reasoning on one hand and that of demographic reasoning on the other, as exemplifying two worldviews that both compete and complement each other in the contemporary German public debate on demographic decline. First, this essay outlines the way in which liberal theorists of various outlooks, perfectionist and neutralist alike, assume that a wide range of rights serves not only the interests of those individuals who possess them, but that it constitutes the foundations (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Alessandro Spena (forthcoming). Iniuria Migrandi: Criminalization of Immigrants and the Basic Principles of the Criminal Law. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-23.score: 132.0
    In this paper I am specifically concerned with a normative assessment, from the perspective of a principled criminal law theory, of norms criminalizing illegal immigration. The overarching question I will dwell on is one specifically regarding the way of using criminal law which is implied in the enactment of such kinds of norms. My thesis will essentially be that it constitutes a veritable abuse of criminal law. In two senses at least: first, in the sense that by criminalizing illegal immigration (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. John Austin (1906/1983). The Austinian Theory of Law: Being an Edition of Lectures I, V, and Vi of Austin's "Jurisprudence," and of Austin's "Essay on the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence" with Critical Notes and Excursus. F.B. Rothman.score: 132.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. J. M. Bochenski (1963). The Basic Laws of the Dialectic. The Law of the Transition of Quantitative Changes Into Qualitative. In. In Joseph M. Bochenski (ed.), The Dogmatic Principles of Soviet Philosophy (as of 1958). Dordrecht, Holland, D. Reidel Pub. Co.. 16--18.score: 126.7
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. W. V. Quine (2004). Quintessence: Basic Readings From the Philosophy of W.V. Quine. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.score: 126.0
    Quintessence for the first time collects Quine's classic essays (such as "Two Dogmas" and "On What There Is") in one volume—and thus offers readers a much ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Joan E. Bertin & Mary S. Henifin (1994). Science, Law, and the Search for Truth in the Courtroom: Lessons From Daubert V. Merrell Dow. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 22 (1):6-20.score: 126.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. K. Abrams (2002). Extraordinary Measures: Protesting Rule of Law Violations After Bush V. Gore. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 21 (2):165-195.score: 126.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. James Chalmers (2013). Lucia Zedner and Julian V. Roberts: Principles and Values in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Andrew Ashworth. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-7.score: 126.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Anita Allen, Natural Law, Slavery, and the Right to Privacy Tort.score: 126.0
    In 1905 the Supreme Court of Georgia became the first state high court to recognize a freestanding “right to privacy” tort in the common law. The landmark case was Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Co. Must it be a cause for deep jurisprudential concern that the common law right to privacy in wide currency today originated in Pavesich’s explicit judicial interpretation of the requirements of natural law? Must it be an additional worry that the court which originated the common (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. David Ray Papke (2004). Book Review: Mark V. Tushnet, Slave Law in the American South: State V. Mann in History and Literature. University Press of Kansas, 2003, ISBN: 0-7006-1270-X (Cloth), 0-7006-1271-8 (Paper). [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de s�Miotique Juridique 17 (4):441-445.score: 126.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Joanne Conaghan (1996). Equity Rushes in Where Tort Law Fears to Tread: The Court of Appeal Decision in Burris V. Azadani. [REVIEW] Feminist Legal Studies 4 (2):221-228.score: 126.0
    In the present state of the law, there is no tort of harassment. Nor in the light of later authority can the view be upheld that there is no tort of harassment.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Anne Morris (2003). Embodying the Law:Coker and Osamor V. The Lord Chancellorand the Lord Chancellor's Department [2002]I.R.L.R. 80 (Court of Appeal). [REVIEW] Feminist Legal Studies 11 (1):45-55.score: 126.0
    In Britiain, it is unlawful,regardless of the motive of the discriminator,to refuse to give a woman a job because of hersex. On the other hand, the U.K. case ofCoker and Osamor v. The Lord Chancellor and theLord Chancellor's Department suggests that itis permissible, by `pre-selecting' anindividual man, to rule out any possible femalecandidates. The singular facts of this caseshould not disguise the troubling conclusionthat while sex (and race) discrimination maysometimes be blatant and deliberate, morefrequently it is subtle and routine. Furthermore, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. V. D. Perevalov (2001). Nauchnye Issledovaniia V Iuridicheskom Vuze (SIuI—UrGIuA, 1931—2001 Gg.)[Scientific Research in a University of Law. Sverdlovsk Institute of Law—Ural State Law Academy] Pravovedenie. [REVIEW] Jurisprudence 1:14.score: 126.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. André den Exter (ed.) (2011). International Health Law and Ethics: Basic Documents. Maklu ;.score: 124.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Francis Cheneval (2000). Steven V. Hicks, International Law and the Possibility of a Just World Order. An Essay on Hegel's Universalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):457-459.score: 120.0
  35. Robert Alexy (1994). Basic Rights and Democracy in Jurgen Habermas's Procedural Paradigm of the Law. Ratio Juris 7 (2):227-238.score: 120.0
  36. C. D. Broad (1950). The Moral Law, or Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. By H. J. Paton. (Hutchinson's University Library. Pp. V + 151.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 25 (92):85-.score: 120.0
  37. A. H. Campbell (1946). Roman Law F. De Zulueta: The Roman Law of Sale: Introduction and Select Texts. Pp. V+265. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1945. Cloth, 21s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (01):45-46.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Kurt Wilk (1941). Law and the State as Pure Ideas: Critical Notes on the Basic Concepts of Kelsen's Legal Philosophy. Ethics 51 (2):158-184.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. C. J. Hamilton (1906). Book Review:Law and Opinion in England. A. V. Dicey. [REVIEW] Ethics 16 (2):257-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Adriaan Lanni (2011). Athenian Forensic Oratory (V.) Wohl Law's Cosmos. Juridical Discourse in Athenian Forensic Oratory. Pp. Xiv + 392. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Cased, £60, US$99. ISBN: 978-0-521-11074-7. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 61 (1):48-50.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Jeffrey A. Bernstein (2013). The Weimar Moment: Liberalism, Political Theology, and Law. Edited by Leonard V. Kaplan and Rudy Koshar. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2012. [REVIEW] Constellations 20 (3):508-509.score: 120.0
  42. D. M. Carter (2008). Athenian Citizenship (V.) Farenga Citizen and Self in Ancient Greece. Individuals Performing Justice and the Law. Pp. X + 592. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Cased, £55, US$90. ISBN: 978-0-521-84559-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 58 (02):518-.score: 120.0
  43. H. J. Rose (1927). Roman History and Pre-History Histoire Romaine. Tome Premier: Des Origines à l'Achèvement de la Conquête (133 Avant J.-C). Par Ettore Pais. Adapté d'Après le Manuscrit Italien Par Jean Bayet. Pp. 144. Fascicule I. Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France, 1926. (Part III. Of Histoire Ancienne, Edited by Glotz). Rome the Law-Giver. By J. Declareuil, Translated by E. A. Parker. Pp. Xvi + 400. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co., 1927. 16s. Net. Primitive Italy and the Beginnings of Roman Imperialism. By Léon Homo. Translated by V. Gordon Childe. Pp. Xi + 371. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co., 1927. 16s. Net. (Two Volumes of History of Civilisation, Edited by Ogden.). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (02):71-72.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. J. Finnis & G. Grisez (1981). The Basic Principles of Natural Law: A Reply to Ralph McInerny. American Journal of Jurisprudence 26 (1):21-31.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Sven Günther (2010). The Lex Portorii Asiae (M.) Cottier, (M.H.) Crawford, (C.V.) Crowther , (J.-L.) Ferrary, (B.M.) Levick, (O.) Salomies, (M.) Wörrle (Edd.) The Customs Law of Asia. Pp. Xxii + 370, Ills, Map. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Cased, £60. ISBN: 978-0-19-955151-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (01):215-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Ishmael D. Norman (2012). The Constitutional Mandate for Judge-Made-Law and Judicial Activism: A Case Study of the Matter of Elizabeth Vaah V. Lister Hospital and Fertility Centre. Open Ethics Journal 6 (1):1-7.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. George P. Fletcher (1999). [Book Review] Basic Concepts of Criminal Law. [REVIEW] Criminal Justice Ethics 18 (2):58-67.score: 120.0
  48. P. B. R. Forbes (1953). Athenian Law of Property John V. A. Fine: Horoi. Studies in Mortgage, Real Security, and Land Tenure in Ancient Athens. (Hesperia, Supplement IX.) Pp. X+216; 7 Plates. American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 1951. Paper, $7.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 3 (02):109-111.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. A. R. W. Harrison (1957). Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, Book V, and the Law of Athens. Journal of Hellenic Studies 77:42.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. David Ingram (1991). Contractualism, Democracy, and Social Law: Basic Antinomies in Liberal Thought. Philosophy and Social Criticism 17 (4):265-296.score: 120.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000