Search results for '*Visual Perception' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Zenon W. Pylyshyn (1999). Is Vision Continuous with Cognition? The Case for Cognitive Impenetrability of Visual Perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):341-365.score: 84.0
    Although the study of visual perception has made more progress in the past 40 years than any other area of cognitive science, there remain major disagreements as to how closely vision is tied to general cognition. This paper sets out some of the arguments for both sides (arguments from computer vision, neuroscience, Psychophysics, perceptual learning and other areas of vision science) and defends the position that an important part of visual perception, which may be called early vision or (...)
    Direct download (21 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Philip A. Glotzbach (1992). Determining the Primary Problem of Visual Perception: A Gibsonian Response to the Correlation' Objection. Philosophical Psychology 5 (1):69-94.score: 84.0
    Fodor & Pylyshyn (1981) criticize J. J. Gibson's ecological account of perception for failing to address what I call the 'correlation problem' in visual perception. That is, they charge that Gibson cannot explain how perceivers learn to correlate detectable properties of the light with perceptible properties of the environment. Furthermore, they identify the correlation problem as a crucial issue for any theory of visual perception, what I call a 'primary problem'—i.e. a problem which plays a definitive role (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Joel Norman (2001). Two Visual Systems and Two Theories of Perception: An Attempt to Reconcile the Constructivist and Ecological Approaches. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):73-96.score: 81.0
    The two contrasting theoretical approaches to visual perception, the constructivist and the ecological, are briefly presented and illustrated through their analyses of space and size perception. Earlier calls for their reconciliation and unification are reviewed. Neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and psychophysical evidence for the existence of two quite distinct visual systems, the ventral and the dorsal, is presented. These two perceptual systems differ in their functions; the ventral system's central function is that of identification, while the dorsal system is mainly (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Wei Ji Ma, Fred Hamker & Christof Koch (2006). Neural Mechanisms Underlying Temporal Aspects of Conscious Visual Perception. In Haluk Ögmen & Bruno G. Breitmeyer (eds.), The First Half Second: The Microgenesis and Temporal Dynamics of Unconscious and Conscious Visual Processes. Mit Press. 275-294.score: 78.0
  5. Claudio Babiloni, Fabrizio Vecchio, Alessandro Bultrini, Gian Luca Romani & Paolo Maria Rossini (2006). Pre- and Poststimulus Alpha Rhythms Are Related to Conscious Visual Perception: A High-Resolution EEC Study. Cerebral Cortex 16 (12):1690-1700.score: 75.0
  6. Daniel A. Pollen (2003). Explicit Neural Representations, Recursive Neural Networks and Conscious Visual Perception. Cerebral Cortex 13 (8):807-814.score: 75.0
  7. Charles W. Eriksen & Terry Spencer (1969). Rate of Information Processing in Visual Perception: Some Results and Methodological Considerations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p2):1.score: 75.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Charles S. Harris & Ralph Norman Haber (1963). Selective Attention and Coding in Visual Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (4):328.score: 75.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stuart Appelle & Jacqueline J. Goodnow (1970). Haptic and Visual Perception of Proportion. Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1):47.score: 75.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. K. W. Braly (1933). The Influence of Past Experience in Visual Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (5):613.score: 75.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Brant Clark & Ashton Graybiel (1962). Visual Perception of the Horizontal During Prolonged Exposure to Radial Acceleration on a Centrifuge. Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (3):294.score: 75.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Charles W. Eriksen & James F. Collins (1965). Reinterpretation of One Form of Backward and Forward Masking in Visual Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (4):343.score: 75.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Charles W. Eriksen & Richard A. Steffy (1964). Short-Term Memory and Retroactive Interference in Visual Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (5):423.score: 75.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. J. Vincent Filoteo, Frances J. Friedrich, Catherine Rabbel & John L. Stricker (2002). Visual Perception Without Awareness in a Patient with Posterior Cortical Atrophy: Impaired Explicit but Not Implicit Processing of Global Information. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 8 (3):461-472.score: 75.0
  15. Robert Fried & Richard G. Lathrop (1965). Effect of Extraneous Stimulation on the Visual Perception of Verticality: A Failure to Replicate. Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (3):327.score: 75.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Ralph Norman Haber (1964). A Replication of Selective Attention and Coding in Visual Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (4):402.score: 75.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. G. D. Higginson (1926). Visual Perception in the White Rat. Journal of Experimental Psychology 9 (4):337.score: 75.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Daniel Kahneman & Joel Norman (1964). The Time-Intensity Relation in Visual Perception as a Function of Observer's Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):215.score: 75.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jacques Kaswan & Stephen Young (1963). Stimulus Exposure Time, Brightness, and Spatial Factors as Determinants of Visual Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (2):113.score: 75.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. F. P. Kilpatrick & W. H. Ittelson (1951). Three Demonstrations Involving the Visual Perception of Movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (6):394.score: 75.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. I. Krechevsky (1938). An Experimental Investigation of the Principle of Proximity in the Visual Perception of the Rat. Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 (6):497.score: 75.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Koiti Motokawa (1953). Retinal Traces and Visual Perception of Movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (6):369.score: 75.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Thomas Schmidt (2000). Visual Perception Without Awareness: Priming Responses by Color. In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Neural Correlates of Consciousness. MIT Press. 157--179.score: 75.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. R. O. Van Waters (1934). Visual Perception of Horizontal Movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 17 (2):223.score: 75.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Hans Wallach, D. N. O'Connell & Ulric Neisser (1953). The Memory Effect of Visual Perception of Three-Dimensional Form. Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (5):360.score: 75.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Seymour Wapner, Heinz Werner & Ricardo B. Morant (1951). Experiments on Sensory-Tonic Field Theory of Perception. III. Effect of Body Rotation on the Visual Perception of Verticality. [REVIEW] Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (5):351.score: 75.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Seymour Wapner, Heinz Werner & Kenneth A. Chandler (1951). Experiments on Sensory-Tonic Field Theory of Perception: I. Effect of Extraneous Stimulation on the Visual Perception of Verticality. Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (5):341.score: 75.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Heinz Werner, Seymour Wapner & Kenneth A. Chandler (1951). Experiments on Sensory-Tonic Field Theory of Perception: II. Effect of Supported and Unsupported Tilt of the Body on the Visual Perception of Verticality. Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (5):346.score: 75.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Arnold Wilkins & Anne Stewart (1974). The Time Course of Lateral Asymmetries in Visual Perception of Letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (5):905.score: 75.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Harry Heft (1989). Affordances and the Body: An Intentional Analysis of Gibson's Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19 (1):1–30.score: 72.0
    In his ecological approach to perception, james gibson introduced the concept of affordance to refer to the perceived meaning of environmental objects and events. this paper examines the relational and causal character of affordances, as well as the grounds for extending affordances beyond environmental features with transcultural meaning to include those features with culturally-specific meaning. such an extension is seen as warranted once affordances are grounded in an intentional analysis of perception. toward this end, aspects of merleau-ponty's treatment (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Farid Masrour, Space Perception, Visual Dissonance and the Fate of Standard Representationalism.score: 72.0
    This paper argues that a common form of representationalism has trouble accommodating empirical findings about visual space perception. Vision science tells us that the visual system systematically gives rise to different experiences of the same spatial property. This, combined with a naturalistic account of content, suggests that the same spatial property can have different veridical looks. I use this to argue that a common form of representationalism about spatial experience must be rejected. I conclude by considering alternatives to this (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jeff Coulter (1990). The Praxiology of Perception: Visual Orientations and Practical Action. Inquiry 251 (September):251-272.score: 72.0
    A range of arguments are presented to demonstrate that (1) human visual orientations are conceptually constituted (concept?bound); (2) the concept?boundedness of visual orientations does not require a cognitivist account according to which a mental process of ?inference? or of ?interpretation? must be postulated to accompany a purely ?optical? registration of ?wavelengths of light?, ?photons?, or contentless ?information'; (3) concept?bound visual orientations are not all instances of ?seeing as?, contrary to some currently prominent cognitivist accounts; (4) the dispute between cognitivist and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Thomas Busigny Bruno Rossion, Laurence Dricot, Rainer Goebel (2010). Holistic Face Categorization in Higher Order Visual Areas of the Normal and Prosopagnosic Brain: Toward a Non-Hierarchical View of Face Perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 4.score: 72.0
    How a visual stimulus is initially categorized as a face in a network of human brain areas remains largely unclear. Hierarchical neuro-computational models of face perception assume that the visual stimulus is first decomposed in local parts in lower order visual areas. These parts would then be combined into a global representation in higher order face-sensitive areas of the occipito-temporal cortex. Here we tested this view in fMRI with visual stimuli that are categorized as faces based on their global (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Matthew Winn, Ariane Rhone, Monita Chatterjee & William Idsardi (2013). The Use of Auditory and Visual Context in Speech Perception by Listeners with Normal Hearing and Listeners with Cochlear Implants. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 72.0
    There is a wide range of acoustic and visual variability across different talkers and different speaking contexts. Listeners with normal hearing accommodate that variability in ways that facilitate efficient perception, but it is not known whether listeners with cochlear implants can do the same. In this study, listeners with normal hearing (NH) and listeners with cochlear implants (CIs) were tested for accommodation to auditory and visual phonetic contexts created by gender-driven speech differences as well as vowel coarticulation and lip (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Matthew Soteriou (2000). The Particularity of Visual Perception. European Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):173-189.score: 69.0
  36. John J. Drummond (1979). On Seeing a Material Thing in Space: The Role of Kinaesthesis in Visual Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (September):19-32.score: 69.0
  37. Nicholas P. Holmes & Charles Spence (2006). Beyond the Body Schema: Visual, Prosthetic, and Technological Contributions to Bodily Perception and Awareness. In Günther Knoblich, Ian M. Thornton, Marc Grosjean & Maggie Shiffrar (eds.), Human Body Perception From the Inside Out. Oxford University Press. 15-64.score: 69.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Ralph Schumacher (1998). Visual Perception and Blindsight: The Role of the Phenomenal Qualities. Acta Analytica 20 (20):71-82.score: 69.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Stephen J. Boulter (2004). Metaphysical Realism as a Pre-Condition of Visual Perception. Biology and Philosophy 19 (2):243-261.score: 66.0
    In this paper I present a transcendental argument based on the findings of cognitive psychology and neurophysiology which invites two conclusions: First and foremost, that a pre-condition of visual perception itself is precisely what the Aristotelian and other commonsense realists maintain, namely, the independent existence of a featured, or pre-packaged world; second, this finding, combined with other reflections, suggests that, contra McDowell and other neo-Kantians, human beings have access to things as they are in the world via non-projective (...). These two conclusions taken together form the basis of Aristotelian metaphysical realism and a refutation of the neo-Kantian two-factor approach to perception. (shrink)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Morten Overgaard, Julian Rote, Kim Mouridsen & Thomas Zoega Ramsoy (2006). Is Conscious Perception Gradual or Dichotomous? A Comparison of Report Methodologies During a Visual Task. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (4):700-708.score: 66.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Pawel Grabarczyk (forthcoming). How to Talk (Precisely) About Visual Perception. The Case of the Duck/Rabbit. In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophy of Language and Linguistics. The Legacy of Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein. De Guyter.score: 66.0
    In Remarks on the philosophy of psychology Wittgenstein uses ambiguous illusions to investigate the problematic relation of perception and interpretation. I use this problem as a starting point for developing a conceptual framework capable of expressing problems associated with visual perception in a precise manner. I do this by discerning between subjective and objective meaning of the term “to see” and by specifying the beliefs which are to be ascribed to the observer when we assert that she sees (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Ramesh Srinivasan & Sanja Petrovic (2006). Meg Phase Follows Conscious Perception During Binocular Rivalry Induced by Visual Stream Segregation. Cerebral Cortex 16 (5):597-608.score: 66.0
  43. J. Eriksson, A. Larsson, K. Alstrom & Lars Nyberg (2004). Visual Consciousness: Dissociating the Neural Correlates of Perceptual Transitions From Sustained Perception with fMRI. Consciousness and Cognition 13 (1):61-72.score: 66.0
  44. Henning Schmidgen (2004). Pictures, Preparations, and Living Processes: The Production of Immediate Visual Perception (Anschauung) in Late-19th-Century Physiology. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 37 (3):477 - 513.score: 66.0
    This paper addresses the visual culture of late-19th-century experimental physiology. Taking the case of Johann Nepomuk Czermak (1828-1873) as a key example, it argues that images played a crucial role in acquiring experimental physiological skills. Czermak, Emil Du Bois-Reymond (1818-1896) and other late-19th-century physiologists sought to present the achievements and perspective of their discipline by way of "immediate visual perception (unmittelbare Anschauung)." However, the images they produced and presented for this purpose were strongly mediated. By means of specifically designed (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. S. E. Asch & H. A. Witkin (1948). Studies in Space Orientation: I. Perception of the Upright with Displaced Visual Fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (3):325.score: 66.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. James J. Gibson & Frederick N. Dibble (1952). Exploratory Experiments on the Stimulus Conditions for the Perception of a Visual Surface. Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (6):414.score: 66.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. H. A. Witkin & S. E. Asch (1948). Studies in Space Orientation. III. Perception of the Upright in the Absence of a Visual Field. Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (5):603.score: 66.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Andy C. H. Lee, Lok-Kin Yeung & Morgan D. Barense (2012). The Hippocampus and Visual Perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6.score: 63.0
    In this review, we will discuss the idea that the hippocampus may be involved in both memory and perception, contrary to theories that posit functional and neuroanatomical segregation of these processes. This suggestion is based on a number of recent neuropsychological and functional neuroimaging studies that have demonstrated that the hippocampus is involved in the visual discrimination of complex spatial scene stimuli. We argue that these findings cannot be explained by long-term memory or working memory processing or, in the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. John Campbell (2007). What's the Role of Spatial Awareness in Visual Perception of Objects? Mind and Language 22 (5):548–562.score: 60.0
    I set out two theses. The first is Lynn Robertson’s: (a) spatial awareness is a cause of object perception. A natural counterpoint is: (b) spatial awareness is a cause of your ability to make accurate verbal reports about a perceived object. Zenon Pylyshyn has criticized both. I argue that nonetheless, the burden of the evidence supports both (a) and (b). Finally, I argue conscious visual perception of an object has a different causal role to both: (i) non-conscious (...) of the object, and (ii) experience, e.g. hallucination, that may be subjectively indiscriminable from, but is not, perception of the object. (shrink)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Nicoletta Orlandi (2011). Embedded Seeing-As: Multi-Stable Visual Perception Without Interpretation. Philosophical Psychology 25 (4):1-19.score: 60.0
    Standard models of visual perception hold that vision is an inferential or interpretative process. Such models are said to be superior to competing, non-inferential views in explanatory power. In particular, they are said to be capable of explaining a number of otherwise mysterious, visual phenomena such as multi-stable perception. Multi-stable perception paradigmatically occurs in the presence of ambiguous figures, single images that can give rise to two or more distinct percepts. Different interpretations are said to produce the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000