Search results for 'A. Cekanauskaite' (try it on Scholar)

  1. E. Gefenas, V. Dranseika, A. Cekanauskaite, K. Hug, S. Mezinska, E. Peicius, V. Silis, A. Soosaar & M. Strosberg (2010). Non-Equivalent Stringency of Ethical Review in the Baltic States: A Sign of a Systematic Problem in Europe? Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (7):435-439.score: 540.0
    We analyse the system of ethical review of human research in the Baltic States by introducing the principle of equivalent stringency of ethical review, that is, research projects imposing equal risks and inconveniences on research participants should be subjected to equally stringent review procedures. We examine several examples of non-equivalence or asymmetry in the system of ethical review of human research: (1) the asymmetry between rather strict regulations of clinical drug trials and relatively weaker regulations of other types of clinical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. E. Gefenas, V. Dranseika, J. Serepkaite, A. Cekanauskaite, L. Caenazzo, B. Gordijn, R. Pegoraro & E. Yuko (2012). Turning Residual Human Biological Materials Into Research Collections: Playing with Consent. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (6):351-355.score: 300.0
    This article focuses on three scenarios in which residual biological materials are turned into research collections during the procedure of procuring these materials for diagnostic, therapeutic or other non-research purposes. These three scenarios differ from each other primarily because they employ different models of consent: (a) precautionary consent, which may be secured during the collecting procedure; (b) the presumed consent model, which may be applied during the collection of materials; and (c) consent for research use of identifiable human biological materials, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Vilius Dranseika, Eugenijus Gefenas, Asta Cekanauskaite, H. U. G. Kristina, Signe Mezinska, Eimantas Peicius, Vents Silis, Andres Soosaar & Martin Strosberg (2011). Twenty Years of Human Research Ethics Committees in the Baltic States. Developing World Bioethics 11 (1):48-54.score: 120.0
    Two decades have passed since the first attempts were made to establish systematic ethical review of human research in the Baltic States. Legally and institutionally much has changed. In this paper we provide an historical and structural overview of ethical review of human research and identify some problems related to the role of ethical review in establishing quality research environment in these countries. Problems connected to (a) public availability of information, (b) management of conflicts of interest, (c) REC composition and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation