79 found
Sort by:
  1. Alan Chalmers (forthcoming). Creating a Social Space for Modern Science. Metascience:1-5.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Alan F. Chalmers (2015). Qualitative Novelty in Seventeenth-Century Science: Hydrostatics From Stevin to Pascal. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51:1-10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Alan Chalmers (2012). Guest Editorial. Foundations of Chemistry 14 (1):3-6.
    Guest editorial Content Type Journal Article Category Editorial Pages 1-4 DOI 10.1007/s10698-012-9147-z Authors Alan Chalmers, Unit for History and Philosophy of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia Journal Foundations of Chemistry Online ISSN 1572-8463 Print ISSN 1386-4238.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Alan Chalmers (2012). Intermediate Causes and Explanations: The Key to Understanding the Scientific Revolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (4):551-562.
    It is instructive to view the scientific revolution from the point of view of Robert Boyle’s distinction between intermediate and ultimate causes. From this point of view, the scientific revolution involved the identification of intermediate causes and their investigation by way of experiment as opposed to the specification of ultimate causes of the kind involved in the corpuscular matter theories of the mechanical philosophers. The merits of this point of view are explored in this paper by focussing on the hydrostatics (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Alan Chalmers (2012). Klein on the Origin of the Concept of Chemical Compound. Foundations of Chemistry 14 (1):37-53.
    Ursula Klein has argued that Geoffroy’s table of chemical affinities, published in 1718, marked the emergence of the concepts of chemical compound and chemical combination central to chemistry. In this paper her position is summarised and then modified to render it immune to criticism that has been levelled against it. The essentials of Geoffroy’s chemistry are clarified and adapted to Klein’s picture by way of a detailed comparison of it with Boyle’s corpuscular chemistry that proceeded Geoffroy’s by over half a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Susan L. Catt, John L. Anderson, Anthony J. Chalmers & Lesley J. Fallowfield (2011). A UK‐Wide Survey of Follow‐Up Practices for Patients with High‐Grade Glioma Treated with Radical Intent. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (1):1-6.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. A. Chalmers (2011). Drawing Philosophical Lessons From Perrin's Experiments on Brownian Motion: A Response to van Fraassen. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (4):711-732.
    In a recent article, van Fraassen has taken issue with the use to which Perrin’s experiments on Brownian motion have been put by philosophers, especially those defending scientific realism. He defends an alternative position by analysing the details of Perrin’s case in its historical context. In this reply, I argue that van Fraassen has not done the job well enough and I extend and in some respects attempt to correct his claims by close attention to the historical details.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Alan Chalmers (2011). Understanding Science Through its History: A Response to Newman. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):150-153.
    The paper is a response to William Newman’s rebuttal of a critique of his account of the origins of modern chemistry by Alan Chalmers. A way in which the nature of science can be illuminated by history of science is identified and an account of how this can be achieved in the context of a study of the work of Boyle defended in the face of Newman’s criticism. Texts from the writings of Boyle that are cited by Newman as posing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. A. Chalmers (2010). Review Symposium of the Scientist's Atom. Metascience 19:349-371.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Alan Chalmers (2010). Can Scientific Theories Be Warranted? In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. Cambridge University Press 58.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Alan Chalmers (2010). The Life of Theory in the New Experimentalism : Can Scientific Theories Be Warranted? In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. Cambridge University Press
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Alan F. Chalmers (2010). Boyle and the Origins of Modern Chemistry: Newman Tried in the Fire. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):1-10.
    William Newman construes the Scientific Revolution as a change in matter theory, from a hylomorphic, Aristotelian to a corpuscular, mechanical one. He sees Robert Boyle as making a major contribution to that change by way of his corpuscular chemistry. In this article it is argued that it is seriously misleading to identify what was scientific about the Scientific Revolution in terms of a change in theories of the ultimate structure of matter. Boyle showed, especially in his pneumatics, how empirically accessible, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Rom Harré, Paul Needham, Eric Scerri & Alan Chalmers (2010). A Revisionist History of Atomism. Metascience 19 (3):349-371.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Alan Chalmers, Atomism From the 17th to the 20th Century. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Alan F. Chalmers (2008). Atom and Aether in Nineteenth-Century Physical Science. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (3):157-166.
    This paper suggests that the cases made for atoms and the aether in nineteenth-century physical science were analogous, with the implication that the case for the atom was less than compelling, since there is no aether. It is argued that atoms did not play a productive role in nineteenth-century chemistry any more than the aether did in physics. Atoms and molecules did eventually find an indispensable home in chemistry but by the time that they did so they were different kinds (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Adam Chalmers (2006). Refiguring the European Union's Historical Dimension. European Journal of Political Theory 5 (4):437-454.
    The European Union requires a stronger approach to social solidarity than has been offered in existing theory. Perhaps the exigency of this claim is nowhere more evident than in the recent failed referendums in France and the Netherlands. In both cases the narrow legal-economic sense of the EU won out over what was hoped to be an emerging European public sphere, indeed a shared sense of European identity rooted in history. This article asks what type of ‘history’ this identity requires. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Alan Chalmers (2006). Atomism Before Its Time. Metascience 15 (3):515-518.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Alan Chalmers (2006). Why Alan Musgrave Should Become an Essentialist. In Colin Cheyne & John Worrall (eds.), Rationality and Reality: Conversations with Alan Musgrave. Springer 165--181.
  19. A. F. Chalmers (2004). A ciência como conhecimento derivado dos factos da experiência. Critica.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Alan Chalmers (2004). Giving `Substance' to Chemistry. Metascience 13 (1):109-111.
  21. Alan Chalmers (2004). Turning to Formulae for Solutions. Metascience 13 (1):91-94.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Alan Chalmers (2003). The Theory-Dependence of the Use of Instruments in Science. Philosophy of Science 70 (3):493-509.
    The idea that the use of instruments in science is theory‐dependent seems to threaten the extent to which the output of those instruments can act as an independent arbiter of theory. This issue is explored by studying an early use of the electron microscope to observe dislocations in crystals. It is shown that this usage did indeed involve the theory of the electron microscope but that, nevertheless, it was possible to argue strongly for the experimental results, the theory of dislocations (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. A. Chalmers (2002). Experiment Versus Mechanical Philosophy in the Work of Robert Boyle: A Reply to Anstey and Pyle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):187-193.
    We can distinguish 'mechanical' in the strict sense of the mechanical philosophers from 'mechanical' in the common sense. My claim is that Boyle's experimental science owed nothing to, and offered no support for, the mechanical philosophy in the strict sense. The attempts by my critics to undermine my case involve their interpreting 'mechanical' in something like the common sense. I certainly accept that Boyle's experimental science was productively informed by mechanical analogies, where 'mechanical' is interpreted in a common sense. But (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Ivan Dalley Crozier, Susan Hardy, David Rutledge, Niall Shanks, Ian J. Slater, Daryn Lehoux, Alan Chalmers, Shaughan Lavine, Richard McDonough, Paul Redding, Katherine Neal, David J. Stump, Nicolas Rasmussen, Fa-ti Fan, David Oldroyd, Iain Davidson, Hanne Andersen, Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis, Ivan Crozier, Anjan Chakravartty, King’S. College, John Laurent, Ian Tyrell, Susan Spath & Roy MacLeod (2001). Reviews. [REVIEW] Metascience 10 (3):412-506.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Jason Owen-Smith, John Gascoigne, Alan Chalmers, Audra J. Wolfe, Ivan Crozier, Jan Crosthwaite, Jonathan Simon, Peter Anstey, William Clower, Mark Parascandola, Robert L. Campbell, Charlotte Bigg, R. J. Hankinson, Nicolas Rasmussen, Christer Nordlund, Nessy Allen, Craig Sean McConnell, David Oldroyd, Edward Wisniewski, Jessie Saul, Stephanie H. Kenen, Ina Roy, Bradley Monton & Dianah Leigh Jackson (2001). Reviews. [REVIEW] Metascience 10 (2):232-319.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Alan Chalmers (2000). Author's Response. Metascience 9 (2):198-203.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. David Turnbull, Henry Krips, Val Dusek, Steve Fuller, Alan Sokal, Jean Bricmont, Alan Frost, Alan Chalmers, Anna Salleh, Alfred I. Tauber, Yvonne Luxford, Nicolaas Rupke, Steven French, Peter G. Brown, Hugh LaFollette, Peter Machamer, Nicolas Rasmussen, Andy J. Miller, Marya Schechtman, Ross S. West, John Forge, David Oldroyd, Nancy Demand, Darrin W. Belousek, Warren Schmaus, Sungook Hong, Rachel A. Ankeny, Peter Anstey, Jeremy Butterfield & Harshi Gunawardena (2000). Clarity, Charity and Criticism, Wit, Wisdom and Worldliness: Avoiding Intellectual Impositions. [REVIEW] Metascience 9 (3):347-498.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. A. Chalmers (1999). Steve Clarke, Metaphysics and the Disunity of Scientific Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (3):381.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. A. F. Chalmers (1999). What is This Thing Called Science? Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  30. Alan Chalmers (1999). Boyle's Analysis of Laws. In Howard Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature. Kluwer 14.
  31. Alan Chalmers (1999). Making Sense of Laws of Physics. In Howard Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature. Kluwer 3--16.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Alan Chalmers (1999). Twenty Years On: Adding the Cat's Whiskers. Science and Education 8 (4):327-338.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. David Gooding, William J. McKinney, Harry M. Marks, Jeff Hughes & Alan Chalmers (1999). What Can Particle Physicists Count On? Metascience 8 (3):356-392.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Alan Chalmers (1998). Retracing the Ancient Steps to Atomic Theory. Science and Education 7 (1):69-84.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. A. Chalmers (1997). Review. Science, Reason, and Rhetoric. Henry Krips, J E McGuire, Trevor Melia. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):444-446.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Alan Chalmers (1997). Did Democritus Ascribe Weight to Atoms? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):279 – 287.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Alan Chalmers (1997). Review. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):444-446.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Henry Krips, J. E. McGuire, Trevor Melia & Alan Chalmers (1997). Science, Reason, and Rhetoric. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):444-446.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. David Oldroyd, Phil Dowe, Adrian Mackenzie, Alison Bashford, Geoffrey C. Bowker, Alan Chalmers, I. J. Crozier, John Dargavel, Wendy Riemens & Andrew Dowling (1997). A Miller's Tale. Metascience 6 (1):105-184.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Alan Chalmers (1996). Cartwright on Fundamental Laws: A Response to Clarke. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (1):150 – 152.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Martin Rudwick, Naomi Oreskes, David Oldroyd, David Philip Miller, Alan Chalmers, John Forge, David Turnbull, Peter Slezak, David Bloor, Craig Callender, Keith Hutchison, Steven Savitt & Huw Price (1996). Review Symposia. Metascience 5 (1):7-85.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Alan Chalmers (1995). Review. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (1):444-446.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Alan Chalmers (1995). Steven Shapin: A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (1):142.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Alan Chalmers (1995). Ultimate Explanations in Science: A Historical Perspective. Cogito 9 (2):141-145.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Alan Chalmers (1994). Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century: Four Central Themes by Donald Gillies. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 85:744-744.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Alan Chalmers (1993). Galilean Relativity and Galileo's Relativity. In S. French & H. Kamminga (eds.), Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics. Kluwer 189--205.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Alan Chalmers (1993). So the Laws of Physics Needn't Lie. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):196 – 205.
  48. Alan Chalmers (1993). The Lack of Excellency of Boyle's Mechanical Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (4):541-564.
  49. Alan Chalmers (1992). Is a Law Reasonable to a Hume? Cogito 6 (3):125-129.
  50. Alan Chalmers (1990). Science and its Fabrication. Univ of Minnesota Press.
    While acknowledging its theory-ladeness, Chalmers (history and philosophy, U. of Sydney) defends the objectivity of scientific knowledge against those critics for whom such knowledge is both subjective and ideological.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 79