Works by A. Bartels ( view other items matching `A. Bartels`, view all matches )
Disambiguations:
Andreas Bartels [12]A. Bartels [1]

13 found
Sort by:
  1. Andreas Bartels, Binocular Rivalry: A Time Dependence of Eye and Stimulus Contributions.
    Nikos K. Logothetis University of Manchester, Manchester, UK In binocular rivalry, the visual percept alternates stochastically between two dichoptically presented stimuli. It is established that both processes related to the eye of origin and binocular, stimulus-related processes account for these fluctuations in conscious perception. Here we studied how their relative contributions vary over time. We applied brief disruptions to rivalry displays, concurrent with an optional eye swap, at varying time intervals after one stimulus became visible (dominant). We found that early (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Andreas Bartels, fMRI and its Interpretations: An Illustration on Directional Selectivity in Area V5/MT.
    fMRI is a tool to study brain function noninvasively that can reliably identify sites of neural involvement for a given task. However, to what extent can fMRI signals be related to measures obtained in electrophysiology? Can the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal be interpreted as spatially pooled spiking activity? Here we combine knowledge from neurovascular coupling, functional imaging and neurophysiology to discuss whether fMRI has succeeded in demonstrating one of the most established functional properties in the visual brain, namely directional selectivity in the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Albert Newen & Andreas Bartels (2007). Animal Minds and the Possession of Concepts. Philosophical Psychology 20 (3):283 – 308.
    In the recent literature on concepts, two extreme positions concerning animal minds are predominant: the one that animals possess neither concepts nor beliefs, and the one that some animals possess concepts as well as beliefs. A characteristic feature of this controversy is the lack of consensus on the criteria for possessing a concept or having a belief. Addressing this deficit, we propose a new theory of concepts which takes recent case studies of complex animal behavior into account. The main aim (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Andreas Bartels (2006). Defending the Structural Concept of Representation. Theoria 21 (55):7-19.
    The aim of this paper is to defend the structural concept of representation, as defined by homomorphisms, against its main objections, namely: logical objections, the objection from misrepresentation, theobjection from failing necessity, and the copy theory objection. The logical objections can be met by reserving the relation.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. A. Bartels, H. Lyre & M. Esfeld (2004). Holism in the Philosophy of Physics: An Introduction. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):597-599.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Andreas Bartels (2001). Roberto Torretti, Philosophy of Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. Erkenntnis 55 (1):127-132.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Andreas Bartels (1999). Objects or Events?: Towards an Ontology for Quantum Field Theory. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):184.
    The recent work of Paul Teller and Sunny Auyang in the philosophy of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) has stimulated the search for the fundamental entities in this theory. In QFT, the classical notion of a particle collapses. The theory does not only exclude classical, i.e., spatiotemporally identifiable particles, but it makes particles of the same type conceptually indistinguishable. Teller and Auyang have proposed competing ersatz-ontologies to account for the 'loss of particles': field quanta vs. field events. Both ontologies, however, suffer (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Semir Zeki & Andreas Bartels (1999). Toward a Theory of Visual Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (2):225-59.
    The visual brain consists of several parallel, functionally specialized processing systems, each having several stages (nodes) which terminate their tasks at different times; consequently, simultaneously presented attributes are perceived at the same time if processed at the same node and at different times if processed by different nodes. Clinical evidence shows that these processing systems can act fairly autonomously. Damage restricted to one system compromises specifically the perception of the attribute that that system is specialized for; damage to a given (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Andreas Bartels (1996). Modern Essentialism and the Problem of Individuation of Spacetime Points. Erkenntnis 45 (1):25--43.
    In this paper Modern Essentialism is used to solve a problem of individuation of spacetime points in General Relativity that has been raised by a New Leibnizian Argument against spacetime substantivalism, elaborated by Earman and Norton. An earlier essentialistic solution, proposed by Maudlin, is criticized as being against both the spirit of metrical essentialism and the fundamental principles of General Relativity. I argue for a modified essentialistic account of spacetime points that avoids those obstacles.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Andreas Bartels (1995). Chains of Meaning: A Model for Concept Formation in Contemporary Physics Theories. Synthese 105 (3):347 - 379.
    The rationality of scientific concept formation in theory transitions, challenged by the thesis of semantic incommensurability, can be restored by theChains of Meaning approach to concept formation. According to this approach, concepts of different, succeeding theories may be identified with respect to referential meaning, in spite of grave diversity of the mathematical structures characterizing them in their respective theories. The criterion of referential identity for concepts is that they meet a relation ofsemantic embedding, i.e. that the embedding concept can be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Andreas Bartels (1990). Weshalb Implizite Definitionen Nicht Genug Sind. Bedeutungstheorien Und Das Verständnis Physikalischer Begriffe. Erkenntnis 32 (2):269 - 281.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Andreas Bartels (1987). Kausalität Ohne Vorhersagbarkeit — Eine These Des Empirismus Im Konflikt Mit der Allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 18 (1-2).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Andreas Bartels (1982). The Structure of Time. Grazer Philosophische Studien 15:223-227.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation