82 found
Order:
  1. A. F. Chalmers (1999). What is This Thing Called Science? Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  2. A. F. Chalmers (1982). What is This Thing Called Science?: An Assessment of the Nature and Status of Science and its Methods. Hackett Pub. Co..
  3.  99
    Alan Chalmers (1999). Making Sense of Laws of Physics. In Howard Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature. Kluwer 3--16.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  4.  87
    A. Chalmers (2011). Drawing Philosophical Lessons From Perrin's Experiments on Brownian Motion: A Response to van Fraassen. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (4):711-732.
    In a recent article, van Fraassen has taken issue with the use to which Perrin’s experiments on Brownian motion have been put by philosophers, especially those defending scientific realism. He defends an alternative position by analysing the details of Perrin’s case in its historical context. In this reply, I argue that van Fraassen has not done the job well enough and I extend and in some respects attempt to correct his claims by close attention to the historical details.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  5.  15
    Alan Chalmers (2012). Intermediate Causes and Explanations: The Key to Understanding the Scientific Revolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (4):551-562.
    It is instructive to view the scientific revolution from the point of view of Robert Boyle’s distinction between intermediate and ultimate causes. From this point of view, the scientific revolution involved the identification of intermediate causes and their investigation by way of experiment as opposed to the specification of ultimate causes of the kind involved in the corpuscular matter theories of the mechanical philosophers. The merits of this point of view are explored in this paper by focussing on the hydrostatics (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6.  11
    Rom Harré, Paul Needham, Eric Scerri & Alan Chalmers (2010). A Revisionist History of Atomism. Metascience 19 (3):349-371.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  7.  69
    Alan Chalmers (1993). The Lack of Excellency of Boyle's Mechanical Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (4):541-564.
  8.  9
    Alan Chalmers (1990). Science and its Fabrication. Univ of Minnesota Press.
    While acknowledging its theory-ladeness, Chalmers (history and philosophy, U. of Sydney) defends the objectivity of scientific knowledge against those critics for whom such knowledge is both subjective and ideological.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  9.  30
    Alan F. Chalmers (2010). Boyle and the Origins of Modern Chemistry: Newman Tried in the Fire. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):1-10.
    William Newman construes the Scientific Revolution as a change in matter theory, from a hylomorphic, Aristotelian to a corpuscular, mechanical one. He sees Robert Boyle as making a major contribution to that change by way of his corpuscular chemistry. In this article it is argued that it is seriously misleading to identify what was scientific about the Scientific Revolution in terms of a change in theories of the ultimate structure of matter. Boyle showed, especially in his pneumatics, how empirically accessible, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  10. Alan Chalmers (2003). The Theory-Dependence of the Use of Instruments in Science. Philosophy of Science 70 (3):493-509.
    The idea that the use of instruments in science is theory‐dependent seems to threaten the extent to which the output of those instruments can act as an independent arbiter of theory. This issue is explored by studying an early use of the electron microscope to observe dislocations in crystals. It is shown that this usage did indeed involve the theory of the electron microscope but that, nevertheless, it was possible to argue strongly for the experimental results, the theory of dislocations (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11.  84
    Alan Chalmers (1999). Boyle's Analysis of Laws. In Howard Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature. Kluwer 14.
  12.  22
    Alan Chalmers (2012). Klein on the Origin of the Concept of Chemical Compound. Foundations of Chemistry 14 (1):37-53.
    Ursula Klein has argued that Geoffroy’s table of chemical affinities, published in 1718, marked the emergence of the concepts of chemical compound and chemical combination central to chemistry. In this paper her position is summarised and then modified to render it immune to criticism that has been levelled against it. The essentials of Geoffroy’s chemistry are clarified and adapted to Klein’s picture by way of a detailed comparison of it with Boyle’s corpuscular chemistry that proceeded Geoffroy’s by over half a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13.  4
    Alan Chalmers (2010). Can Scientific Theories Be Warranted? In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. Cambridge University Press 58.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14.  25
    A. Chalmers (2002). Experiment Versus Mechanical Philosophy in the Work of Robert Boyle: A Reply to Anstey and Pyle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):187-193.
    We can distinguish 'mechanical' in the strict sense of the mechanical philosophers from 'mechanical' in the common sense. My claim is that Boyle's experimental science owed nothing to, and offered no support for, the mechanical philosophy in the strict sense. The attempts by my critics to undermine my case involve their interpreting 'mechanical' in something like the common sense. I certainly accept that Boyle's experimental science was productively informed by mechanical analogies, where 'mechanical' is interpreted in a common sense. But (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  15.  65
    Alan Chalmers (1993). So the Laws of Physics Needn't Lie. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):196 – 205.
  16.  93
    Alan Chalmers (1983). Planetary Distances and Copernican Theory: A Reply. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):372-374.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  64
    Alan F. Chalmers (2008). Atom and Aether in Nineteenth-Century Physical Science. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (3):157-166.
    This paper suggests that the cases made for atoms and the aether in nineteenth-century physical science were analogous, with the implication that the case for the atom was less than compelling, since there is no aether. It is argued that atoms did not play a productive role in nineteenth-century chemistry any more than the aether did in physics. Atoms and molecules did eventually find an indispensable home in chemistry but by the time that they did so they were different kinds (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18. Alan Chalmers (1996). Cartwright on Fundamental Laws: A Response to Clarke. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (1):150 – 152.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Alan Chalmers (1985). Galileo's Telescopic Observations of Venus and Mars. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (2):175-184.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  27
    Alan Chalmers, Atomism From the 17th to the 20th Century. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  7
    Alan Chalmers (2016). Viewing Past Science From the Point of View of Present Science, Thereby Illuminating Both: Philosophy Versus Experiment in the Work of Robert Boyle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:27-35.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  18
    Alan Chalmers (1988). The Sociology Of Knowledge And The Epistemological Status Of Science. Thesis Eleven 21 (1):82-102.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  27
    Alan Chalmers (2006). Why Alan Musgrave Should Become an Essentialist. In Colin Cheyne & John Worrall (eds.), Rationality and Reality: Conversations with Alan Musgrave. Springer 165--181.
  24.  7
    Alan Chalmers (2011). Understanding Science Through its History: A Response to Newman. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):150-153.
    The paper is a response to William Newman’s rebuttal of a critique of his account of the origins of modern chemistry by Alan Chalmers. A way in which the nature of science can be illuminated by history of science is identified and an account of how this can be achieved in the context of a study of the work of Boyle defended in the face of Newman’s criticism. Texts from the writings of Boyle that are cited by Newman as posing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  45
    A. F. Chalmers (1970). Curie's Principle. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (2):133-148.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  26.  72
    Alan Chalmers (1989). How to Defend Science Against Scepticism: A Reply to Barry Gower. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (2):249-253.
  27. A. Chalmers (2010). Review Symposium of the Scientist's Atom. Metascience 19:349-371.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  8
    A. K. Chalmers (1917). The Declining Birth-Rate: Its Causes and Effects. The Eugenics Review 8 (4):322.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  23
    Alan F. Chalmers (1986). The Heuristic Role of Maxwell's Mechanical Model of Electromagnetic Phenomena. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (4):415-427.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  30. Alan Chalmers (1988). Is Bhaskar's Realism Realistic. Radical Philosophy 49:18-23.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  31.  18
    Alan Chalmers (2014). Creating a Social Space for Modern Science. Metascience 23 (1):173-177.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  22
    Alan Chalmers (1979). Towards an Objectivist Account of Theory Change. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (3):227-233.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  33.  31
    A. F. Chalmers (1973). On Learning From Our Mistakes. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):164-173.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  5
    Alan Chalmers (1993). Galilean Relativity and Galileo's Relativity. In S. French & H. Kamminga (eds.), Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics. Kluwer 189--205.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  12
    Martin Rudwick, Naomi Oreskes, David Oldroyd, David Philip Miller, Alan Chalmers, John Forge, David Turnbull, Peter Slezak, David Bloor, Craig Callender, Keith Hutchison, Steven Savitt & Huw Price (1996). Review Symposia. Metascience 5 (1):7-85.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  9
    David Turnbull, Henry Krips, Val Dusek, Steve Fuller, Alan Sokal, Jean Bricmont, Alan Frost, Alan Chalmers, Anna Salleh, Alfred I. Tauber, Yvonne Luxford, Nicolaas Rupke, Steven French, Peter G. Brown, Hugh LaFollette, Peter Machamer, Nicolas Rasmussen, Andy J. Miller, Marya Schechtman, Ross S. West, John Forge, David Oldroyd, Nancy Demand, Darrin W. Belousek, Warren Schmaus, Sungook Hong, Rachel A. Ankeny, Peter Anstey, Jeremy Butterfield & Harshi Gunawardena (2000). Clarity, Charity and Criticism, Wit, Wisdom and Worldliness: Avoiding Intellectual Impositions. [REVIEW] Metascience 9 (3):347-498.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  11
    A. F. Chalmers (1973). Maxwell's Methodology and His. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4 (2):107-164.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  38.  8
    Alan Chalmers (2006). Atomism Before Its Time. Metascience 15 (3):515-518.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  13
    Alan Chalmers & Richard Nicholas (1983). Galileo on the Dissipative Effect of a Rotating Earth. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 14 (4):315-340.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  5
    David Gooding, William J. McKinney, Harry M. Marks, Jeff Hughes & Alan Chalmers (1999). What Can Particle Physicists Count On? Metascience 8 (3):356-392.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  16
    Alan Chalmers (2012). Guest Editorial. Foundations of Chemistry 14 (1):3-6.
    Guest editorial Content Type Journal Article Category Editorial Pages 1-4 DOI 10.1007/s10698-012-9147-z Authors Alan Chalmers, Unit for History and Philosophy of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia Journal Foundations of Chemistry Online ISSN 1572-8463 Print ISSN 1386-4238.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  7
    Alan Chalmers (1998). Retracing the Ancient Steps to Atomic Theory. Science and Education 7 (1):69-84.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. A. Chalmers (1973). The Limitations of Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 64:469-483.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  44.  6
    A. Chalmers (1997). Review. Science, Reason, and Rhetoric. Henry Krips, J E McGuire, Trevor Melia. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):444-446.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  11
    Alan Chalmers (1981). Planetary Distances in Copernican Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (4):374-375.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  20
    Alan Chalmers (1997). Did Democritus Ascribe Weight to Atoms? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):279 – 287.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  12
    Alan Chalmers (1992). Is a Law Reasonable to a Hume? Cogito 6 (3):125-129.
  48.  14
    Alan Chalmers (2004). Giving `Substance' to Chemistry. Metascience 13 (1):109-111.
  49.  5
    Alan F. Chalmers (1985). Methodological Individualism: An Incongruity in Popper's Philosophy. In Gregory Currie & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Popper and the Human Sciences. Distributors for the United States and Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers 73--87.
  50.  5
    David Oldroyd, Phil Dowe, Adrian Mackenzie, Alison Bashford, Geoffrey C. Bowker, Alan Chalmers, I. J. Crozier, John Dargavel, Wendy Riemens & Andrew Dowling (1997). A Miller's Tale. Metascience 6 (1):105-184.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 82