58 found
Order:
  1.  6
    A. C. Moorhouse (1946). An with the Future. Classical Quarterly 40 (1-2):1-.
    The construction of ν with the future has been hotly denied as impossible, so far as Attic Greek and indeed post-Homeric Greek generally are concerned. The opponents of the construction have had among their number such scholars as Dawes and Cobet; and of late, it seems, editors of texts generally. The view of Cobet is given on p. 469 of his Miscellanea Critica, with reference to Demosth. 9. 70 πάλαι τις δέως ν σως ρωτήσων κάθηται. Cobet, who has been followed (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  5
    A. C. Moorhouse (1966). Δημιουρλóς Analysed Françoise Bader: Les Composés Grecs du Type de Demiourgos. (Études Et Commentaires, Lvii.) Pp. Ix+199. Paris: Klincksieck, 1965. Paper, 30 Fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (03):375-377.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  21
    A. C. Moorhouse (1948). On Negativing Greek Participles, Where the Leading Verbs Are of a Type to Require Μή. Classical Quarterly 42 (1-2):35-.
    It is one of the attractions of Greek syntax that it provides an abundance of usages which require careful discrimination, if we are to appreciate their value; and which at the same time present problems of interpretation which have not been completely solved. This is particularly the case with the use of the negatives, and it is one of these constructions with which we are concerned here.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  4
    A. C. Moorhouse (1990). A Philological Feast (Editor[s] Not Stated): ΗΔΙΣΤΟΝ ΛΟΓΟΔΣΙΠΝΟΝ. Logopédies: Mélanges de Philologie Et de Linguistique Grecques Offerts À Jean Taillardat. Pp. Xiv + 262; 1 Photograph and Drawings. Paris: Peeters/Selaf, 1988. Paper, B. Frs. 1,200. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (01):86-87.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  4
    A. C. Moorhouse (1990). A Philological Feast. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (1):86-87.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  4
    A. C. Moorhouse (1984). Françoise Skoda: Le Redoublement expressif: un universal linguistique. Analyse du procédé en grec ancien et en d'autres langues. (Société d'études linguistiques et anthropologiques de France, 15.) Pp. 269. Paris: SELAF, 1982. Paper, 96 frs. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 34 (02):338-339.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  4
    A. C. Moorhouse (1940). Greek ΓΝΗ, English ΚΙΝ. The Classical Review 54 (04):187-.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  4
    A. C. Moorhouse (1951). Latin Amata, Amita. The Classical Review 1 (01):1-3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  4
    A. C. Moorhouse (1948). The Past Optative. The Classical Review 62 (02):61-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  4
    A. L. Brown & A. C. Moorhouse (1984). The Syntax of Sophocles. Journal of Hellenic Studies 104:199.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  6
    A. C. Moorhouse & E. Laroche (1953). Histoire de la Racine Nem- En Grec Ancien. Journal of Hellenic Studies 73:167.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  5
    A. C. Moorhouse (1977). Francesco Semi: Interpretari. Introduzione al metodo linguistico e psicologico d'interpretazione dei classici con appendice sulla didattica del latino. (Nuova edizione.) Pp. viii + 235. Padua: Liviana Editrice, 1973. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (1):132.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  6
    A. C. Moorhouse (1947). The Meaning and Use of MikpoΣ and OΛiΓoΣ in the Greek Poetical Vocabulary. Classical Quarterly 41 (1-2):31-.
    Aristotle, in chapter 22 of the Poetics , has some remarks on poetic diction. He lays it down that, while poetry should be clear in meaning, it should avoid meanness of expression, σεμν δ κα ξαλλττουσα τò διωτικòν τος ξενικος κεχρημνη—it becomes dignified and elevated above the commonplace when it employs unusual words; ξενικòν δ λγω γλτταν κα μεταφορν κα πκτασιν κα πν τò παρ τò κριον—and examples of unusual words are rare words, metaphors, lengthened forms, and everything that differs (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  6
    A. C. Moorhouse (1993). The Greek Verb Yves Duhouxa: Le Verbegrec Ancien. Éléments de Morphologie Et de Syntaxe Historiques. (Bibliothèque de Cahiers de l'Institut de Linguistique de Louvain, 61.) Pp. 549. Louvain-La-Neuve: Peeters, 1992. Paper, B. Fr. 1650. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (02):316-317.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  6
    A. C. Moorhouse (1989). Haiim B. Rosén: Early Greek Grammar and Thought in Heraclitus: The Emergence of the Article. (The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities Proceedings, 7, 2.) Pp. 42. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1988. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 39 (02):404-405.
  16.  6
    A. C. Moorhouse (1972). Henri Quellet: Les dérivés latins en -or. Étude lexicographique, statistique, morphologique et sémantique. (Études et Commentaires, lxxii.) Pp. 246. Paris: Klincksieck, 1969. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 22 (01):126-127.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  6
    A. C. Moorhouse (1965). The Placing of Greek Adjectives Jean Brunel: La Construction de l'Adjectif Dans les Groupes Nominaux du Grec. (Publ. De la Fac. Des Lettres de l'Univ. De Montpellier, 20.) Pp. 132. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1964. Paper, 24 Fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 15 (01):74-75.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  5
    A. C. Moorhouse (1967). Tenses in Greek Prayer Willem Frederik Bakker: The Greek Imperative. An Investigation Into the Aspectual Differences Between the Present and Aorist Imperatives in Greek Prayer From Homer Up to the Present Day. (Utrecht Diss.) Pp. 155. Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1966. Paper, Fl. 24. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 17 (02):172-173.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  5
    A. C. Moorhouse (1992). Roger D. Woodard: On Interpreting Morphological Change: The Greek Reflexive Pronoun. Pp. Viii + 134. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben, 1990. Paper, Fl. 60. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (01):213-214.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  5
    A. C. Moorhouse (1947). Tacitus, Agricola 34. 2. The Classical Review 61 (01):12-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  13
    A. C. Moorhouse (1962). ΔΕΝ in Classical Greek. Classical Quarterly 12 (02):235-.
    occurs in two classical contexts. They are: Alc. 320 L.-P. Democr. 156 Diels Elm. Sec. Hipp. 1. 2.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  5
    A. C. Moorhouse & J. Frosen (1976). Prolegomena to a Study of the Greek Language in the First Centuries A.D.: The Problem of Koine and Atticism. Journal of Hellenic Studies 96:204.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  9
    A. C. Moorhouse (1948). The Name of the Euxine Pontus Again. Classical Quarterly 42 (1-2):59-.
    Etymology, especially that of an ancient language like Greek, is not as a rule a field in which one expects to get conclusive demonstration; and between rival explanations one is often provided with a choice which cannot be made with much confidence. But despite this I think that I should reply to the article by W. S. Allen on ‘The Name of the Black Sea in Greek’ , pp. 86–8), which has raised again the question dealt with in my article (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  2
    A. C. Moorhouse (1952). Observations on Epic ' AΛΛA. Classical Quarterly 2 (1-2):100-.
    The following notes are the result of an examination of all the early Epic passages containing λλ which I made for the purposes of the lexicon of Homer and the older Epic now under preparation by the Archiv für griechische Lexikographie at Hamburg. The texts surveyed were Homer, including the Hymns, Hesiod, and the Epic fragments. I also examined Apollonius Rhodius for the purpose of comparison.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  10
    A. C. Moorhouse (1988). M. H. B. Marshall: Verbs, Nouns, and Postpositives in Attic Prose. (Scottish Classical Studies, 3.) Pp. Vii + 178. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1987. £12.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 38 (02):430-431.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  4
    A. C. Moorhouse & G. Bjorck (1953). Das alpha impurum und die tragische Kunstsprache. Attische Wort- und Stilstudien. Journal of Hellenic Studies 73:166.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  10
    A. C. Moorhouse (1992). Albert Rijksbaron: Grammatical Observations on Euripides' Bacchae. (Amsterdam Studies in Greek Philology, 1.) Pp. X + 217. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben, 1991. Fl. 60. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (02):430-431.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  9
    A. C. Moorhouse (1981). G. P. Shipp: Modern Greek Evidence for the Ancient Greek Vocabulary. Pp. Xxvii + 655. Sydney University Press, 1979. A$25. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 31 (02):307-308.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  9
    A. C. Moorhouse (1993). The Greek Verb. The Classical Review 43 (02):316-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  7
    A. C. Moorhouse (1965). The Placing of Greek Adjectives. The Classical Review 15 (01):74-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  8
    A. C. Moorhouse (1965). André Oguse: Recherches Sur le Participe Circonstanciel En Grec Ancien. Pp. 349. Paris: Klincksieck, 1962. Paper, 40 Fr. The Classical Review 15 (03):362-363.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  8
    A. C. Moorhouse (1989). Gunnar De Boel: Goal Accusative and Object Accusative in Homer: A Contribution to the Theory of Transitivity. (Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie Voor Wetenschappen, Letteren En Schone Kunsten van België, Klasse der Letteren, Jg. 50, Nr. 125.) Pp. 196. Brussels: Paleis der Academiën, 1988. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 39 (02):403-404.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  5
    A. C. Moorhouse (1971). Greek Words for 'Nourish' Claude Moussy: Recherches sur τρω et les verbes grecs signifiant 'nourrir'. (Études et Commentaires, lxx.) Pp. 120. Paris: Klincksieck, 1969. Paper, 40fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 21 (01):90-91.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  8
    A. C. Moorhouse (1985). Greek Poetic Syntax Victor Bers: Greek Poetic Syntax in the Classical Age. Pp. Xix + 218. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1984. £18. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 35 (01):94-96.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  3
    A. C. Moorhouse (1954). ' Ek- In Colour Adjectives. Classical Quarterly 4 (1-2):96-.
    The colour adjectives and have been discussed by R. Strömberg, who has removed misconceptions about their meaning. So has been shown to mean, not ‘quite white’ , but a faded white, or one which has lost its essential whiteness: so often where the ‘natural colour has yielded to a dull dirty whitish colour’.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  3
    A. C. Moorhouse & P. Monteil (1965). La Phrase Relative En Grec Ancien. Journal of Hellenic Studies 85:187.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  7
    A. C. Moorhouse (1950). The Etymology of ΠΕΡΙΣΤΤΡΑ and Some Allied Words. Classical Quarterly 44 (1-2):73-.
    It is proposed to account here for a number of words with closely allied forms but different meanings: περιοτερα ‘pigeon’ περωτερις ‘vervain’ and ‘a woman's ornament’ ‘vervain’, ‘a woman's ornament’, and diminutive of περωτερις There are several other by-forms, as may be seen by reference to LSJ, but they add nothing to the well-established partition of meaning in this stem between the three senses ‘pigeon’, ‘vervain’, and ‘a woman's ornament’. It is my belief that we must explain the three senses (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  5
    A. C. Moorhouse (1966). F. W. Saas: Pluralia Tantum. Bijdrage tot de kennis van het gebruik van de indoeuropese numeri, in het bijzonder in het Grieks. Pp. xii+188. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1965. Paper, fl. 18.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (03):414-415.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  5
    A. C. Moorhouse (1941). IE. * Pent- and its Derivatives. Classical Quarterly 35 (1-2):90-.
    The root *pent-1 has achieved wide distribution in the IE. languages. In the course of its long history considerable modification of meaning has affected it, both as a primary verb and as it appears in derivative nouns, and here I refer particularly to Go. finpan ‘find’ and to Gk. πάτη ‘deceit’. With little ingenuity—against mere ingenuity, of course, the etymologist is bound to be on his guard—it is possible to trace the train of thought that connects the various forms. But (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  2
    A. C. Moorhouse & C. D. Buck (1957). The Greek Dialects. Grammar, Selected Inscriptions, Glossary. Journal of Hellenic Studies 77:343.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  2
    A. C. Moorhouse & O. Kujore (1975). Greek Polymorphic Presents: A Study of Their Development and Functional Tendencies. Journal of Hellenic Studies 95:225.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  4
    A. C. Moorhouse (1940). The Name of the Euxine Pontus. Classical Quarterly 34 (3-4):123-.
    It will be best to explain here, at the start, that I do not propose new etymologies for the words εὒξεινος and πόντος. I regard, then, εὒξεινος πόντος as meaning ‘the hospitable way’. My purpose is to show how such a name came to be given to the Black Sea by the Greeks. First, the word πόντος. The familiar explanation connects it with a series of words, of which I give the most important: Gk. πάτος ‘trodden path’; Skt. pάnthā ‘way’, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  1
    A. C. Moorhouse & P. Aalto (1955). Studien zur Geschichte des Infinitivs im Griechischen. Journal of Hellenic Studies 75:190.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  1
    A. C. Moorhouse (1963). The Origin and Use of O, H, TO Δeina. Classical Quarterly 13 (01):19-.
    The question of the source of the pronominal forms , and of the later fully declined forms, presents an unusual situation. It seems clear from earlier work that we should not look for the answer outside Greek, nor probably even outside colloquial Attic Greek of the fifth century. These are strong advantages, but despite them one cannot have much confidence in the solutions so far provided, and there is room for a fresh approach. In addition to this, the usage of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  1
    A. C. Moorhouse (1940). The Construction with Mh Oy. Classical Quarterly 34 (1-2):70-.
    In line 1171 of Aeschylus' Agamemnon the MSS. read μ The remainder of the sentence, after μ, is much disputed, but I am not concerned with finding the true reading of it. The whole sentence runs, in the MSS., as follows: κος δ' οδν πρκεσαντ μ πλιν μν σπερ ον χει παθεν: which appears in Thomson's Oresteia as:… πρκεσεν τ μ ok χειν πλιν μν σπερ ον χει. It is the note on this passage in Thomson to which I wish (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  1
    A. C. Moorhouse & R. H. Robins (1954). Ancient and Mediaeval Grammatical Theory in Europe, with Particular Reference to Modern Linguistic Doctrines. Journal of Hellenic Studies 74:241.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  1
    A. C. Moorhouse & W. F. Bakker (1976). Pronomen Abundans and Pronomen Coniunctum: A Contribution to the History of the Resumptive Pronoun Within the Relative Clause in Greek. Journal of Hellenic Studies 96:203.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  1
    A. C. Moorhouse & A. J. van Windekens (1954). Le Pelasgique: Essai sur une langue indo-europeenne prehellenique. Journal of Hellenic Studies 74:208.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  1
    A. C. Moorhouse (1965). A Use of OγΔEΙΣ and MΗΔEΙΣ. Classical Quarterly 15 (01):31-.
    The use of and roughly ‘to be as naught’, and of the comparable phrases employing nominally, is well known, especially in tragedy, and has been frequently commented upon. None the less I think there is still some misapprehension about the nature of the use, seen in its most acute form where and μη- occur in conjunction. We may think of Soph. Aj. 1231 on which much ink has been spilt.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. D. M. Jones & A. C. Moorhouse (1961). Studies in the Greek Negatives. Journal of Hellenic Studies 81:180.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 58