8 found
Sort by:
  1. Umit D. Yalcin, Does Physicalism Require a Supervenience Thesis?
    Many authors have taken up the challenge of formulating physicalism as a supervenience thesis. These endeavors have met with varying response, but it seems that the general consensus still remains that a supervenience thesis that is both sufficient and necessary for physicalism has yet to be developed. Terence Horgan1 and Jaegwon Kim2 have most famously argued that supervenience theses are not sufficiently strong for physicalism. Nonetheless, several recent articles suggest that there are philosophers who still hold out hope for some (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ümit D. Yalçın (2011). Terror of Knowing: Can an Empiricist Avoid Unwanted A Priori Knowledge? In Michael J. Shaffer & Michael Veber (eds.), What Place for the a Priori? Open Court. 241.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Umit D. Yalcin (2001). Solutions and Dissolutions of the Underdetermination Problem. Noûs 35 (3):394 - 418.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ümit D. Yalçin (2001). Solutions and Dissolutions of the Underdetermination Problem. Noûs 35 (3):394–418.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Elias E. Savellos & Ümit D. Yalçin (eds.) (1995). Supervenience: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
    Supervenience is one of the 'hot discoveries' of recent analytic philosophy, and this collection of new essays on the topic represents a 'state of the art' examination of it and its application to major areas of philosophy. The interest in supervenience has much to do with the flexibility of the concept. To say that x supervenes on y indicates a degree of dependence without committing one to the view that x can be reduced to y. Thus supervenience is a relationship (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ümit D. Yalçin (1993). The Nature of Basic Beliefs and the Regress of Justification. Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (4):519-525.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Ümit D. Yalcin (1993). The Nature of Basic Beliefs and the Regress of Justification. Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (4):519-525.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ümit D. Yalçin (1992). Skeptical Arguments From Underdetermination. Philosophical Studies 68 (1):1 - 34.